Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Irwig, L.
space
  arrow  Gatsonis, C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests

right arrow Les Irwig; Anna N. A. Tosteson; and Constantine Gatsonis

15 November 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 10 | Pages 817-818


IN RESPONSE:

We thank Dr. Wolf for his comments. Our aim in using the judgments of the three independent raters was to accept the majority view rather than to reach consensus among disparate views by discussion. Some meta-analysts prefer discussion because discrepancies are often caused by a rater missing a critical bit of information rather than by a difference in judgment.

In principle, we agree that measures of inter-rater agreement would be of interest. In our article, based on only 11 studies, we did not calculate {kappa} statistics because they would have had uninterpretably wide confidence intervals.

We agree that a summary table of primary studies by criteria is useful in a meta-analysis addressing a particular question. The meta-analyses we reviewed addressed many questions. Because different meta-analyses were good examples of different guidelines, we decided to refer to particular examples in the Review section of our article when appropriate rather than to list the cross-classification of studies by criteria.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Irwig, L.
space
  arrow  Gatsonis, C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online