Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Nickens, H.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

REPLY

Race and Ethnicity: A Compelling Research Agenda

right arrow Herbert Nickens, MD, MA

1 February 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 3 | Page 252


IN RESPONSE:

Dr. Bauer misunderstands my reference to affirmative action and by extension reveals a misunderstanding of the reality of racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. In my view, Dr. Bauer makes at least two mistakes.

First, my comment did not so much express support for affirmative action as point out that our society is currently engaged in a fierce debate about affirmative action; one of the core disagreements in that debate is whether race or ethnicity is still a relevant way to distinguish among persons or whether our society has become race-blind. The three articles on which my editorial commented made it clear that with regard to medical outcomes, race is clearly still a relevant, and indeed powerful, way to distinguish among persons.

Second, race as a medical reality and race as a sociopolitical reality are not "apples and oranges"; Dr. Bauer is creating a false dichotomy. The contribution of genetically based racial differences to health status differentials is trivial compared with the contribution of differences that are driven by sociopolitical realities: Disparate educational attainment, income levels, and access to health care and ongoing discrimination are all powerful sociopolitical drivers of medical outcomes. Moreover, it is race as a sociopolitical construct that creates the well-documented, persistent, and pervasive racial differences in the use of medical services and procedures even after adjustment for financial barriers and prevalence of disease [1, 2].

Finally, the last sentence of Dr. Bauer's letter requires comment. The juxtaposition of "scientific integrity" and "political policy" is, once again, a false dichotomy. The reductionistic view that science can somehow be artificially set apart from society or politics is manifestly false, especially when the object of study is minority health status. In looking at hypertension, for example, one may prefer to examine arterioles rather than the experience of discrimination, but integrating both the biological and the social is likely to produce more profound insights [3]. We cannot begin to understand minority health status unless we accept the complex interactions between biology and sociology.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20037


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, Schwartz JS. Racial differences in the elderly's use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83:948-54.

2. Gornick ME, Eggers PW, Reilly TW, Mentnech RM, Fitterman LK, Kucken LE, et al. Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:791-9.

3. Krieger N, Sidney S. Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA study of young black and white adults. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86:1370-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Nickens, H.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online