Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Cohen, M. H.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

LETTER

Megestrol for AIDS-Related Anorexia

right arrow Martin H. Cohen

1 June 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 11 | Pages 879-881


TO THE EDITOR:

Two recent double-blind, randomized trials suggest that megestrol is effective for AIDS-related cachexia [1, 2]. Von Roenn and colleagues [1] concluded that megestrol should be considered for all patients with AIDS and a persistent weight loss of 5% or more of ideal body weight. This conclusion raises several concerns. The first centers on the persistence of objective and subjective improvement. Both studies were of 12 weeks' duration. In one [2], 52% of patients receiving megestrol discontinued treatment during the 12-week period. Comparable data were not provided by the other study. Neither study stated how many patients continued megestrol therapy beyond 12 weeks. Data from patients with cancer indicate that weight gain rapidly reverses after discontinuation of nutritional therapy [3]. Consequently, it is possible that megestrol treatment, unless continued, produces only transitory increases in weight and well-being.

The second issue concerns changes in body composition after megestrol treatment. In both studies, weight gain was primarily caused by increased fat storage. Lean body mass in patients receiving megestrol decreased in one study [2] and increased by 1.14 kg in the other [1]. Lean body mass is known to be an important predictor of mortality. In patients with AIDS, death occurs when lean body mass decreases to 54% of normal [4]. On the basis of these findings, it might be predicted that megestrol would not prolong survival; indeed, it did not.

The third issue concerns whether an increase in body fat, a major therapeutic effect of megestrol, is beneficial. Similarly, Murray and Murray [5] persuasively argued that starvation suppresses infection and that refeeding activates infection. Weight loss may be a host defense mechanism in AIDS. If so, interventions should be aimed at maintaining, but not increasing, weight. The fact that infectious complications did not increase in patients receiving megestrol may be related to the short duration of therapy.

Megestrol seems to be an expensive way to make patients feel better about their appearance, appetite, enjoyment of eating, and, to a lesser extent, quality of life. Whether maintenance of this benefit will require lifetime megestrol treatment is unknown, as is the tolerance of patients to long-term therapy. It therefore seems premature to recommend megestrol for patients with AIDS and significant weight loss.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Von Roenn JH, Armstrong D, Kotler DP, Cohn DL, Klimas NG, Tchekmedyian NS, et al. Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS-related cachexia. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:393-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Oster MH, Enders SR, Samuels SJ, Cohn LA, Hooton TM, Browder HP, et al. Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS and cachexia. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:400-8.

3. Shike M, Russel DM, Detsky AS, Harrison JE, McNeill KG, Sheperd FA, et al. Changes in body composition in patients with small-cell lung cancer. The effect of total parenteral nutrition as an adjunct to chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med. 1984; 101:303-9.

4. Kotler DP, Tierney AR, Wand J, Pierson RN Jr. Magnitude of body-cell-mass depletion and the timing of death from wasting in AIDS. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989; 50:444-7.

5. Murray MJ, Murray MB. Starvation suppression and refeeding activation of infection. An ecological necessity? Lancet. 1977; 1:123-5.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Cohen, M. H.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online