Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Pogach, L.
space
  arrow  Sawin, C. T.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes

right arrow Leonard Pogach, MD, and Clark T. Sawin, MD

15 May 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 10 | Pages 871-872


TO THE EDITOR:

Vijan and colleagues [1] used a Markov decision model to estimate the benefit of glycemic control with respect to the end points of blindness and end-stage renal disease in persons with type 2 diabetes without preexisting microvascular complications. They found that the benefit of glycemic control decreased with increasing age at diabetes onset.

The decrease in absolute risk resulting from decreased duration of diabetes permits risk stratification in determining a patient's target hemoglobin A1c level, an approach used to design the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Guidelines for Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Developed in collaboration with members of the Executive Committee of the National Diabetes Education Program, the VHA guidelines are available on the Internet (http://www.va.gov/health/diabetes/default.htm) and are to be used in all VHA facilities.

Participants in the guideline development concluded that a synthesis of the evidence, including key controlled trials [2], epidemiologic studies [3], and computer modeling [1, 4] supported the use of life expectancy and clinical microvascular discase as major determinants in setting a target value for glycemic control in an individual patient. Clinicians should still assess other factors, such as psychosocial issues and patient preferences, when negotiating a target with their patients.

The VHA guidelines suggest that patients who are likely to live only a few years might have a target hemoglobin A1c level of about 0.09, whereas younger patients, especially those with microvascular changes, may benefit from a target value of 0.07. Many, perhaps most, patients will have a target of about 0.08.

With risk stratification and flexible individual assessment, the VHA guidelines consider both the likelihood of an absolute reduction in microvascular outcomes and the likelihood of safely achieving a given level of glycemic control in a particular patient. We believe that this approach provides the evidence that practitioners and patients need to make informed choices and strengthens clinicians' role in caring for their patients.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System; East Orange, NJ 07019
Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Boston, MA 02130


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:788-95.

2. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 1995; 44:968-83.

3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Relation of glycemic control to diabetic microvascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124(1 Pt 2):90-6.

4. Eastman RC, Javitt JC, Herman WH, Dasbach EJ, Copley-Merriman C, Maier W, et al. Model of complications of NIDDM. II. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20:735-44.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Pogach, L.
space
  arrow  Sawin, C. T.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online