Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Garibaldi, R. A.
space
  arrow  Kanya, D. T.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

REPLY

In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine

right arrow Richard A. Garibaldi, MD; Herbert S. Waxman, MD; and D. Theresa Kanya, MBA

1 January 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 1 | Pages 73-74


IN RESPONSE:

In a voluntary examination such as the ITE-IM, selection bias may influence test scores over time. It is possible that "better" programs offered the examination to their interns when the test first became available and that the recent decrease in scores among first-year housestaff who have graduated from medical schools in the United States reflects the fact that the examination is now being administered by a wider array of programs. It should be noted, however, that the decrease in scores is less evident among interns who have graduated from international medical schools. On the 1994 ITE-IM, the downward trend in scores for first-year U.S. medical graduates continued (average score, 55.6); this score was lower than that for first-year international graduates (average score, 55.8) for the first time. In addition, most programs that offer the examination to interns also offer it to third-year housestaff. The decrease in scores over time is less prominent in the third-year comparison group, suggesting that selection bias may not be a major explanation of our observations.

It is not surprising that a high correlation exists between scores for examinations that use a similar format, have a high reliability, and test core knowledge in internal medicine [1]. We have not correlated scores of trainees who took both the ITE-IM and ABIM examination; however, others have done so [2, 3] and have seen the same high association as that noted in two of the previous letters. In addition, we think that the ITE-IM provides better insight into the working knowledge of the resident because most residents do not spend much time preparing for this examination. For this reason, it may be particularly useful in identifying subject areas that need additional emphasis. However, the subtest (or organ-specific) scores for the ITE-IM are not as reliable or accurate as the total test score for subject areas in which relatively few questions are asked. Therefore, subtest results of the ITE-IM should not be used alone to develop curricula for remedial work for an individual resident.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

University of Connecticut Health Center; Farmington, CT 06030-3950
Albert Einstein Medical Center; Philadelphia, PA 19141-3025
American College of Physicians; Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Sosenko J, Stekel KW, Soto R, Gelbard M. NBME examination part I as a predictor of clinical and ABIM certifying examination performance. J Gen Intern Med. 1993; 8:86-8.

2. Grossman RS, Fincher RE, Layne RD, Seelig CB, Berkowitz LR, Levine MA. Validity of the in-training examination for predicting American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination scores. J Gen Intern Med. 1991; 763-7.

3. Waxman H, Braunstein G, Dantzker D. Performance on the internal medicine second-year residency in-training examination predicts the outcome of the ABIM certifying examination. J Gen Intern Med. 1994; (In press).

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Garibaldi, R. A.
space
  arrow  Kanya, D. T.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online