Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Fang, F. C.
space
  arrow  Peterson, L. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Colitis

right arrow Ferric C. Fang, MD; Dale N. Gerding, MD; and Lance R. Peterson, MD

15 September 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 6 | Page 515


TO THE EDITOR:

We thank Manabe and colleagues [1] for their careful examination of the diagnostic aspects of C. difficile diarrhea. Although the case definition required a positive toxin assay result, the sensitivity of a single cytotoxin assay was only 79%. Using different case criteria, other investigators have found the sensitivity of cytotoxin assay to range from 67% to 74% [2].

Manabe and coworkers report that diagnostic sensitivity may be increased by obtaining two to three serial stool specimens for cytotoxin assay. However, Aronsson and colleagues [3] reported that additional specimens increase the rate of detection by only 10%. We suggest the combination of cytotoxin assay and toxigenic culture of the initial specimen as a useful alternative solution to this problem [2] that prevents the need for submitting multiple specimens. If the result of the direct cytotoxin assay is negative and C. difficile is identified on selective medium, the isolate should be tested for elaboration of cytotoxin in vitro. Confirmation of toxigenicity is important because nontoxigenic C. difficile strains are not pathogenic. The addition of culture improves the sensitivity of laboratory diagnosis to as high as 96% [2] and permits strain typing of individual isolates. The latter facilitates recognition of outbreaks of nosocomial infection [4].

We have found this combined diagnostic approach to be convenient, efficient, cost-effective, and reasonably rapid (cytotoxin assays may be completed in 24 hours; toxigenic cultures, in 4 to 5 days). At the University of Colorado, 41 of 120 culture-confirmed cases of C. difficile diarrhea were cytotoxin negative during a 12-month period. Similarly, at Northwestern University's Memorial Hospital, 61 of 160 cases detected during a 6-month period were cytotoxin negative. Because we and others [5] have seen patients who have this disorder but no positive result on direct-stool cytotoxin assay progress to pancolitis or even death, clinicians must recognize the limited sensitivity of cytotoxin assays and the potential utility of culture for the diagnosis of C. difficile diarrhea.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
Chicago Lakeside Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60611


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Manabe YC, Vinetz JM, Moore RD, Merz C, Charache P, Bartlett JG.Clostridium difficile colitis: an efficient clinical approach to diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:835-40.

2. Peterson LR, Kelly PJ. The role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in the management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1993; 7:277-93.

3. Aronsson B, Mollby R, Nord CE. Diagnosis and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in Sweden. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984; 14(Suppl D):85-95.

4. Gerding DN, Johnson S, Peterson LR, Mulligan ME, Silva J.Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: SHEA position paper. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16:459-88.

5. Lashner BA, Todorczuk J, Sahm DF, Hanauer SB.Clostridium difficile culture-positive toxin-negative diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986; 81:940-3.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Fang, F. C.
space
  arrow  Peterson, L. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online