Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Judson, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Clinical Judgment

right arrow Mark A. Judson, MD

15 October 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 8 | Page 624


TO THE EDITOR:

In his recent article [1], Dr. Feinstein eloquently outlined a subtle but real problem: Physicians are moving away from the patient by proposing that medical problems can be solved by quantitative models rather than by clinical judgment. This attitude has recently been fueled by the national health care debate, which has focused on cost and outcome but not on the welfare of individual patients.

Despite the significant limitations of applying quantitative decision analysis to patient management, I have recently noticed the development of a form of mathematical terrorism: Clinical judgment, even if based on years of experience, knowledge of relevant studies in the medical literature, and the opinions of world experts (usually based on data from more patients with a similar problem than any of us will ever encounter), is rebuked in deference to construction of a quantitative decision analysis.

When faced with a patient who has complex medical problems, I sincerely doubt that results from a quantitative decision analysis will affect my practice. I will continue to use my "clinical judgment," which is not a dirty word.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Feinstein AR. Clinical Judgment revisited: the distraction of quantitative models. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:799-805.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Judson, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online