Article
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Google Scholar
|
|
|
PubMed
|
|
|
|
LETTER
Fluconazole Suspension for Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Unresponsive to Tablets
Marcelo D. Martins, MD, and
John H. Rex, MD
15 February 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 4 | Pages 332-333
TO THE EDITOR:
While receiving the intermittent or continuous therapy that is required to treat relapses of oropharyngeal candidiasis, as many as 5% to 10% of patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection develop an infection that is clinically or microbiologically resistant to 100 to 200 mg of fluconazole per day [1]. Fluconazole is now available in a suspension of 10 or 40 mg/mL, and we hypothesized that the high salivary levels that are associated with use in a swish-and-swallow format [2] might overcome resistance in some patients.
Patient 1 was a 43-year-old man who had a recent CD4+ T-cell count of 7 cells/mm3 and a history of several opportunistic infections. The patient presented in July 1996 with recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis that had been refractory to 10 days of therapy with fluconazole tablets (200 mg daily). His symptoms resolved while he received fluconazole suspension at 100 mg twice daily, although a few white plaques that yielded Candida organisms remained in his oropharynx (Table 1).
Patient 2 was a 36-year-old man who had a recent CD4+ T-cell count of 4 cells/mm3 and a history of several opportunistic infections. The patient presented in September 1996 with relapsing oropharyngeal candidiasis that was refractory to 10 days of therapy with fluconazole tablets (200 mg daily). Symptoms immediately resolved when the patient began receiving fluconazole suspension at 100 mg twice daily, and Candida organisms could no longer be cultured from his oropharynx (Table 1).
These two HIV-infected patients had oropharyngeal candidiasis that was unresponsive to fluconazole and that responded rapidly to a change in fluconazole therapy from tablets to suspension. Patient 1 was infected with microbiologically resistant (minimal inhibitory concentration >64 µg/mL) Candida organisms, and his response was characterized by persistent asymptomatic (but visible) oropharyngeal disease. Patient 2 was infected with microbiologically susceptible Candida organisms and was apparently not responding to therapy because of an inadequate immune response. Both patients complied with therapy, and neither was taking rifampin. At least in some patients, fluconazole suspension taken in a swish-and-swallow format may be a convenient approach to the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis that is unresponsive to fluconazole tablets.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX 77030
1. Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39:1-8.
2. Laufen H, Yeates RA, Zimmermann T, de los Reyes C. Pharmacokinetic optimization of the treatment of oral candidiasis with fluconazole: studies with a suspension. Drug Exp Clin Res. 1995; 21:23-8.
3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: proposed standard. M27-T. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1995.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
Article
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Google Scholar
|
|
|
PubMed
|
|
|
|