|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 January 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 1 | Pages 21-28
Background: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is one of the most common opportunistic infections in HIV-infected persons. However, most documentation of the effectiveness of antiviral therapy in reducing HSV reactivation is anecdotal.
Objective: To evaluate the quantitative effect of antiviral therapy on the frequency of HSV reactivation in HIV-infected persons.
Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.
Setting: Research clinic at a university hospital.
Patients: 48 persons (45 men and 3 women) who were HIV positive and HSV seropositive.
Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive famciclovir, 500 mg orally twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks. They then crossed over to receive the other regimen after a 1-week washout period.
Measurements: Patients obtained daily cultures of their perirectal, urethral, oral, and genital areas and kept diary records of signs and symptoms of genital and oral-labial herpes.
Results: The median CD4 cell count at study entry was 384 cells/mm3. In the intention-to-treat analysis of the first study period, HSV was isolated on 122 of 1114 (11%) placebo days compared with 9 of 1071 (1%) famciclovir days (relative risk, 0.15; P < 0.001). For patients who completed the crossover, the median difference in days with symptoms between placebo and famciclovir was 13.8% of days and the median difference in days on which HSV was isolated was 5.4% of days (P < 0.001 for both). Percentage of days with HSV-2 shedding was reduced from 9.7% to 1.3%. Breakthrough reactivations that occurred while patients were receiving famciclovir were infrequent, short, and often asymptomatic; HSV-2 isolates from these reactivations were susceptible to penciclovir in vitro.
Conclusions: Antiviral chemotherapy with famciclovir results in clinically and statistically significant reductions in the symptoms associated with HSV infection and the symptomatic and asymptomatic shedding of HSV among HIV-positive persons.
Famciclovir is a nucleoside analogue recently licensed for the treatment of herpes zoster and recurrent genital HSV infection [17]. To determine the efficacy of famciclovir for the suppression of HSV reactivation in HIV-infected persons, we did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in 48 persons with HIV infection.
Persons infected with both HIV and HSV were recruited into our study through advertisements in local newspapers and referrals from private physicians. The study was approved by the University of Washington institutional review board. We screened 123 persons and enrolled 48. Reasons for exclusion were lack of HSV antibodies (14%), inability to complete or lack of interest in completing 4 consecutive months of daily home culture (80%), and unwillingness to go without therapy during a recurrence of HSV (6%). At enrollment, each participant completed a standardized interview designed to record history of previous HSV reactivation, frequency of previous antiherpesvirus therapy, and extent of HIV disease. We excluded persons if they were younger than 18 years of age, were currently infected or had previously been infected with acyclovir-resistant HSV, had known gastrointestinal disorders affecting absorption, or had received suppressive antiviral therapy with acyclovir in the 6 months before enrollment. Patients were paid $300 for completion of the protocol; those who completed only the first arm of the protocol were paid $150.
At study entry, each participant was randomly assigned to receive either famciclovir tablets, 500 mg twice daily, or placebo tablets (identical in appearance to the famciclovir tablets) twice daily, for 8 weeks. This 8-week period was followed by a 7-day washout period, during which no pills were taken, and then by a second 8-week period during which participants received whichever regimen they had not received during the first phase of the trial. We chose this study design because it controlled for the variability between individual persons in CD4 cell count (which can affect the frequency of HSV reactivation [13]) and because a 7-day washout period had been shown not to influence subsequent HSV reactivation [18].
Famciclovir and placebo were dispensed in 28-day supplies (56 pills). During the entire 119-day study period, patients obtained once-daily cultures of the oropharynx, genitals (urethra and penile shaft in men; cervicovaginal area and labia in women), and rectum. Participants returned to the clinic at 28-day intervals so that we could review their daily symptom diaries, monitor compliance, distribute more study medication and culture supplies, and assess safety. All participants were also asked to return to the clinic during episodes of genital herpes. At these visits, we performed genital examinations to confirm the presence of lesions and obtained additional cultures of the lesions. Both participants and investigators were blinded to culture results until the conclusion of the study. Neither open-label oral acyclovir nor topical anti-HSV products for treatment of an HSV recurrence were allowed.
Collection of Daily Cultures
The methods used to collect swabs for HSV isolation have been described elsewhere [16, 18]. Each participant collected one specimen daily from each of four anatomic sites, using a separate Dacron swab for each culture. Oral-pharyngeal cultures were obtained by inserting a swab into the mouth and vigorously rubbing it along the gum line and over the palate. Men obtained urethral cultures by rubbing a swab over the urethral opening and obtained penile cultures by rubbing a separate swab along the entire ventral and dorsal shaft of the penis. Women obtained labial cultures by rubbing a swab over the entire labia majora and minora. Cervicovaginal cultures were obtained by rubbing a swab over the exocervix and posterior vaginal fornix. Rectal cultures were obtained by inserting the swab approximately 2 to 4 cm into the anus and gently rotating it. Each swab was placed in a separate vial that contained viral transport media, was labeled with site and date, and was stored in the refrigerator. Participants were instructed to obtain the cultures at the same time each day, preferably upon awakening. Cultures were picked up by a courier within 36 hours of collection and were transported to the virology laboratory of the University of Washington, where they were immediately inoculated into tissue culture. Participants also filled out daily diary cards that recorded the site-specific presence or absence of symptoms (pain, tingling, numbness or itching, presence of lesions) and the number of pills taken each day. The cards were collected monthly and reviewed by the study clinician. Unused cards of medication were collected, and pill counts were done to confirm compliance records.
Laboratory Studies
Serologic and T-Cell Analysis
Seropositivity for HIV was confirmed by using standard enzyme-linked immunoassays and Western blot assays. CD4 cell subset analysis was done by using flow cytometry. Tests for antibodies to HSV were performed with Western blot analysis on serum specimens obtained at study entry [11, 19]. Patients were classified into three groups: those who were seropositive for HSV-1 only, those who were seropositive for HSV-2 only, and those who were seropositive for both HSV-1 and HSV-2.
Herpes Simplex Virus Culture and Sensitivity Testing
For isolation of HSV, each sample was inoculated in triplicate into 48-well microtiter plates that contained human diploid fibroblasts [20]. Each well was examined three times weekly for evidence of cytopathic changes of HSV infection. Cultures that showed cytopathic effects were confirmed and typed by using HSV-specific monoclonal antibodies.
The initial culture supernatant from each clinical isolate that was obtained while patients were receiving famciclovir was inoculated into human diploid fibroblast cells [21]. Cell-associated virus (1:200 dilution in MEM [minimal essential media]-10% fetal calf serum) was inoculated in duplicate onto freshly confluent diploid fibroblast cells in 24-well plates. Plates were rocked at 30 tilts per minute for 60 minutes; penciclovir (Smith-Kline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) containing medium was then added at 11 serial log2 dilutions from 40.96 to 0.04 µg/mL. Control wells with no penciclovir were also established. When controls without penciclovir demonstrated 4+ cytopathic effect, the Hybriwick kit (Diagnostic Hybrids, Athens, Ohio) was used to measure HSV DNA [22] according to the manufacturer's directions. The IC50 value was estimated as the lowest concentration of drug that caused a 50% or greater reduction of mean cycles per minute hybridization of HSV-specific DNA probe to cell lysates. Values for IC50 were calculated with a computer algorithm that used a Michaelis-Menten model and nonlinear least-squares curve fitting.
Definition of Terms
Total HSV shedding was defined as the total number of days on which HSV was isolated by culture (regardless of anatomic site) divided by the total number of days on which cultures were obtained. Asymptomatic HSV shedding was defined as the total number of days on which a participant reported no symptoms or lesions at an anatomic site from which HSV was isolated divided by the total number of days on which cultures were obtained. Symptomatic HSV shedding was defined as the total number of days on which a lesion or symptom was reported by the participant in the symptom diary at an anatomic site from which HSV was isolated divided by the total number of culture days. A recurrence of genital herpes was defined as lasting from the onset of lesions to the complete healing of lesions.
Statistical Analysis
Treatment effect was initially evaluated with intention-to-treat analyses that included all randomly assigned participants before crossover. Survival analysis was used to handle data censoring caused by early withdrawals. Time to first isolation of HSV (either HSV-1 or HSV-2) by culture, time to HSV-1 isolation, and time to HSV-2 isolation were examined. Differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between the famciclovir and placebo groups in the first treatment period were assessed by using the log-rank test. The relative risk for shedding was estimated by using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model with first-period treatment as the only predictor variable.
To determine the effect of famciclovir on reduction of HSV-1 and HSV-2 shedding rates and days with symptoms, we used crossover analysis methods to further analyze participants who successfully completed both arms of the study. Successful completion was defined as more than 28 days with cultures in each treatment arm. Because HSV shedding and symptom rates were not normally distributed, nonparametric tests were used. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for carryover (residual) and period effects compared the sums and differences, respectively, of rates during placebo and famciclovir administration in participants who received famciclovir first compared with those who received placebo first [23]. In the absence of carryover and period effects, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the difference between placebo and famciclovir for each patient was used to examine treatment effect. This test is sensitive to a nonzero median difference or asymmetry between positive and negative differences.
Management of Protocol
After screening for eligibility, we assigned each patient to a treatment sequence (famciclovir followed by placebo or placebo followed by famciclovir) according to a computer-generated randomization code provided by the sponsor in blocks of four. Famciclovir and placebo tablets were identical in appearance and were presented to patients as four identical treatment packs containing weekly blister cards. The information on treatment assignments was held by the study sponsor and was not broken for any patient during the study. Neither the patients nor any personnel directly involved in conducting the study, monitoring the study, or reviewing the data knew the treatment assignments until the code was broken and the data were analyzed at the conclusion of the study.
Role of Study Sponsor
All data collection, analysis, and interpretation were done at the University of Washington independently of the study sponsor. In addition, preparation of the manuscript, decisions about what to include in the manuscript, and decisions about where to submit the manuscript for publication were all done independently of the industry sponsor. The final manuscript was submitted to the industry sponsor for internal review before submission; however, the authors were not obligated to use any suggested comments, revisions, or suggestions.
We enrolled 48 participants (45 men and 3 women) who were seropositive for both HSV and HIV (Table 1). The median age at study entry was 34 years (range, 22 to 65 years). Eighteen of 48 patients (37%) had asymptomatic HIV infection at study entry, and the rest had AIDS. The median CD4 cell count at study entry was 384 cells/mm3. Sixteen participants were receiving antiretroviral therapy; half of the 16 were initially assigned to receive famciclovir and half were initially assigned to receive placebo. Three participants (6%) had antibodies to HSV-1 only, 18 (38%) had antibodies to HSV-2 only, and 27 (56%) had antibodies to both HSV-1 and HSV-2. No notable differences were seen in HIV status, CD4 cell counts at study entry, demographic variables, HSV serologic profiles, or history of HSV recurrences for those initially assigned to receive placebo and those initially assigned to receive famciclovir. Half of the participants were initially assigned to receive placebo, and half were initially assigned to receive famciclovir; 37 of 48 participants (77%) completed the first arm of the study. The other 11 participants (6 receiving famciclovir and 5 receiving placebo) withdrew from the study within 28 days of enrollment. The incidence of adverse events was similar with famciclovir and placebo. ARTICLE
Famciclovir for the Suppression of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Herpes Simplex Virus Reactivation in HIV-Infected Persons: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Persistent genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection was one of the first opportunistic infections described in persons with AIDS [1]. Although 60% to 80% of the general population has serum antibodies to HSV-1, HSV-2, or both [2-4], up to 95% of HIV-positive persons are seropositive for either HSV-1, HSV-2, or both [5-11]. This makes HSV one of the most common viral infections complicating HIV infection. Anecdotal reports indicate that clinical reactivations usually persist for an extended period, may involve many cutaneous and mucosal sites, and seem to increase with progression of HIV disease [12, 13]. In addition, long-term antiviral therapy is commonly used to suppress frequent HSV reactivations. Although the efficacy of such therapy is well established in immunocompetent persons [14-16], no published trials have quantitated the efficacy of suppressive antiviral therapy on HSV-1 or HSV-2 reactivation in HIV-infected persons.
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Study Participants and Design
Results
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Study Group and Compliance
|
Intention-to-Treat Analysis of the First Treatment Period
All 48 enrolled participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, which considered all data collected up to the time of crossover (Table 2). The median number of days on which cultures were obtained before crossover was 55 for patients initially assigned to receive placebo and 54 for patients initially assigned to receive famciclovir. Participants took 98% of prescribed pills during this period, and symptom diaries were kept for a median of 56 days in both groups. Overall, 5 of 24 participants (21%) assigned to famciclovir and 17 of 24 (71%) assigned to placebo shed HSV at least once during the initial treatment phase. Famciclovir therapy delayed the time to detection of HSV-1 and HSV-2 (Figure 1). We isolated HSV on 122 of 1114 days (11%) for the placebo group and 9 of 1071 days (1%) for the famciclovir group. Among the 30 persons who were seropositive for HSV-1, 1 of 14 receiving famciclovir (7%) and 6 of 16 receiving placebo (38%) shed HSV-1. Among the 45 persons who were seropositive for HSV-2, 4 of 23 (17%) receiving famciclovir and 14 of 22 (64%) receiving placebo shed HSV-2. By using the Cox model, we estimated that the relative risks for any HSV shedding, HSV-1 shedding, and HSV-2 shedding for famciclovir recipients compared with placebo recipients were 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.42; P < 0.001), 0.18 (CI, 0.02 to 1.45; P = 0.066), and 0.15 (CI, 0.05 to 0.45; P < 0.001), respectively. In other words, total HSV shedding and HSV-2 shedding were significantly lower while patients were receiving famciclovir. Famciclovir therapy also substantially reduced the total number of days with lesions (from 11% to 4%) and the total number of days with symptoms (from 18% to 5%).
|
|
Crossover Analysis
Participants Who Completed Both Arms of the Study
Of 37 participants who completed the initial phase of the trial, 33 crossed over to receive the alternate study regimen and 29 completed both regimens. Three of four late withdrawals were due to the time requirements of the study, and the fourth occurred because the participant moved from the area. For the 29 participants who completed both study periods, the median number of days on which cultures were obtained was 54 while patients were receiving famciclovir, 55 while patients were receiving placebo, and 7 during the washout period. Participants took 98% of the prescribed doses.
Only 2 (7%) of the 29 participants who completed both arms of the study had neither symptoms nor viral shedding at any time during the study. Days with symptoms and days with shedding were both reduced by famciclovir therapy. Of the 29 participants, 18 (62%) had fewer days with symptoms and 20 (69%) had less HSV shedding while receiving famciclovir. The median difference in days with symptoms was 13.8% of days, and the median difference in days with total HSV shedding was 5.4% of days (P < 0.001 for both). Neither carryover effects nor period effects were statistically significant (P > 0.2 for all), indicating that the observed differences were related solely to therapy.
Participants with Antibodies to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 at Baseline Who Completed Both Arms of the Study
Of the 26 participants with HSV-2 who completed both arms of the study, 13 were initially assigned to receive placebo and 13 were initially assigned to receive famciclovir. Fifteen (58%) shed HSV-2 only while receiving placebo, 2 (8%) shed HSV-2 only while receiving famciclovir, and 4 (15%) shed HSV-2 during both arms of the study. All HSV-2 reactivations were anogenital. Five (19%) of 26 participants never had HSV-2 isolated from any anatomic site during the 17-week study period; 2 of the 5, however, had HSV-1 isolated from the oropharynx. The median rate of HSV-2 isolation was 5.6% of days (range, 0% to 50% of days) while participants were receiving placebo and 0% of days (range, 0% to 18% of days) while participants were receiving famciclovir (P = 0.001) (Table 3). Isolation of HSV-2 occurred on 9.7% of placebo days and 1.3% of famciclovir days, for an 87% reduction in viral shedding with famciclovir. Famciclovir reduced the frequency of total, symptomatic, and asymptomatic HSV-2 shedding. The effectiveness of famciclovir was similar in all of these analyses, for an 87% reduction in total shedding, a 76% reduction in asymptomatic shedding, and a 97% reduction in symptomatic shedding.
|
Twenty-five recurrences of genital herpes occurred among the 26 participants who were seropositive for HSV-2. Seven recurrences began while participants were receiving famciclovir, 16 began while participants were receiving placebo, and 2 began during the washout period. The median duration was 5 days for anogenital recurrences that began while participants were receiving famciclovir and 11 days for those that began while patients were receiving placebo. There were 85 days with anogenital symptoms during famciclovir therapy (5.8% of days during therapy) and 243 days with anogenital symptoms during placebo administration (16.5% of days during administration), for a 65% reduction in days with anogenital symptoms (P = 0.007). The percentages of days with herpetic lesions (4.9% compared with 13.8%) and of days with symptoms but no lesions (0.9% compared with 2.7%) were lower during famciclovir therapy than during placebo administration. For symptoms as well as shedding, no significant carryover or period effects were seen (P > 0.2 for both). In other words, findings were similar in participants who received famciclovir first and participants who received placebo first.
Participants with Antibodies to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Who Completed Both Arms of the Study
Famciclovir also reduced HSV-1 reactivation. Among the 20 participants with antibodies to HSV-1, 7 (35%) shed HSV-1 only while receiving placebo, 1 (5%) shed HSV-1 only while receiving famciclovir, and 2 (10%) shed HSV-1 during both arms of the study. The remaining half of these participants never shed HSV-1. Shedding of HSV-1 occurred on 26 of 1084 placebo days (2.4%) and 6 of 1053 famciclovir days (0.6%) and was always oral-labial. All famciclovir days and 77% of placebo days with HSV-1 shedding were asymptomatic. Famciclovir reduced the percentage of days with oral symptoms from 7.3% with placebo to 1.3% with famciclovir. The reductions in shedding and symptoms were statistically significant (P = 0.02 for both), and no carryover or period effects were found (data not shown).
Shedding of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 during Famciclovir Therapy
Six participants shed HSV-2 while receiving famciclovir (Table 4). In two participants, isolated days of shedding were seen on days 22 and 46 of famciclovir therapy. A third participant shed HSV-2 on days 35 and 36 of therapy. Four days of shedding in two other patients began on days 1 and 2 of famciclovir therapy. Half of the episodes of breakthrough HSV-2 shedding were associated with missed or inadequate famciclovir doses. All HSV-2 isolates obtained during famciclovir treatment were susceptible to famciclovir in vitro (IC50
2.9 µg/mL).
|
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used a crossover trial design to allow measurement of the reduction of HSV reactivation by paired analysis as well as by the more standard intention-to-treat analysis. This design allowed us to evaluate patterns more accurately over time and independently of differences related to progression of HIV disease [13]. Both analytic methods revealed a treatment effect of famciclovir on HSV reactivation. In the intention-to-treat analysis of the first treatment period, the time to the first HSV reactivation was delayed in the famciclovir group. In the paired analysis, famciclovir resulted in a marked reduction in total, symptomatic, and asymptomatic HSV shedding. Daily famciclovir therapy reduced total HSV-2 shedding by 87%. In addition to the significant virologic benefit of therapy, the frequency of genital signs and symptoms was reduced by 65%. The percentage of days with genital lesions was reduced from 13.8% to 4.9%. Recurrences of genital herpes that began while participants were receiving placebo lasted a median of 11 days; recurrences that began while participants were receiving famciclovir lasted a median of 5 days. Thus, even if breakthroughs occurred, famciclovir shortened the course of the recurrences.
Famciclovir is the oral formulation of penciclovir and is 77% bioavailable [25]. Penciclovir is a selective substrate for the HSV-1, HSV-2, and varicella-zoster virus thymidine kinase. Viral thymidine kinase phosphorylates penciclovir to penciclovir monophosphate; this allows cellular enzymes to produce penciclovir triphosphate, which selectively inhibits the viral DNA polymerase [26]. Penciclovir triphosphate has an intracellular half life of 10 to 20 hours in HSV-infected cells [26]. The in vitro IC50 of penciclovir for HSV-1 and HSV-2 is 0.4 to 0.6 µg/mL and 1.5 to 2.4 µg/mL, respectively. A single oral 500-mg dose of famciclovir resulted in maximum plasma concentrations of penciclovir ranging from 2.73 to 3.97 µg/mL [27].
Although famciclovir therapy was very effective, HSV-2 shedding still occurred during this therapy in 6 (23%) of 26 persons who were seropositive for HSV-2. Most of these episodes were single days of asymptomatic shedding. Of the five episodes of multiple days of shedding during famciclovir therapy, two occurred within the first 48 hours of therapy and one was associated with noncompliance. Isolates from these reactivations were sensitive to penciclovir in vitro [28]. Thus, breakthroughs during famciclovir therapy were due to shedding before the onset of the antiviral effects of the drug, noncompliance, or unknown causes. These findings are similar to those in previous studies of oral acyclovir in immunocompetent patients [16].
Famciclovir was well tolerated in our study. No patient discontinued therapy because of toxicity or side effects related to medication over 8 weeks of follow-up. Our dropout rate (40%) was greater than the 24% rate in our earlier study of similar design in HIV-seronegative women [16]. Participants who withdrew from the study reported complications of HIV as the main reason for dropping out.
Two (7%) of the 29 participants in the crossover analysis had no symptoms or shedding during the 17-week study period; this indicates that in a clinical setting, some patients may not benefit from daily suppressive antiviral chemotherapy. Their CD4 cell counts were 440 and 688 cells/mm3, respectively. On the other hand, half of the participants with HSV-2 who completed the crossover study had reductions in both anogenital symptoms and HSV-2 shedding while receiving daily famciclovir therapy. In these 13 participants, the median percentage of days with anogenital symptoms during placebo administration was 30% and the percentage of days with HSV-2 shedding was 13%; both of these measures were reduced to a median of 0 during famciclovir therapy. Reactivation of HSV itself in some persons has been associated with increased levels of HIV-1 RNA in plasma [29]. Thus, suppression of reactivation may also offer potential benefit in reducing chronic T-cell activation [30]. In summary, our data indicate that suppressive antiviral chemotherapy offers clinical benefit to HIV-infected persons with frequently recurring HSV. The costbenefit ratios for intermittent and daily therapy have not been compared. Despite these positive findings and the widespread use of antiviral chemotherapy for HSV in HIV-infected persons, many questions still need to be answered before guidelines for the optimal management of HSV infection can be developed.
Presented in part at the Third Antiviral Conference on Human Retrovirus, January 1996, Washington, D.C.
Drs. Hu and Zeh: University of Washington, Department of Statistics, Box 354322, Seattle, WA 98195-4322.
Drs. Koelle and Corey: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia Street, M115, Seattle, WA 98104.
Dr. Saltzman and Mr. Boon: SmithKline Beecham, 1250 South Collegeville Road, PO Box 2089, Collegeville, PA 19426-0989.
Ms. Shaughnessy and Ms. Barnum: Virology Research Clinic, 1001 Broadway, Suite 320, Seattle, WA 98122.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Siegal FP, Lopez C, Hammer GS, Brown AE, Kornfeld SJ, Gold J, et al. Severe acquired immunodeficiency in male homosexuals, manifested by chronic perianal ulcerative herpes simplex lesions. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305:1439-44.
2. Wentworth BB, Alexander ER. Seroepidemiology of infections due to members of the herpesvirus group. Am J Epidemiol. 1971; 94:496-507.
3. Gibson JJ, Hornung CA, Alexander GR, Lee FK, Potts WA, Nahmias AJ. A cross-sectional study of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in college students: occurrence and determinants of infection. J Infect Dis. 1990; 162:306-12.
4. Johnson RE, Nahmias AJ, Magder LS, Lee FK, Brooks CA, Snowden CB. A seroepidemiologic survey of the prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321:7-12.
5. Enzensberger R, Braun W, July C, Helm EB, Doerr HW. Prevalence of antibodies to human herpesviruses and hepatitis B virus in patients at different stages of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Infection. 1991; 3:140-5.
6. Mann SL, Meyers JD, Holmes KL, Corey L. Prevalence and incidence of herpesvirus infections among homosexually active men. J Infect Dis. 1984; 149:1026-7.
7. Siegel D, Golden E, Washington AE, Morse SA, Fullilove MT, Catania JA, et al. Prevalence and correlates of herpes simplex infections. The population-based AIDS in Multiethnic Neighborhoods Study. JAMA. 1992; 268:1702-8.
8. Quinn TC, Piot P, McCormick JB, Feinsod FM, Taelman H, Kapita B, et al. Serologic and immunologic studies in patients with AIDS in North America and Africa. The potential role of infectious agents as cofactors in human immunodeficiency virus infection. JAMA. 1987; 257:2617-21.
9. Mertz GJ. Genital herpes simplex virus infections. Med Clin North Am. 1990; 74:1433-54.
10. Nahmlas A, Lee F, Beckman-Nahmias S. Sero-epidemiological and sociological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990; 69:19-36.
11. Safrin S, Arvin A, Mills J, Ashley R. Comparison of the Western immunoblot assay and a glycoprotein G enzyme immunoassay for detection of serum antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 patients with AIDS. J Clin Microbiol. 1992; 30:1312-4.
12. Augenbraun M, Feldman J, Chirgwin K, Zenilman J, Clarke L, DeHovitz J, et al. Increased genital shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2 in HIV-seropositive women. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:845-7.
13. Bagdades EK, Pillay D, Squlre SB, O'Neil C, Johnson MA, Griffiths PD. Relationship between herpes simplex virus ulceration and CD4+ cell counts in patients with HIV infection. AIDS. 1992; 6:1317-20.
14. Straus SE, Taklff HE, Seidlin M, Bachrach S, Lininger L, DiGiovanna JJ, et al. Suppression of frequently recurring genital herpes. A placebo-controlled double-blind trial of oral acyclovir. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310:1545-50.
15. Douglas JM, Critchlow C, Benedetti J, Mertz GJ, Connor JD, Hintz MA, et al. A double-blind study of oral acyclovir for suppression of recurrences of genital herpes simplex virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310:1551-6.
16. Wald A, Zeh J, Barnum G, Davis LG, Corey L. Suppression of subclinical shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2 with acyclovir. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124:8-15.
17. Boyd M, Safrin S, Kern E. Penciclovir: a review of its spectrum of activity, sensitivity, and cross-resistance pattern. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy. 1993; 4(Suppl 1):3-11.
18. Wald A, Corey L, Cone R, Hobson A, Davais G, Zeh J. Frequent genital herpes simplex virus 2 shedding in immunocompetent women. Effect of acyclovir treatment. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:1092-7.
19. Ashley RL, Militoni J, Lee F, Nahmias A, Corey L. Comparison of Western blot (immunoblot) and glycoprotein G-specific immunodot enzyme assay for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human sera. J Clin Microbiol. 1988; 26:662-7.
20. Langenberg A, Zbanyszek R, Dragavon J, Ashley R, Corey L. Comparison of diploid fibroblast and rabbit kidney tissue cultures and a diploid fibroblast microtiter plate system for the isolation of herpes simplex virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1988; 26:1772-4.
21. Schmidt NJ, Emmons RW, eds. Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections. Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc; 1989.
22. Swierkosz EM, Scholl DR, Brown JL, Jollick JD, Gleaves CA. Improved DNA hybridization method for detection of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31:1465-9.
23. Koch GG. The use of non-parametric methods in the statistical analysis of the two-period change-over design. Biometrics. 1972; 28:577-84.
24. Safrin S, Ashley R, Houlihan C, Cusick PS, Mills J. Clinical and serologic features of herpes simplex virus infection in patients with AIDS. AIDS. 1991; 5:1107-10.[Medline]
25. Vere Hodge RA. Famciclovir and penciclovir. The mode of action of famciclovir including its conversion to penciclovir. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy. 1993; 4:67-84.
26. Hodge RA, Perkins RM. Mode of action of 9-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl-but-1-yl) guanine (BRL 39123) against herpes simplex virus in MRC-5 cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989; 33:223-9.
27. Perry CM, Wagstaff AJ. Famciclovir. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in herpesvirus infections. Drugs. 1995; 50:396-415.
28. Safrin S, Phan L. In vitro activity of penciclovir against clinical isolates of acyclovir-resistant and foscarnet-resistant herpes simplex virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993; 37:2241-3.
29. Mole L, Ripich S, Margolis D, Holodnly M. The impact of active herpes simplex virus infection on human immunodeficiency virus load. J Infect Dis. [In press.].
30. Stanley SK, Ostrowski MA, Justement JS, Gantt K, Hedayati S, Mannix M, et al. Effect of immunization with a common recall antigen on viral expression in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1222-30.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. McMahon, J. D. Siliciano, J. Lai, J. O. Liu, J. T. Stivers, R. F. Siliciano, and R. M. Kohli The Antiherpetic Drug Acyclovir Inhibits HIV Replication and Selects the V75I Reverse Transcriptase Multidrug Resistance Mutation J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2008; 283(46): 31289 - 31293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Mayaud, N Nagot, I Konate, A Ouedraogo, H A Weiss, V Foulongne, M-C Defer, A Sawadogo, M Segondy, P Van de Perre, et al. Effect of HIV-1 and antiretroviral therapy on herpes simplex virus type 2: a prospective study in African women Sex Transm Inf, October 1, 2008; 84(5): 332 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cernik, K. Gallina, and R. T. Brodell The Treatment of Herpes Simplex Infections: An Evidence-Based Review Arch Intern Med, June 9, 2008; 168(11): 1137 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagot, A. Ouedraogo, V. Foulongne, I. Konate, H. A. Weiss, L. Vergne, M.-C. Defer, D. Djagbare, A. Sanon, J.-B. Andonaba, et al. Reduction of HIV-1 RNA Levels with Therapy to Suppress Herpes Simplex Virus N. Engl. J. Med., February 22, 2007; 356(8): 790 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D N Fisman, E W Hook III, and S J Goldie Estimating the costs and benefits of screening monogamous, heterosexual couples for unrecognised infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 Sex Transm Inf, February 1, 2003; 79(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. b. H. Masur, J. E. Kaplan, and K. K. Holmes Guidelines for Preventing Opportunistic Infections among HIV-Infected Persons--2002: Recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Ann Intern Med, September 3, 2002; 137(5_Part_2): 435 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Loutsch, B. Sainz Jr., M. E. Marquart, X. Zheng, P. Kesavan, S. Higaki, J. M. Hill, and R. Tal-Singer Effect of Famciclovir on Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Corneal Disease and Establishment of Latency in Rabbits Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2001; 45(7): 2044 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pauk, M.-L. Huang, S. J. Brodie, A. Wald, D. M. Koelle, T. Schacker, C. Celum, S. Selke, and L. Corey Mucosal Shedding of Human Herpesvirus 8 in Men N. Engl. J. Med., November 9, 2000; 343(19): 1369 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wald, J. Zeh, S. Selke, T. Warren, A. J. Ryncarz, R. Ashley, J. N. Krieger, and L. Corey Reactivation of Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Asymptomatic Seropositive Persons N. Engl. J. Med., March 23, 2000; 342(12): 844 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Corey and H. H. Handsfield Genital Herpes and Public Health: Addressing a Global Problem JAMA, February 9, 2000; 283(6): 791 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
USPHS/IDSA Prevention of Opportunistic Infections 1999 USPHS/IDSA Guidelines for the Prevention of Opportunistic Infections in Persons Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Ann Intern Med, December 7, 1999; 131(11): 873 - 908. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Severson and S. K. Tyring Relation Between Herpes Simplex Viruses and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections Arch Dermatol, November 1, 1999; 135(11): 1393 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Update on drugs for herpes zoster and genital herpes DTB, October 1, 1998; 36(10): 77 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schacker, A. J. Ryncarz, J. Goddard, K. Diem, M. Shaughnessy, and L. Corey Frequent Recovery of HIV-1 From Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Lesions in HIV-1-Infected Men JAMA, July 1, 1998; 280(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Famciclovir Suppresses Herpesvirus Reactivation in HIV-Positive Patients Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, March 1, 1998; 1998(301): 15 - 15. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Suppression of HSV with Famciclovir AIDS Clinical Care, February 1, 1998; 1998(201): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Suppressing HSV Reactivation in Patients with HIV Disease Journal Watch Dermatology, February 1, 1998; 1998(201): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
ANTIVIRALS FOR RECURRENT HERPES IN PERSONS WITH HIV Journal Watch (General), January 20, 1998; 1998(120): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||