Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Prystowsky, E. N.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Cardioversion: Going for Broke?

right arrow Eric N. Prystowsky, MD

15 October 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 8 (Part 1) | Pages 652-653


IN RESPONSE:

The TEE-guided approach to cardioversion used by experts is safe, as shown by Manning and colleagues [1]. The ACUTE Pilot Study [2] compared the TEE-guided approach with the conventional approach to cardioversion. In my editorial, I suggested that a larger-scale clinical trial should provide valuable data about the risk for thromboembolism. However, I also questioned the "supposed" major limitations of the conventional approach, as outlined by Klein and coworkers [2]. The use of anticoagulation before cardioversion carries a risk for embolism of 1% or less. Thus, the data to date do not suggest a major risk for emboli with the conventional approach. Furthermore, the ACUTE Pilot Study showed no difference between approaches in the rate of successful cardioversion or the presence of sinus rhythm at follow-up [2]. Of note, most patients with atrial fibrillation have an indication for long-term anticoagulation [3]. In this setting, loss of a few weeks of anticoagulation before cardioversion seems meaningless.

In the hospitalized patient, the potential benefits of the TEE-guided approach are much more realistic. One can perform cardioversion quickly and initiate antiarrhythmic drug therapy while patients are still in the hospital, which will maximize safety with regard to potential proarrhythmic effects. This may preclude the need for rehospitalization.

Klein and coworkers paraphrase my initial query, "If it ain't broke, why fix it?" They suggest that we need to "go for broke." Indeed, this is exactly what we should avoid. In my opinion, the expense of using TEE as a routine procedure for all or most outpatient elective cardioversions for atrial fibrillation could add a major and possibly unnecessary financial burden to the health care system. Thus, I still favor judicious and individualized use of the TEE-guided approach for outpatient cardioversion until the final results of a large-scale prospective study suggest otherwise.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Northside Cardiology, P.C.; Indianapolis, IN 46260


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Manning WJ, Silverman DI, Keighley CS, Oettgen P, Douglas PS. Transesophageal echocardiography facilitated early cardioversion from atrial fibrillation using short-term anticoagulation: final results of a prospective 4.5-year study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:1354-61.

2. Klein AL, Grimm RA, Black IW, Leung DY, Chung MK, Vaughn SE, et al. Cardioversion guided by transesophageal echocardiography: the ACUTE Pilot Study. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:200-9.

3. Prystowsky EN, Benson DW Jr, Fuster V, Hart RG, Kay GN, Myerburg RJ, et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A statement for healthcare professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996; 93:1262-77.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Prystowsky, E. N.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online