Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Hennessy, B. J.
space
  arrow  Crotty, G. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Predicting Death in Mechanically Ventilated Recipients of Bone Marrow Transplants

right arrow Brian J. Hennessy, MB; Mary White, MB; and Gerard M. Crotty, MB

1 July 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 1 | Page 88


TO THE EDITOR:

Rubenfeld and Crawford [1] describe the experience of Seattle's 865 bone marrow transplant recipients who required mechanical ventilation. They propose the introduction of evidence-based guidelines for ventilatory support after transplantation. Their study sample represents the largest cohort to date, and their study consolidates the findings of previous studies. The guidelines represent a reasonable and logical approach to patients with an extremely low survival rate.

In the past 7 years, 141 patients received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in our center. Fifteen percent (n = 21) of patients required mechanical ventilation for lung injury; all 21 of these patients died. The rate of transfer to the intensive care unit from the transplantation unit (15%) compares favorably with the rates in other series: 25% [1], 33% [2], and 40% [3]. The duration of stay in the intensive care unit ranged from 1 to 44 days (median, 12 days). Rubenfeld and Crawford point out that their study was limited to patients who were followed for no more than 100 days after bone marrow transplantation. However, we studied patients for as long as 17 months after transplantation (median, 3 months) and found no evidence of an improved survival rate in patients who had had transplantation more than 100 days previously.

We welcome the guidelines that predict outcome in the first 4 days in the intensive care unit. Adherence to guidelines may spare unnecessary prolongation of suffering for both patients and relatives, with consequent saving of valuable resources. In view of the variation in transfer rates among centers, we suggest that guidelines for initial transfer to the intensive care unit would be a valuable addition to the above.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

St. James's Hospital; Dublin 8, Ireland


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Rubenfeld GD, Crawford SW. Withdrawing life support from mechanically ventilated recipients of bone marrow transplants: a case for evidence-based guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125:625-33.

2. Denardo SJ, Oye RK, Bellamy PE. Efficacy of intensive care for bone marrow transplant patients with respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1989; 17:4-6.

3. Torrecelia C, Cortes JL, Chamorro C, Rubio JJ, Dominquez de Villota E. Prognostic assessment of the acute complications of bone marrow transplantation requiring intensive therapy. Intens Care Med. 1988; 14:393-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
E. S. Mittra, R. D. Niederkohr, C. Rodriguez, T. El-Maghraby, and I. R. McDougall
Uncommon Causes of Thyrotoxicosis
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 265 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Hennessy, B. J.
space
  arrow  Crotty, G. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online