Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  McKenna, M. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Bone Mineral Density in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

right arrow Malachi J. McKenna, MD

1 November 1995 | Volume 123 Issue 9 | Page 731


TO THE EDITOR:

Dr. van Daele and colleagues [1] have provided further evidence to support an association between non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and increased bone mineral density. They speculate that this is an anabolic effect of insulin but did not acknowledge the information on bone biochemistry and bone histomorphometry that suggests a reduction in bone formation rather than an anabolic effect [2-5]. A reduction in bone turn-over could account both for patients' failure to accumulate bone during bone growth (yielding a low bone density in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) and also for diminution of age-related bone loss in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus—a unifying hypothesis for the effect of diabetes mellitus on bone [3-5].

A state of low bone turnover facilitates the accumulation of microdamage in bone and thus increases the risk for stress fractures. We have speculated about whether this microdamage might predispose patients with diabetes mellitus to foot fractures [3-5]. Dr. van Daele and associates found a lower prevalence of nonvertebral fractures in women than in controls. This lower prevalence was not seen with men. The authors mention that the ankle and foot were the most common sites of fracture in men and the second most common sites in women. Did these patients have stress fractures? Did stress fractures in the foot occur more frequently than in controls?


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

St. Michael's Hospital; Dublin Ireland.


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1.  van Daele PL, Stolk RP, Burger H, Algra D, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, et al. Bone density in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Rotterdam Study. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122:409-14.

2.  Wu K, Schubeck E, Frost HM, Villaneuva A. Haversian bone formation rates determined by a new method in a mastodon, and in diabetes mellitus, and in osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res. 1970; 6:204-9.

3.  McKenna MJ. Miscellaneous causes of osteoporosis. In: Favus MJ, ed. Primer on Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism. New York: Raven Pr; 1993:258-62.

4.  Krakauer JC, McKenna MJ, Rao DS, Fenn NS, Parfitt AM, Whitehouse FW. Long term preservation of bone mass in diabetes mellitus. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993; 52(Suppl 2):S27.

5.  Krakauer J, McKenna MJ, Buderer NF, Rao DS, Whitehouse FW, Parfitt AM. Bone loss and bone turnover in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1995; 44:775-82.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Physicians.