Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Wolfsthal, S. D.
space
  arrow  Hooper, F. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine

right arrow Susan D. Wolfsthal, MD, and Frank J. Hooper, MPH, ScD

1 January 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 1 | Pages 73-74


TO THE EDITOR:

Garibaldi and colleagues [1] discuss the usefulness and reliability of the In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine (ITE-IM). They note how residents and program directors can use scores to evaluate individual and group performances. We found that the ITE-IM has a strong positive predictive value in identifying residents who pass the certifying examination in internal medicine of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM).

Since 1988, all residents have taken the ITE-IM during their second year of residency and, since 1993, during both their second and third years. We analyzed the relation between the residents' performance on the ITE-IM during their second year and their ABIM examination passing status on their first attempt. Data were analyzed using chi-square analysis and the Fisher exact test.

Overall, 104 of 111 residents graduating between 1989 and 1993 completed both the ITE-IM and the ABIM examination. We used the 25th percentile as a cut point to determine the probability of passing the certifying examination.

The sensitivity of predicting whether a resident would pass the ABIM examination was 90% Table 1, and the specificity was 60% (P > 0.001). Of the eight residents who failed the ABIM examination despite an ITE-IM score in the 25th percentile or greater, the mean ITE-IM percentile was 45.6% compared with 60.2% for those who passed the ABIM examination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Relation of the In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine Percentile Score during the Second Year of Training and the Number of Residents Who Pass the ABIM Certifying Examination*

 

An ITE-IM score in the 25th percentile or greater was an absolute predictor of passing the ABIM for third-year residents who took the ITE-IM in 1993. Of these 24 residents, all 18 who scored above this cut point passed the ABIM examination, and all 6 who scored below failed it (P < 0.001).

The use of percentile grades rather than the percentage correct score provides a standardized measurement for comparing residents with their peers and with residents from previous years. The program director can use the ITE-IM to determine a resident's chance of passing the ABIM examination and then structure a learning program targeted to helping residents become certified on their first attempt. Because scores are further divided by subspecialty, residents can focus on specific areas in which their knowledge needs strengthening. These results help to validate the interpretation of the usefulness and reliability of the ITE-IM.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReference

University of Maryland School of Medicine; Baltimore, MD 21201


Reference
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReference

1. Garibaldi RA, Trontell MA, Waxman H, Holbrook JH, Kanya DT, Khoshbin S. The In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:117-23.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. A. Garibaldi, R. Subhiyah, M. E. Moore, and H. Waxman
The In-Training Examination in Internal Medicine: An Analysis of Resident Performance over Time
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Wolfsthal, S. D.
space
  arrow  Hooper, F. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online