Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Shaner, D. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

CPR-Not-Indicated and Futility

right arrow D. Malcolm Shaner, MD

1 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 1 Part 1 | Page 76


TO THE EDITOR:

Waisel and Truog [1] suggest that the medical decisions of physicians can be neatly separated from the value judgments that patients should make. By their reasoning, almost every patient whose surrogate claims that the patient would want CPR against the advice of their physician should receive it because the decision is partly a value judgment.

Let us admit that the decision to stop CPR is also value laden. It is not always medically clear when to stop resuscitation attempts. The heart and lungs of the permanently unconscious or terminally ill patient may be just one more chest compression away from recovery. Would Waisel and Truog suggest that we ask each patient or surrogate exactly how long they would like resuscitation attempts to be continued? If physicians cannot make value judgments regarding when to start CPR, certainly we should not be making value judgments regarding when to stop it.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowREFERENCE

Southern California Permanente Medical Group; Los Angeles, CA 90034


REFERENCE
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotREFERENCE

1. Waisel DB, Truog RD. The cardiopulmonary resuscitation-not-indicated order: futility revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122:304-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Shaner, D. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online