Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  White, R. H.
space
  arrow  Twitchell, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Temporary Discontinuation of Warfarin Therapy: Changes in the International Normalized Ratio

right arrow Richard H. White, MD; Tara McKittrick, MS; Rose Hutchinson, MS, FNP; and Jeff Twitchell, MD

1 January 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 1 | Pages 40-42

Objective: To measure the rate of decrease of the international normalized ratio (INR) after temporary discontinuation of warfarin therapy.

Design: Prospective evaluation of an outpatient cohort.

Setting: University medical center anticoagulation clinic.

Patients: 22 patients receiving a fixed evening dose of warfarin for whom temporary discontinuation of therapy was deemed safe.

Measurements: Serial plasma samples were drawn for INR measurements approximately 20, 65, 115, and 185 hours after patients received the last dose of warfarin. In five patients, INR was measured twice daily for 5 days.

Results: For patients with a mean steady-state INR of 2.6, the mean INR 65 hours (2.7 days) after discontinuation of warfarin therapy was 1.6 (range, 1.11 to 2.16); 20 of 22 patients (91%) had an INR greater than 1.2. The mean INR 115 hours (4.7 days) after discontinuation of warfarin therapy was 1.1; 5 of 22 patients (23%) had an INR of 1.2 or greater. In 5 patients studied in detail, the INR decreased exponentially and had a half-life that ranged from 0.52 to 1.2 days; the onset of maximal decrease began 24 to 36 hours after discontinuation of warfarin therapy. In the total cohort, age was a significant (P < 0.005) independent predictor of smaller decreases in the INR between day 1 and day 3 (regression coefficient = –6.8%±2%/2 days per decade of age; R2 = 0.34).

Conclusions: By simulating preoperative discontinuation of warfarin therapy, we found that the INR decreases exponentially, with wide interpatient variation in the rate of decrease. Age is associated with a slower rate of decrease. To be certain that the INR at the time of the surgery is less than 1.2, warfarin should be withheld for 96 to 115 hours (4 doses) in patients with a steady-state INR between 2.0 and 3.0. For patients with a higher steady-state INR, a longer wait is necessary.


Long-term warfarin therapy must frequently be discontinued before surgical and dental procedures. Although evidence shows that minor procedures such as dental surgery [1, 2] and even cataract surgery [3, 4] can be done safely without discontinuation of therapy, most procedures require that warfarin be temporarily withdrawn to reduce the likelihood of excessive bleeding. However, because of the risk for a thrombotic complication, warfarin therapy must be discontinued for as brief a time as possible [5].

Unfortunately, few data are available to help clinicians identify the appropriate time interval between the discontinuation of warfarin therapy and a surgical procedure. Most published recommendations are not referenced and appear to be based primarily on personal experience [5-7]. The primary objective of our study was to measure the decrease in the international normalized ratio (INR) over time after discontinuation of warfarin therapy.


Methods
space
up arrowTop
dotMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Patients

Our study was approved by the committee for research involving humans at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine. The risk for thrombosis during several days without anticoagulant therapy was judged to be acceptably low for patients with 1) deep venous thrombosis after 12 weeks of treatment; 2) atrial fibrillation with no valvular heart disease, stroke, or systemic embolization; and 3) congestive cardiomyopathy without heart failure, previous stroke, or systemic embolization. Patients with a history of widely fluctuating warfarin requirements and those with a complex dosing regimen that precluded simplification were excluded.

Protocol

Patients received a fixed daily dose of warfarin at 5:00 p.m. For example, a patient who had been receiving 5 mg/d 3 times weekly and 7 mg/d 4 times weekly at 8:00 am (43 mg/wk) received 6 mg/d each evening (42 mg/wk). After at least 1 week of this regimen, each patient was seen midday on a Monday (day 1), and his or her INR was measured. Patients were then instructed to discontinue warfarin therapy and to return 48 hours (day 3), 96 hours (day 5), and 168 hours (day 8) later for repeated INR measurements.

Five patients whose INR had a wide range in the rate of decrease were restudied at least 1 month after restarting daily warfarin therapy. These patients had INR measurements at 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. for 5 consecutive days after discontinuation of warfarin therapy.

Measurements

Laboratory INR measurements were done on an automated photo-optical coagulometer (MLA-700, Medical Laboratory Automation, Inc., Mount Vernon, New York). The thromboplastin used for all but the first 8 patients studied was a recombinant human tissue factor (Innovin, Baxter Diagnostics, Deerfield, Illinois) with an international sensitivity index of 0.92 (lot TFS 12). Thromboplastin C (Baxter Diagnostics), which has an international sensitivity index of 2.98 (lot 627), was used for the first 8 patients.

Calculations and Statistics

The half-life of the INR was calculated after transforming INR values to the natural logarithm of (INR –1) and measuring the slope of the linear regression versus time in hours after discontinuation of warfarin therapy. The quantity (INR –1) was used because the minimum value for INR is 1.0. Because the INR did not decrease until after the second measurement on day 1, the first INR measurement on day 1 was excluded. The theoretical time at which the INR began to decrease from the steady-state level was calculated by using data from day 2 to day 5 and by extrapolating the linear regression equation back to the steady-state level equal to the INR in the afternoon of day 1. Means are expressed ±SD.

Relations between various clinical variables and the percentage decrease in the INR between day 1 and day 3 were evaluated using stepwise multiple linear regression [8]. The percentage decrease in the INR between day 1 and day 3 was the dependent variable; variables analyzed were age, weight, height, sex, dose of warfarin, initial INR, and time between the day 1 INR and the day 3 INR. Regression analysis was done using a software program (Solo, BMDP statistical software, Los Angeles, California) on a personal computer.


Results
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
dotResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Thirty-two of 44 potential candidates agreed to participate in the study; 22 completed the protocol. Twelve were men and 10 were women; their average age was 55 years (range, 25 to 81 years); their mean weight was 85.5 kg; and their mean height was 172 cm. Nine had atrial fibrillation, 10 had venous thromboembolism, and 3 had cardiomyopathy; their mean warfarin dose was 5.7 mg/d (range, 1.5 to 11.0 mg/d). Their mean initial INR was 2.6; all INRs were between 2.0 and 3.0 except for one that was 1.95 and one that was 3.8. Figure 1 shows INR values as a function of time after the last dose of warfarin. On day 3, a mean of 66.5 ±2 hours after the last dose of warfarin, 10 of 22 patients (55%) had an INR greater than 1.5, whereas only 2 of 22 (9%) had an INR less than 1.2. On day 5, an average of 115 ±7 hours after discontinuation of warfarin therapy, all but 5 patients had an INR less than 1.2, and on day 8, with the exception of two INRs that were 1.2 and 1.23, all INRs were less than 1.2. Using linear regression analysis, we found that the only covariate showing a significant (P = 0.005) independent association with the percentage decrease in the INR between day 1 and day 3 was age (regression coefficient = –6.8%±2%/2 days per decade of age; R2 = 0.34).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Decrease in the international normalized ratio (INR) over time after discontinuation of warfarin therapy. The measured INR is depicted as a function of time after the last dose of warfarin.

 
Results in five patients who were studied in greater detail are shown in Table 1. Using the logarithmic transformation, linear regression of twice-daily INR measurements yielded correlation coefficients (r) of 0.93 to 0.99, suggesting a simple exponential decrease in the INR. The mean INR half-life was 0.9 ±0.2 days, and the mean time between the last dose of warfarin and the time that the INR began to decrease exponentially was 29 ±5 hours.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Decrease in the International Normalized Ratio in Five patients

 

Discussion
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
dotDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Management of long-term warfarin therapy before and after elective surgical procedures raises several important questions. First, is the risk for bleeding so low that warfarin therapy can simply be continued? Second, what is the risk for a thrombotic complication if warfarin therapy is discontinued and the INR returns to normal? Third, what preoperative INR value is associated with a low risk for excessive operative bleeding? Fourth, how should warfarin dosing be managed, assuming that partial or complete reversal of anticoagulation is desired? Our study addressed only this last question.

No previous study has analyzed the decrease in the INR or prothrombin time over time after discontinuation of long-term warfarin therapy in either normal persons or patients at risk for thromboembolism in whom warfarin therapy is discontinued before noncardiac surgery [9-12]. Review articles that discuss the perioperative management of patients receiving warfarin therapy make recommendations based only on clinical experience [5-7].

Our findings indicate that the INR decreases exponentially beginning 24 to 36 hours after the last dose of warfarin. In the 5 patients studied in detail, the half-life of the INR varied considerably, ranging from approximately 0.5 to 1.2 days (12 to 29 hours). Interpatient variation in both the time until exponential decrease begins and the actual rate of decrease are likely contributors to the wide range of INR values (1.1 to 2.16) that we noted in our total cohort approximately 65 hours after the last dose of warfarin.

By analyzing the percentage change in the INR from the steady-state (day 1) value to the day 3 value, which was taken 65 hours after discontinuation of warfarin therapy, we found that age was the only clinical variable significantly associated with percentage decrease. For each 10-year increase in age, the fall in the INR decreased by approximately 7%. This is not surprising; it is known that older persons eliminate warfarin more slowly than do younger persons [13].

Our study did not address the following question: What preoperative INR value is associated with a low incidence of major bleeding complications? Tinker and Tarhan [11] report that almost all major hemorrhages during or after major noncardiac surgery occurred in patients with excessively high prothrombin times, which, assuming that a typical thromboplastin was used, corresponds to an INR greater than 1.46. Assuming that an INR of less than 1.5 is associated with an acceptable risk for perioperative bleeding, our data suggest that almost all patients with an initial INR between 2.0 and 3.0 will have an INR less than 1.5 115 hours (about 4.8 days) after discontinuation of warfarin therapy. Delaying surgery for this length of time is particularly prudent in older patients who eliminate warfarin more slowly and in patients at high risk for a bleeding complication. In patients who must continue to receive anticoagulation therapy except during surgery, administration of a small quantity of vitamin K followed by intravenous heparin may be necessary [5, 10]. Finally, unless the risk for bleeding is negligible, the INR should always be measured before proceeding with surgery.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

From the University of California, Davis, California.
Requests for Reprints: Richard H. White, MD, Room 3107 PCC, 2221 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Stephen McCurdy for his careful and thorough review of the manuscript.


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. McIntyre H. Management, during dental surgery, of patients on anticoagulants. Lancet. 1966; 2:99-100.

2. Ramstrom G, Sindet-Pedersen S, Hall G, Blomback M, Alander U. Prevention of postsurgical bleeding in oral surgery using tranexamic acid without dose modification of oral anticoagulants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51:1211-6.

3. Moll AC, van Rij G, van der Loos TL. Anticoagulant therapy and cataract surgery. Doc Opthalmol. 1989; 72:367-73.

4. Gainey SP, Robertson DM, Fay W, Ilstrup D. Ocular surgery on patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 108:142-6.

5. Cade JF, Hunt D, Stubbs KP, Gallus AS. Guidelines for the management of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing surgery. Med J Aust. 1979; 2:292-4.

6. Travis S, Wray R, Harrison K. Perioperative anticoagulant control. Br J Surg. 1989; 76:1107-8.

7. Rose SD. Cardiac risk factors in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In: Bolt RJ, ed. Medical Evaluation of the Surgical Patient. New York: Futura Press; 1987:253-80.

8. Selvin S. Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.

9. O'Reilly RA, Aggeler PM, Leong LS. Studies on the coumarin anticoagulant drugs: The pharmacodynamics of warfarin in man. J Clin Invest. 1963; 42:1542-51.

10. O'Reilly RA. Anticoagulant, antithrombotic, and thrombolytic drugs. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F, eds. Principles of Pharmacologic Therapeutics. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan; 1987:1344-52.

11. Tinker JH, Tarhan S. Discontinuing anticoagulant therapy in surgical patients with cardiac valve protheses. Observations in 180 operations. JAMA. 1978; 239:738-9.

12. Katholi RE, Nolan SP, McGuire LB. The management of anticoagulation during noncardiac operations in patients with prosthetic heart valves. A prospective study. Am Heart J. 1978; 96:163-5.

13. Mungall DR, Ludden TM, Marshall J, Hawkins DW, Talbert RL, Crawford MH. Population pharmacokinetics of racemic warfarin in adult patients. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985; 13:213-27.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. D. Douketis, P. B. Berger, A. S. Dunn, A. K. Jaffer, A. C. Spyropoulos, R. C. Becker, and J. Ansell
The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 299S - 339S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. E. Ickx and A. Steib
Perioperative management of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: [Prise en charge perioperatoire des patients traites aux antagonistes de la vitamine K]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6_suppl): S113 - S122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J P Hanley
Warfarin reversal
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2004; 57(11): 1132 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
M. A. Smythe, W. E. Dager, and N. M. Patel
Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2004; 17(5): 327 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.J. Kovacs, C. Kearon, M. Rodger, D.R. Anderson, A.G.G. Turpie, S.M. Bates, L. Desjardins, J. Douketis, S.R. Kahn, S. Solymoss, et al.
Single-Arm Study of Bridging Therapy With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Patients at Risk of Arterial Embolism Who Require Temporary Interruption of Warfarin
Circulation, September 21, 2004; 110(12): 1658 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Bombeli and D. R. Spahn
Updates in perioperative coagulation: physiology and management of thromboembolism and haemorrhage
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2004; 93(2): 275 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
D. L. WALLACE, M. D. LATIMER, and H. J. C. R. BELCHER
Stopping Warfarin Therapy is Unnecessary for Hand Surgery
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., June 1, 2004; 29(3): 201 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Lubetsky, H. Yonath, D. Olchovsky, R. Loebstein, H. Halkin, and D. Ezra
Comparison of Oral vs Intravenous Phytonadione (Vitamin K1) in Patients With Excessive Anticoagulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2003; 163(20): 2469 - 2473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A Manhire, M Charig, C Clelland, F Gleeson, R Miller, H Moss, K Pointon, C Richardson, and E Sawicka
Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy
Thorax, November 1, 2003; 58(11): 920 - 936.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Hirsh, V. Fuster, J. Ansell, and J. L. Halperin
American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1633 - 1652.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Hirsh, V. Fuster, J. Ansell, and J. L. Halperin
American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation Guide to Warfarin Therapy
Circulation, April 1, 2003; 107(12): 1692 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
A. I. Schafer, M. N. Levine, B. A. Konkle, and C. Kearon
Thrombotic Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment
Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 520 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. M. Hylek, S. Regan, A. S. Go, R. A. Hughes, D. E. Singer, and S. J. Skates
Clinical Predictors of Prolonged Delay in Return of the International Normalized Ratio to within the Therapeutic Range after Excessive Anticoagulation with Warfarin
Ann Intern Med, September 18, 2001; 135(6): 393 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
J. A. Ginsberg, M. A. Crowther, R. H. White, and T. L. Ortel
Anticoagulation Therapy
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 339 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Ansell, J. Hirsh, J. Dalen, H. Bussey, D. Anderson, L. Poller, A. Jacobson, D. Deykin, and D. Matchar
Managing Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 22S - 38S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C. Gohlke-Bärwolf
VALVE DISEASE: Anticoagulation in valvar heart disease: new aspects and management during non-cardiac surgery
Heart, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 567 - 572.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. M. Hylek, Y. Chang, S. J. Skates, R. A. Hughes, and D. E. Singer
Prospective Study of the Outcomes of Ambulatory Patients With Excessive Warfarin Anticoagulation
Arch Intern Med, June 12, 2000; 160(11): 1612 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Drugs in the peri-operative period: 4 - Cardiovascular drugs
DTB, December 1, 1999; 37(12): 89 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
D. Potyk and P. Raudaskoski
Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation for Elective Noncardiac Surgery
Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1998; 7(2): 164 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Kearon and J. Hirsh
Management of Anticoagulation before and after Elective Surgery
N. Engl. J. Med., May 22, 1997; 336(21): 1506 - 1511.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Hirsh and J. Hoak
Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Council on Thrombosis (in Consultation With the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association
Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2212 - 2245.
[Full Text]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  White, R. H.
space
  arrow  Twitchell, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online