Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Linzer, M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

Blueberry Muffins and Mystery Novels

right arrow Mark Linzer, MD

15 December 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 12 | Pages 986-987


IN RESPONSE:

If only we all had the opportunity to establish long-lasting and meaningful relationships with patients on a daily basis! Certainly, few patients today would say that their physicians connect with them, explain things clearly, and take the time to get to know them. As Co-Chair of the Society of General Internal Medicine's Task Force on Career Choice, I have spent years asking medical students why they are no longer interested in careers in internal medicine [1, 2]. The reason given most often is an inability to establish meaningful relationships with patients during medical training. The students ask us to increase outpatient exposure to correct this problem.

Thus, Dr. Burns' perception may depend on location. The outpatient-based physician will usually connect with his or her patients over the years. However, I remember when I was a medical house officer and would work all night to restore a desperately ill patient to health. In the morning, the private physician would walk in and the patient would glow at his doctor and say how happy he was to see him. I would feel left out of that "connexional" [3] energy.

The in-hospital training environment is toxic to good relationships. Patients enter desperately ill and leave after a diagnostic-related group-determined, foreshortened length of stay, long before a house officer, student, or attending physician can establish a relationship with them. Being the "attending of the month" on the wards (as I was with Mrs. Tyler) leaves one particularly vulnerable to this situation. To recapture students' (and perhaps our own) interest in internal medicine, we will need to either alter this environment or put students in physicians' offices, where they can see patients in a longitudinal manner and establish the relationships craved by those of us who chose internal medicine [4].

I agree that it was "unfortunate" for my student that this should have been one of his most "powerful experiences during medical school." But it was, and we must not let that remain the case. Courses such as the one run by Dr. Mack Lipkin at New York University (eloquently described in Anna Quindlen's recent New York Times article [5]) will help many of us learn how to restore medicine to the personally connected profession described by Dr. Burns. Because many physicians fear that health reform, with its emphasis on managed care and "business-like medicine," will further endanger the doctor-patient relationship, we must insist that this relationship be the core of medical practice and that sufficient time in the office and at the bedside must be allowed for it to flourish.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead E, and the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Interest Group on Career Choice in Internal Medicine. Medical student interest in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114:6-15.

2. McMurray JE, Schwartz MD, Genero NP, Linzer M, for the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Career Choice in Internal Medicine. The attractiveness of internal medicine: a qualitative analysis of the experiences of female and male medical students. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:812-8.

3. Matthews DA, Suchman AL, Branch WT Jr. Making "connexions": enhancing the therapeutic potential of patient-clinician relationships. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118:973-7.

4. Lewis CE, Prout DM, Chalmers EP, Leake B. How satisfying is the practice of internal medicine? Ann Intern Med. 1994; 114:1-5.

5. Quindlen A. The human touch. New York Times. 14 May 1994.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Linzer, M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online