LETTER
Pancreatitis, Hyperlipidemia, and Pregnancy in Two Sisters
Stanley H. Hsia, MD;
Philip W. Connelly, PhD; and
Robert A. Hegele, MD
1 January 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 1 | Pages 88-89
TO THE EDITOR:
We read with great interest Kielson and colleagues' report [1] of severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis associated with pregnancy and the administration of cholestyramine in two sisters heterozygous for the missense mutation Gly
Glu at position 188 of the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene. The medical care and subsequent molecular characterization of these sisters were excellent. However, both homozygosity and heterozygosity for this same mutation have been reported to be associated with pregnancy-induced pancreatitis [2, 3]. The mechanism was presumed to be an estrogen-related exacerbation of a preexisting lipolytic defect of triglyceride clearance. However, this mutation alone clearly cannot account for the phenotype because all other female relatives who were carriers did not become chylomicronemic with pregnancy [2, 3].
Furthermore, the severe hypertriglyceridemia of pregnancy is not always caused by a structural abnormality of LPL. We recently described a woman with severe hypertriglyceridemia associated with pregnancy at the eighth week of gestation. After the administration of heparin, lipolytic activity in the nonpregnant state was normal in this patient; the coding sequence of her LPL gene was also normal [4]. However, our patient was a compound heterozygote for the apolipoprotein E4/2 genotype. Others have shown that the presence of variant isoforms of apolipoprotein E may contribute to hypertriglyceridemia [5], but as discussed by Kielson and colleagues, variant apolipoprotein E is not sufficient to cause the phenotype.
These exceptions show that heterozygosity for variant LPL, apolipoprotein E, or both is not necessary or sufficient for the explanation of severe pregnancy-induced hyperlipidemia. We suggest that the LPL mutation in the sisters described by Kielson and colleagues was ascertained because LPL was a good candidate gene and that the mutation was not the sole cause of the phenotype. A second variant genetic locus causing increased hormone-dependent synthesis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins could possibly complete the explanation for hypertriglyceridemia in these patients.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1. Kielson LM, Vary CP, Sprecher DL, Renfrew R. Hyperlipidemia and pancreatitis during pregnancy in two sisters with a mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124:425-8.
2. Hegele RA, Little JA, Connelly PW. Heterozygosity for mutant lipoprotein lipase in pregnancy-induced hypertriglyceridemia [Abstract]. Clin Res. 1991; 39:665A.
3. Sanderson SL, Iverius PH, Wilson DE. Successful hyperlipemic pregnancy. JAMA. 1991; 265:1858-60.
4. Hsia SH, Connelly PW, Hegele RA. Successful outcome in severe pregnancy-associated hyperlipemia: a case report and literature review. Am J Med Sci. 1995; 309:213-8.
5. Ma Y, Ooi TC, Liu MS, Zhang H, McPherson R, Edwards AL, et al. High frequency of mutations in the human lipoprotein lipase gene in pregnancy-induced chylomicronemia: possible association with apolipoprotein E2 isoform. J Lipid Res. 1994; 35:1066-75.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.