Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Buxton, A. E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Coronary Artery Disease: Relation to Inducible Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

right arrow Alfred E. Buxton, MD; Kerry L. Lee, PhD; Lorenzo DiCarlo, MD; Debra S. Echt, MD; John D. Fisher, MD; G. Stephen Greer, MD; Mark E. Josephson, MD; Douglas Packer, MD; Eric N. Prystowsky, MD; Mario Talajic, MD, for the MUSTT Investigators*

1 July 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 1 | Pages 35-39

Background: Many physicians believe that electrocardiographic characteristics of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia correlate with the risk for sudden death in survivors of myocardial infarction. Sustained ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation has also been shown to predict sudden death.

*For a list of additional MUSTT investigators, see the Appendix.

Objective: To determine whether electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia can predict the inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease having abnormal ventricular function.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: 70 clinical electrophysiology laboratories in the United States and Canada.

Patients: 1480 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less, and asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.

Intervention: Electrophysiologic study attempting to induce sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Measurements: Daily frequency, duration, and cycle length of spontaneous episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, measured by standard electrocardiographic recordings.

Results: No statistically significant difference in the frequency or duration of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was seen between patients with and those without inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Rates of spontaneous tachycardia were slightly slower in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia than in patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia (P = 0.047), but the difference was not clinically significant.

Conclusion: Electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia do not predict which patients with coronary artery disease will have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Ann Intern.Med. 1996; 125:35-39.


Most sudden deaths in patients with previous myocardial infarction are initiated by ventricular tachycardia. Frequent and complex ventricular ectopy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia have long been recognized as independent predictors of cardiac-related death after myocardial infarction [1-7]. The relation between ventricular arrhythmias and death has been shown in both the pre- and post-thrombolytic era [7]. Many physicians believe that patients with more frequent, longer, or faster episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia have a higher risk for sudden death. However, earlier studies have not shown a relation between electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia episodes—such as rate, duration, or frequency—and the risk for sudden cardiac death in survivors of infarction [3, 8].

Sustained ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation has been shown to predict death—specifically sudden death—in myocardial infarction survivors who have reduced ventricular function and present with asymptomatic ventricular ectopy or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia [9-12]. We evaluated whether electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia could predict the inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation in a large sample of patients with documented coronary artery disease, reduced ventricular function, and spontaneous asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.


Methods
space
up arrowTop
dotMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Patients

We did an analysis of the first 1480 patients enrolled in the ongoing Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), which is testing whether electrophysiologically guided anti-arrhythmic therapy can reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. The major criteria for trial entry are documented coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less, and asymptomatic spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The protocol is described elsewhere [13].

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia is defined as three or more consecutive premature ventricular complexes that last no more than 30 seconds and terminate spontaneously. At least two consecutive cycles must last 550 milliseconds or less (equivalent to more than equals 110 beats/min), and the average rate of the entire episode must be more than 100 beats/min. The qualifying nonsustained ventricular tachycardia must have been documented within 6 months before entry into the trial. In addition, the qualifying tachycardia must have occurred at least 4 days after the most recent myocardial infarction, coronary bypass grafting, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The qualifying tachycardia must not have been attributable to transient metabolic abnormalities such as myocardial ischemia and must not have produced symptoms severe enough to warrant treatment. All patients have at least 18 hours of analyzable continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.

Electrophysiologic Studies

The protocol for programmed electrical stimulation, standardized at all participating centers, includes delivery of 1, 2, and 3 ventricular extrastimuli at two right ventricular sites at pacing cycle lengths of 600 and 400 milliseconds. In addition, bursts of 5 to 15 ventricular stimuli at cycle lengths of 350 to 250 milliseconds are delivered. The end point for the stimulation protocol is the reproducible induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation or completion of the protocol.

Data Abstraction

Patient data, including characteristics of the spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, are reported to the data coordinating center. The electrocardiographic characteristics of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia episodes are assessed and reported by individual investigators. To assure that the qualifying nonsustained ventricular tachycardia meets the entry criteria, the recordings of every episode of qualifying nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are reviewed by executive committee members who are blinded to other patient characteristics.

For our study, accuracy of the nonsustained ventricular tachycardia characteristics recorded by the participating investigators was checked in several additional ways. Electrocardiograms in a subset of data from 222 patients were reviewed. We also reviewed 1) all electrocardiographic tracings of patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia submitted by the eight study sites enrolling the most patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia and 2) data from a random sample of 3 patients without inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia from each study site. The rate and duration of ventricular tachycardia reported on the data forms were compared with the rate of ventricular tachycardia on the submitted electrocardiograms, as measured by one author.

Statistical Analysis

Characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were summarized in patients with and those without inducible monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia using the median and the 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles. The distributions of each characteristic in these two groups (inducible and noninducible) were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test [14].

Further statistical assessment of the relation of characteristics of the spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia with inducibility was done using logistic regression analysis. Inducibility during programmed electrical stimulation was the outcome variable, and characteristics of the nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were predictor variables. The relation between each predictor variable and inducible ventricular tachycardia was considered individually and jointly. To accommodate possible nonlinear relations between these predictors and inducibility, a flexible model-fitting approach involving cubic splines (piecewise cubic polynomials) was used [15, 16]. Characteristics of the nonsustained ventricular tachycardia examined in these regression analyses included mean duration of the episodes documented, duration of the longest episode, mean rate of the episodes, and mean number of episodes per day. The ability of these characteristics (individually or jointly) to accurately predict inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or discriminate between patients who did and did not have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia with programmed stimulation was quantitated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve [17]. An area under the ROC curve near 0.5 indicates that predictions of inducibility made using characteristics of the nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are essentially random with respect to actual inducibility. An area under the ROC curve near 1.0 indicates that the predictions correctly discriminate between patients who did and did not have inducible ventricular tachycardia.


Results
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
dotResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Data were analyzed from the first 1480 consecutive patients enrolled in the trial. Of these patients, 438 (30%) had inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, and 1042 (70%) did not.

When the electrocardiographic tracings in the subset of 222 patients were reviewed, the cycle length and duration of the recordings of qualifying nonsustained ventricular tachycardia compared with the values reported on the case report form showed a mean difference in cycle length of only 25 milliseconds. The median duration of episodes in the sample was five beats, the same as the entire population. Thus, the submitted sample data were very close to the data reported by individual investigators on the case report forms.

Spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia qualifying patients for study entry was discovered during in-hospital telemetric electrocardiography in 793 (53%) of the 1480 patients, by continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) recording in 609 (41%), during exercise electrocardiography in 39 (3%), and in the course of recording a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in 25 (2%). One episode was documented by a transtelephonic event recorder, and the source of the documentation could not be obtained in 13 patients.

The median duration of all recorded episodes of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was five complexes. The median value for the longest episode of documented nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was seven complexes. The median value for the mean cycle length of recorded episodes of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was 420 milliseconds (equivalent to a rate of 143 beats/min). The median frequency of documented nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was two episodes per day (mode, 1 episode/d).

Morphologic data on the spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are limited. Nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was recorded in 86% of patients, and polymorphic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was recorded in 34% of patients (some patients had both events). However, the accuracy of the morphologic classification is compromised by the fact that spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was recorded on two electrocardiographic leads in 75% of patients (12-lead electrocardiograms of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are rarely available).

No significant differences were seen between patients with and those without inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in the distributions of the electrocardiographic characteristics, except for a slightly higher rate of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients without inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (Table 1). The magnitude of difference in rates is small, and there is such considerable overlap in the heart rate distributions in both patient groups that the difference is not clinically useful.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Spontaneous Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia*

 

No relations between characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia with inducibility were significant by logistic regression analysis, except for the mean rate variable (Table 2). However, even for this characteristic, the relation does not provide the ability to accurately discriminate between patients who have inducible ventricular tachycardia and those who do not, as quantified by the area under the ROC curve (Table 2). Even when all four characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were considered together in a regression model to predict inducibility, the area under the ROC curve was only 0.552, reflecting almost no predictive ability. When any inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (monomorphic or polymorphic) was considered as the measure of inducibility, the results were similar.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Logistic Regression Analysis of the Relation between Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Spontaneous Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia and Inducible Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia*

 


Discussion
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
dotDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Counter to intuition, electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease cannot differentiate between patients with and those without sustained ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed stimulation in the electrophysiology laboratory. The importance of this finding lies in the fact that programmed stimulation is one of the best techniques for identifying patients with coronary artery disease who are at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Other tests, such as measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and the ambulatory electrocardiogram, can predict overall cardiac-related death but not whether death will or will not occur suddenly. Thus, these other tests cannot identify patients likely to benefit from antiarrhythmic therapy. In contrast, previous studies [9-12] have associated the presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia with an excess of sudden, as opposed to nonsudden, deaths. The signal-averaged electrocardiogram has yet to be tested prospectively in a large sample of patients with the characteristics of our study participants.

The noted electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are remarkably similar to those reported in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) [8]. We have confirmed that most episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease who are at high risk for sudden cardiac death are brief and occur infrequently. An analysis of cardiac arrest in CAST showed no electrocardiographic characteristic of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia that distinguished patients who had had cardiac arrest from those who had not. This result was similar to that of a previous analysis that did not control anti-arrhythmic therapy in survivors with acute infarction [3].

Limitations

We did not use a core laboratory to analyze the Holter tapes. Investigators at each study site reviewed the electrocardiographic data and reported it on forms for entry into the computer database. Although analysis of Holter tapes by a core laboratory might have increased data accuracy, our study funds were insufficient to pay for Holter recording or analysis. Various recording systems were used: The systems in use depended on the study site and its referral sources. Despite this limitation, our findings are remarkably similar to those of previous studies that did use core laboratories. One advantage of our methods is that our data reflect the results that are likely to occur in actual clinical practice. Thus, these results should be generalizable to the entire patient sample meeting the study's entry criteria.

A second limitation, noted previously, is that with current technology, most episodes of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia can only be recorded on one or two electrocardiographic leads. This limits our ability to accurately describe the morphologic characteristics of such arrhythmias.

Conclusions

No electrocardiographic characteristic of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia can accurately predict whether patients will have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Thus, we conclude that the rate, duration, and frequency of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with abnormal left ventricular function caused by coronary artery disease cannot be used to make clinical decisions about the use of electrophysiologic studies for risk stratification.


Appendix: MUSTT Trial Investigators
space

Dr. Lee: Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) Data Coordinating Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3363, Durham, NC 27710.

Dr. DiCarlo: Michigan Heart P.C., 5325 Elliott Drive, Suite 203, Ypsilanti, MI 48197.

Dr. Echt: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Cardiology Division, Room 315 MRB II, Nashville, TN 37232.

Dr. Fisher: Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Henry & Lucy Moss Hospital Division, 11 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467.

Dr. Greer: Arkansas Cardiology Clinic, Suite 600, Medical Towers II, 9501 Lile Drive, Little Rock, AR 72205.

Dr. Josephson: Division of Cardiology, RW 453, The Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215.

Dr. Packer: Mayo Clinic, 1216 2nd Street, Southwest, 4-416 Alfred Building, Rochester, MN 55905.

Dr. Prystowsky: Northside Cardiology, St. Vincent Professional Building, 8402 Harcourt Road, Suite 228, Indianapolis, IN 46260.

Dr. Talajic: Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 East Belanger Street, Montreal, Quebec H1T1C8, Canada.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

With the technical assistance of Gail E. Hafley, MS, and Pamela M. Smith, RN
Grant Support: By grants UO1 HL45700 and UO1 HL45726 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, and by grants from C.R. Bard; Berlex Laboratories; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; Cardiac Pacemakers/Guidant; Knoll Pharmaceutical; Medtronic; Searle Pharmaceutical; Ventritex; and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories.
Requests for Reprints: Alfred E. Buxton, MD, Cardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Buxton: Cardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140.


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. de Soyza N, Bennett FA, Murphy ML, Bissett JK, Kane JJ. The relationship of paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia complicating the acute phase and ventricular arrhythmia during the late hospital phase of myocardial infarction to long-term survival. Am J Med. 1978; 64:377-81.

2. Anderson KP, DeCamilla J, Moss AJ. Clinical significance of ventricular tachycardia (3 beats or longer) detected during ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1978; 57:890-7.

3. Bigger JT Jr, Weld FM, Rolnitzky LM. Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular tachycardia (three or more complexes) detected with ambulatory electrocardiographic recording in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1981; 48:815-23.[Medline]

4. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Thanavaro S, Province MA, Martin TF, Oliver GC. Relationship between clinical features of acute myocardial infarction and ventricular runs 2 weeks to 1 year after infarction. Circulation. 1981; 63:64-70.

5. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, Miller JP, Rolnitzky LM. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984; 69:250-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM. Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recordings in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 58:1151-60.[Medline]

7. Maggioni AP, Zuanetti G, Franzosi MG, Rovelli F, Santoro E, Staszewsky L, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction in the fibrinolytic era. GISSI-2 results. Circulation. 1993; 87:312-22.

8. Denes P, Gillis AM, Pawitan Y, Kammerling JM, Wilhelmsen L, Salerno DM. Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular premature complexes and ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recording in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68:887-96.

9. Gomes JA, Hariman RI, Kang PS, El-Sherif N, Chowdhry I, Lyons J. Programmed electrical stimulation in patients with high-grade ventricular ectopy: electrophysiologic findings and prognosis for survival. Circulation. 1984; 70:43-51.

10. Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Flores BT, Miller JM, Doherty JU, Josephson ME. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: role of electrophysiologic study. Circulation. 1987; 75:1178-85.

11. Klein RC, Machell C. Use of electrophysiologic testing in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: prognostic and therapeutic Implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14:155-61.

12. Wilber DJ, Olshansky B, Moran JF, Scanlon PJ. Electrophysiological testing and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Use and limitations in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function. Circulation. 1990; 82:350-8.

13. Buxton AE, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, Lee KL, Pryor DB, Prystowsky EN, et al. Prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease: the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1993; 36:215-26.

14. Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. San Francisco: Holden-Day; 1974.

15. Smith PL. Splines as a useful and convenient statistical tool. American Statistician. 1979; 33:57-62.

16. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Pollock BG. Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988; 80:1198-202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143:29-36.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): e247 - e346.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Writing Committee Members, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 746 - 837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Lorenz, C. Junger, K. Seidl, A. Gitt, S. Schneider, R. Schiele, H. Wienbergen, R. Winkler, M. Gottwik, W. Delius, et al.
Do statins influence the prognostic impact of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia after ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2005; 26(11): 1078 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L Jordaens, R Tavernier, and MIRRACLE Investigators
Determinants of sudden death after discharge from hospital for myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2001; 22(14): 1214 - 1225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Schmitt, P. Barthel, G. Ndrepepa, J.u. Schreieck, A. Plewan, A. Schomig, and G. Schmidt
Value of programmed ventricular stimulation for prophylactic internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in postinfarction patients preselected by noninvasive risk stratifiers
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1901 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
K. Glatter and L. B. Liem
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Current Progress and Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 162 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. E. Buxton, K. L. Lee, J. D. Fisher, M. E. Josephson, E. N. Prystowsky, G. Hafley, and The Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Inve
A Randomized Study of the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., December 16, 1999; 341(25): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.M Pratt, A.J Camm, J.T Bigger Jr, G Breithardt, R.W.F Campbell, A.E Epstein, L.J Kappenberger, K.-H Kuck, S Pocock, S Saksena, et al.
Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in patients with an ICD. Unlimited potential or replete with complexity and problems?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 1999; 20(21): 1538 - 1552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. Welch, R. L. Page, and M. H. Hamdan
Management of ventricular arrhythmias: A trial-based approach
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 621 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. E. Buxton, G. E. Hafley, M. H. Lehmann, M. Gold, M. O'Toole, A. Tang, J. Coromilas, B. Hook, N. J. Stamato, and K. L. Lee
Prediction of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Inducible by Programmed Stimulation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : Utility of Clinical Variables
Circulation, April 13, 1999; 99(14): 1843 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Spontaneous Tachycardia and Sudden Death
Journal Watch Cardiology, October 1, 1996; 1996(1001): 10 - 10.
[Full Text]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Buxton, A. E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online