REPLY
Race and Ethnicity: A Compelling Research Agenda
Herbert Nickens, MD, MA
1 February 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 3 | Page 252
IN RESPONSE:
Dr. Bauer misunderstands my reference to affirmative action and by extension reveals a misunderstanding of the reality of racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. In my view, Dr. Bauer makes at least two mistakes.
First, my comment did not so much express support for affirmative action as point out that our society is currently engaged in a fierce debate about affirmative action; one of the core disagreements in that debate is whether race or ethnicity is still a relevant way to distinguish among persons or whether our society has become race-blind. The three articles on which my editorial commented made it clear that with regard to medical outcomes, race is clearly still a relevant, and indeed powerful, way to distinguish among persons.
Second, race as a medical reality and race as a sociopolitical reality are not "apples and oranges"; Dr. Bauer is creating a false dichotomy. The contribution of genetically based racial differences to health status differentials is trivial compared with the contribution of differences that are driven by sociopolitical realities: Disparate educational attainment, income levels, and access to health care and ongoing discrimination are all powerful sociopolitical drivers of medical outcomes. Moreover, it is race as a sociopolitical construct that creates the well-documented, persistent, and pervasive racial differences in the use of medical services and procedures even after adjustment for financial barriers and prevalence of disease [1, 2].
Finally, the last sentence of Dr. Bauer's letter requires comment. The juxtaposition of "scientific integrity" and "political policy" is, once again, a false dichotomy. The reductionistic view that science can somehow be artificially set apart from society or politics is manifestly false, especially when the object of study is minority health status. In looking at hypertension, for example, one may prefer to examine arterioles rather than the experience of discrimination, but integrating both the biological and the social is likely to produce more profound insights [3]. We cannot begin to understand minority health status unless we accept the complex interactions between biology and sociology.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20037
1. Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, Schwartz JS. Racial differences in the elderly's use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83:948-54.
2. Gornick ME, Eggers PW, Reilly TW, Mentnech RM, Fitterman LK, Kucken LE, et al. Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:791-9.
3. Krieger N, Sidney S. Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA study of young black and white adults. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86:1370-8.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.