Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Barry, M. J.
space
  arrow  Coley, C. M.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

REPLY

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

right arrow Michael J. Barry, MD, and Christopher M. Coley, MD

15 October 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 5 Part 1 | Page 657


IN RESPONSE:

The two preceding letters reflect the controversy over how aggressive clinicians should be in recommending for or against early detection efforts for prostate cancer, particularly with PSA determinations.

Dr. Ashley and Mr. Knuth argue that the predicted benefits of early detection of prostate cancer would be greater at any given age if healthier men with longer life expectancies were selected for screening. We agree. However, we do not agree that clinicians screen only healthy men for prostate cancer (particularly when "healthy" is defined as having no significant illnesses, normal results on basic laboratory tests, and not smoking), and no evidence is cited to support this assertion. In a 1995 nationwide survey of primary care physicians, for example, we found that 55%, 66%, 65%, and 58% of physicians, "almost always" perform routine PSA tests on men in their 50s, 60s, early 70s, and late 70s, respectively, despite the obvious fact that many of these men are being seen for medical problems [1]. Therefore, we believe that the life expectancies we used in our model, which represent an "average" burden of comorbidity, are appropriate for making policy decisions about screening. We agree, however, that clinicians should consider each man's age and health status when advising them individually about screening.

Dr. Winters would prefer an even stronger injunction against PSA testing for men in their 70s, citing the "slippery slope" toward aggressive intervention that may await men who are found to have prostate cancer at screening. Although we generally agree that our estimates of risks and benefits would favor a nonscreening decision for most men in their 70s, we cannot be sure that a healthy man in his early 70s who decides to accept the risks of screening and is fully cognizant of this slippery slope is being unreasonable in doing so. Only time, and the results of clinical trials, will tell. We do agree that a discussion of the downstream consequences of PSA testing, the known risks, and the uncertain benefits of aggressive treatment should be conducted with men in this age group before a test is ordered.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston, MA 02114
Harvard University Health Services; Boston, MA 02138


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Barry MJ, Roberts RG. Indications for PSA testing. JAMA. 1997; 277:955-6.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

bulletInclude no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

bulletType with double-spacing

bulletSend three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Barry, M. J.
space
  arrow  Coley, C. M.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online