Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Finucane, T. E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Ethics Committees, Due Process, and Compassion

right arrow Thomas E. Finucane, MD

1 September 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 5 | Pages 386-387


TO THE EDITOR:

Both articles about ethics committees refer to the lack of due process when complex and often tragic decisions about care are made [1, 2]. In the nursing home, we frequently have ill, suffering patients with marginal ability to make decisions about burdensome treatments that might prolong life. How do we decide? The people who care for the patients and those who love them put their heads together and try to determine what is right.

At one extreme, sick persons or their families could retain the services of a lawyer to ensure that all patients' rights were fully protected. At the other extreme, physicians could care for patients as they see fit, with licensure and malpractice as sanctions. Ethics committees lie somewhere in the middle. They are a good idea, but moving them toward the legal end of the spectrum will not improve patient care.

The adversarial model, in which everyone asserts their rights, is a little incongruous when people are ill, suffering, and near death. For some patients, compassion is a more important consideration than autonomy, survival, or even procedural due process.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Fleetwood J, Unger SS. Institutional ethics committees and the shield of immunity. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:320-5.

2. Fletcher JC, Hoffman DE. Ethics committees: time to experiment with standards. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:335-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Finucane, T. E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online