Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 October 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 7 | Page 623
With the availability of new pharmacologic agents, the drug industry is currently pressuring the scientific and medical communities to increase drug therapy for osteoporosis. One element of this commercial campaign is to simplify the treatment decision by use of a bone mineral density (BMD) cutoffa value 2.5 SDs below the BMD of a 30-year-old, normal person ( 2.5 t-score).
This plan is ill advised. The 2.5 t-score was developed by the World Health Organization as a diagnostic threshold for population studies to provide a benchmark for estimating the prevalence of osteoporosis in various countries. It was not intended to be the sole clinical criterion for determining drug treatment. Intervention thresholds differ from diagnostic thresholds.
Bone mineral density should not be the only criterion for drug treatment. Treatment decisions should be based on multiple clinical factors, including BMD. Further, no single BMD cutoff should be used. Bone mineral density provides a useful measure of the risk for fracture; the risk gradient approximately doubles for each 10% to 12% decrease in BMD. Physicians who plan to treat patients with osteoporosis must obtain special knowledge about interpreting bone densitometry reports and must understand the complexities of osteoporosis and its proper diagnosis and treatment. Only then can they responsibly initiate therapy and successfully manage this disorder.
These views are supported by leading members of other organizations, including the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the National Osteoporosis Foundation.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
LETTER
Use of Bone Densitometry Results for Decisions about Therapy for Osteoporosis
TO THE EDITOR:
Author and Article Information
![]()
Top
Author & Article Info
Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94611
Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO 80227
Oregon Osteoporosis Research Center, Portland, OR 97213
![]()
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||