LETTER
Internet Medical Resources
Robert H. Dolin, MD
1 February 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 3 | Page 375
TO THE EDITOR:
Dr. Glowniak [1] presents a somewhat toneddown view of the Internet compared with that expressed in an earlier article in which he stated "The Internet has evolved ... to an information resource from which nearly all physicians can benefit. The medical applications on the Internet have become an unparalleled information resource that can be of great value to researchers, educators, and clinicians" [2]. The message in his Annals article is that "computer networks in general and the Internet in particular are likely to play more important roles in many aspects of medicine in the future." However, many challenges must be addressed before the Internet achieves its potential as a truly rich informational resource for practicing physicians. Although it has been shown that the amount of clinically useful information available electronically remains lacking [3], an increasing amount of information is becoming available on the Internet.
Finding relevant information on the Internet with a reasonable search sensitivity and specificity, however, does require some Internet familiarity. Internet search engines may only index data from a particular format such as gopher or the World Wide Web. The index terms may be taken from the document title, the source, the entire text, or keywords not necessarily drawn from any standardized medical terminology. Available search engines do not enable users to determine the quality or reliability of the resources found.
These issues are being actively pursued. Patrick and Springer [4] have described a scheme for classify biomedical Internet servers based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine provides a way to translate among the various medical terminologies used to index information. Its Information Sources Map categorizes information sources by content, intended audience, subject coverage, and other categories [5]. In 1986, the National Library of Medicine envisioned a mechanism whereby providers could transparently access vast quantities of clinically relevant information. Although today's Internet is providing the electronic highway, many street signs remain under construction.
|
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine; Los Angeles, CA 90024
1. Glowniak JV. Medical resources on the Internet. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:123-31.
2. Glowniak JV, Bushway MK. Computer networks as a medical resource: Accessing and using the Internet. JAMA. 1994; 271:1933-9.
3. Giuse NB, Huber JT, Giuse DA, Brown CW, Bankowitz RA, Hunt S. Information needs of health care professionals in an AIDS outpatient clinic as determined by chart review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1994; 1:395-403.
4. Patrick TB, Springer GK. Classifying and identifying servers for biomedical information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1994;93-7.
5. Miller PL, Frawley SJ, Wright L, Roderer NK, Powsner SM. Lessons learned from a pilot implementation of the UMLS Information Sources Map. Journal of the American Medical Informaties Association. 1995; 2:102-15.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.