Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
15 April 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 8 | Pages 653-662
Objective: To assess three anti-stress ulcer prophylaxis regimens in mechanically ventilated patients for bacterial colonization, early- and late-onset nosocomial pneumonia, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Patients: Consecutive eligible patients with mechanical ventilation and a nasogastric tube. Of 258 eligible patients, 244 were assessable.
Setting: Medical and surgical intensive care units.
Intervention: At intubation, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following: antacid (a suspension of aluminum hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide), 20 mL every 2 hours; ranitidine, 150 mg as a continuous intravenous infusion; or sucralfate, 1 g every 4 hours.
Measurements: Using predetermined criteria, the incidence of gastric bleeding, gastric colonization, early-onset pneumonia, and late-onset pneumonia was assessed in patients intubated for more than 24 hours.
Results: Of 244 assessable patients, macroscopic gastric bleeding was observed in 10%, 4%, and 6% of patients assigned to receive sucralfate, antacid, and ranitidine, respectively (P > 0.2). The incidence of early-onset pneumonia was not statistically different among the three treatment groups (P > 0.2). Among the 213 patients observed for more than 4 days, late-onset pneumonia was observed in 5% of the patients who received sucralfate compared with 16% and 21% of the patients who received antacid or ranitidine, respectively (P = 0.022). Mortality was not statistically different among the three treatment groups. Patients who received sucralfate had a lower median gastric pH (P < 0.001) and less frequent gastric colonization compared with the other groups (P = 0.015). Using molecular typing, 84% of the patients with late-onset gram-negative bacillary pneumonia were found to have gastric colonization with the same bacteria before pneumonia developed.
Conclusion: Stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate reduces the risk for late-onset pneumonia in ventilated patients compared with antacid or ranitidine.
Over the last few years, studies have shown that agents that raise the gastric pH may promote proliferation of bacteria in the stomach, particularly gram-negative bacilli that may originate in the duodenum [6-10]. Passive esophageal reflux and microaspiration of the gastric content along the endotracheal tube may lead to the colonization of the trachea and then to pneumonia [6, 7, 10-18]. Thus, concerns have arisen that the risk for nosocomial pneumonia may outweigh the benefit of stress ulcer prophylaxis when agents raising the gastric pH are used.
Sucralfate is a complex salt of sucrose sulfate and aluminum hydroxide that appears to be as effective as antacids or histamine-2 (H2) antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis [2, 19, 20] but by mechanisms of action that do not result in clinically relevant gastric pH modification. Several studies have documented that gastric colonization is less frequent and of a lesser magnitude in ventilated patients treated with this agent compared with antacids or H2-antagonists [8, 21-23]. However, whether this would result in a decreased risk for nosocomial pneumonia is controversial [18, 24] because a reduction was found in some [21-23, 25] but not all [17, 21-23, 25-29] comparative studies. Methodologic differences among these studies might explain these conflicting findings [18]. For example, small numbers of patients for analysis [17, 26], low risk for pneumonia in the study patients [27, 28], periods of observation that were too brief [28], insufficient dosages of the agents that raise pH [27, 29], and wide use of enteral feeding [17] might account for the absence of reduction in the incidence of pneumonia noted in some studies. On the other hand, differences in the distribution of the base-line characteristics among the patients [22, 23], the grouping of patients receiving antacids and H2-antagonists, and analysis of subgroups of patients not randomly assigned to a treatment group [21, 25] may have biased the studies in which sucralfate was associated with lower rates of pneumonia. In addition, in two of these latter studies, the reduction of pneumonia developing in patients treated with sucralfate compared with other treatment did not reach the usual 0.05 level of significance [21, 23].
Furthermore, previous studies did not distinguish between pneumonia occurring early or late after intubation. This may be important because it is likely that early-onset pneumonia may be related to the introduction of bacteria in the trachea at the time of intubation [30-32], a process that is not expected to be influenced by the type of anti-stress ulcer prophylaxis.
Therefore, we compared three anti-stress ulcer prophylaxis regimens (antacid, ranitidine, and sucralfate) in a large group of ventilated patients for the occurrence of bacterial colonization, early and late-onset nosocomial pneumonia, and overt gastrointestinal bleeding.
The Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois is a 1100-bed hospital serving both as a municipal facility and a tertiary referral center. During a 2-year period (January 1989 to January 1991), all patients admitted to the adult medical and surgical intensive care units who were receiving mechanical ventilation and had a nasogastric tube in place were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: active upper gastrointestinal bleeding; treatment with antacids, H2-blockers, or sucralfate during the preceding 48 hours; creatinine levels greater than 200 µmol/L; esogastric surgery; cardiac surgery; or organ transplantations. Patients likely to be extubated within 24 hours were also excluded.
At intubation, patients were stratified into five categories according to the following underlying conditions: trauma (surgical intensive care unit), intervention after surgery (surgical intensive care unit), cardiac disease (medical intensive care unit), pulmonary disease (medical intensive care unit), and other medical conditions [medical intensive care unit]. Randomization was done using a random permutable table to generate a random treatment list. Treatment regimens were included in opaque, sealed envelopes. The patients were assigned to one of the following anti-stress ulcer prophylactic regimens: 1) antacid, a hospital-made suspension containing 5.4% aluminum hydroxide and 1.5% magnesium hydroxide with a buffer capacity of 1.2 mEq/mL, administered every 2 hoursthe standard dose of 20 mL was doubled if the gastric pH (tested with pH-indicator strips [Merck and Co., Darmstadt, Germany] before each administration) was less than 4.0; 2) ranitidine (Zantac, Glaxo, Bern, Switzerland) administered as a continuous intravenous infusion of 150 mg/d [100 mg/d if the blood creatinine level was between 150 and 200 µmol/L]; or 3) sucralfate (Ulcogant, Merck and Co., Zurich, Switzerland) administered every 4 hours as 1 gram of suspension diluted in 20 mL of sterile water.
After antacid or sucralfate was administered, the nasogastric tube was flushed with 10 mL of sterile water and clamped for 30 minutes.
Each prophylactic regimen was continued until extubation unless interrupted earlier for any of the following predetermined reasons: an increase of the blood creatinine level to more than 200 µmol/L, removal of the nasogastric tube, moribund state, discharge from the intensive care units, or side effects likely to be related to the stress ulcer regimen.
Gastric aspirates were examined for the macroscopic presence of blood ("coffee ground material" or fresh blood). The severity of gastric hemorrhage was assessed by clinical criteria (physical signs, blood transfusion requirements, and outcome). Chest radiographs were obtained on a daily basis or more often if clinically indicated. They were interpreted by a pneumologist who had knowledge of all relevant data except for the patient's stress ulcer prophylactic regimen, gastric pH, or colonization data.
Criteria for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia were predetermined and derived from those of Salata and colleagues [35]: presence of a new or progressive infiltrate on the chest radiograph consistent with pneumonia, without other obvious cause, and associated with conditions A or B or both, defined as follows. Condition A refers to any of the following findings: pleural fluid or blood culture positive for an organism also isolated in the tracheal aspirate, radiographic cavitation, or histopathologic evidence of pneumonia. Condition B includes at least two of the following: tracheal aspirates with more than 25 leukocytes per low-power field (x 100) on a Gram stain, new leukocytosis defined as a leukocyte count greater than 10 x 109/L with an increase of at least 25% over baseline, or body temperature greater than 38.5 °C with an increase of at least 1 °C above baseline. The latter two criteria were considered only when other causes for these findings were excluded.
Pneumonia was considered to be caused by a pathogen when it was cultured in high counts as the sole or predominant microorganism in the tracheal aspirate culture.
Using the criteria of Langer and colleagues [30], early-onset and late-onset pneumonia were diagnosed if they occurred during the first 4 days of or 4 days after the initiation of mechanical ventilation, respectively. Consequently, only patients observed for more than 4 days could be evaluated for the development of late-onset pneumonia. A second episode of pneumonia was diagnosed when it was clearly temporally distinct from the first episode and when it involved other areas of the lungs.
Pneumonia was attributed to a given anti-stress ulcer prophylactic regimen if it developed during treatment or within 2 days after extubation or treatment interruption.
Death was considered to be directly related to nosocomial pneumonia when it occurred during the episode and when no other major contributing cause was present.
Colonization was defined by the presence of one microorganism at a given site on at least two occasions. A patient was considered to have gastric colonization with high counts when quantitative culture of at least one specimen was more than 105 CFU/mL [11]. The amount of bacteria in the oropharynx and trachea was assessed semi-quantitatively using the four-quadrants streak-plate method and was considered high when bacteria were present up to the third or fourth quadrant.
The pattern of colonization was examined by comparing bacterial strains of the same species isolated from two or more sites. For this purpose, strains were kept at 20°C when isolated for the first time at a given site. Strains of the same species were considered identical when the biotype and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns were identical. In addition, ribosomal RNA gene restriction fragment length analysis (ribotyping) was done for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains when bacteria were isolated from the stomach, trachea, and throat of one patient [36]. EcoRI, BamHI, PsI, SphI or SmaI restriction enzymes were used to digest the DNA of P. aeruginosa, whereas BamHI, EcoRI, PsI or HindIII were used with E. coli DNA. Appropriate controls showed that the method accurately discriminated between strains of different origin [37]. A retrograde colonization from the stomach to the trachea was assumed when a particular organism was first isolated from the stomach (and not from the throat) and subsequently recovered in the trachea. ARTICLE
Nosocomial Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Receiving Antacid, Ranitidine, or Sucralfate as Prophylaxis for Stress Ulcer
A Randomized Controlled Trial
Intensive care patients are at risk for bleeding from stress ulcers of the upper gastrointestinal tract [1]. Despite the decline of this complication over the last two decades [2], certain patients, such as those requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, remain at high risk and may benefit from stress ulcer prophylaxis [1, 3-5].
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Statistical Analysis
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Patients
Data Collection and Definitions
![]()
For all eligible patients, demographic characteristics, diagnosis, underlying diseases, physical signs, laboratory tests, and medications were recorded prospectively by one of the investigators. However, only patients eventually intubated for more than 24 hours were followed and included in the final analysis. Glasgow coma and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring systems were used to assess the severity of the acute illness [33]. The adult respiratory distress syndrome was defined by the following criteria: acute bilateral diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and severe hypoxemia without evidence of cardiogenic edema [34].
Bacteriologic Investigations and pH Measurements
![]()
Gastric and tracheal aspirates and oropharyngeal swabs were obtained twice daily and cultured quantitatively (gastric juice) or semi-quantitatively in aerobic conditions. Aerobic bacteria were identified by standard microbiologic methods. Cultures for Chlamydia species, Legionella pneumophila, or Mycoplasma pneumoniae were not done. Blood or pleural fluid cultures were ordered by the primary care physician according to the clinical situation. Gastric pH was measured twice a day using a pH meter (except in 11 patients for whom values were derived only from pH-indicator strips [Merck and Co.]). A cut-off value of 4.0 for median pH was chosen for further analysis within the three treatment groups because it has been shown to be a critical value for the growth of gram-negative bacilli in the stomach [6, 7, 25].
Statistical Analysis
![]()
Top
Methods
Statistical Analysis
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Categorical variables were analyzed by the chi-square test for association. Continuous variables were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance or the nonparametric Kruskall Wallis test. The effect of continuous variables on a categorical variable was tested using logistic regression analysis.
Results
![]()
Top
Methods
Statistical Analysis
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
During the study period, 758 patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit and 2408 patients were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. Of 450 eligible patients during the study period, 375 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and 258 were eventually intubated for more than 24 hours. Fourteen were unassessable because of missing data (4, 3, and 7 patients in the antacid, ranitidine, and sucralfate groups, respectively). Thus, 244 patients could be analyzed. Of these 244 patients, 81 received antacid, 80 received ranitidine, and 83 received sucralfate. At randomization, no statistically significant difference was found among the three groups in terms of age (P = 0.058), sex (P > 0.2), APACHE II scores (P > 0.2), Glasgow coma scores (P > 0.2), and other underlying characteristics (Table 1). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found among the three groups in the number of days at risk with intubation (P > 0.2), the number of days at risk with tracheostomy (P > 0.2), or the number of days at risk with endotracheal tube (P > 0.2), and in the number of patients receiving enteral nutrition (P > 0.2) (Table 1).
|
The protocol had to be interrupted before extubation in 23 (28%) of the patients in the antacid group, 19 (24%) of the patients in the ranitidine group, and 17 (20%) in the sucralfate group. Renal insufficiency developed in 5, 8, and 6 patients in the antacid, ranitidine, and sucralfate groups, respectively. In the antacid group, 6 patients developed diarrhea or ileus, which was attributed to the treatment. In the ranitidine group, one patient developed leukopenia and another patient developed a rash. Removal of the nasogastric tube, withdrawal of supportive care, or discharge from the hospital was the other reason for premature protocol interruption. Five patients in the antacid group, 5 patients in the ranitidine group, and 8 patients in the sucralfate group had these characteristics. In addition, protocol violation prompted interruption of treatment in 7 patients in the antacid group, 4 patients in the ranitidine group, and 3 patients in the sucralfate group.
For patients in whom the protocol was interrupted, the total number of assessable days before interruption was not statistically different among the three groups (P > 0.2).
Macroscopic Gastrointestinal Bleeding
|
|---|
Blood transfusions were required in one patient treated with ranitidine and in one patient treated with sucralfate. One patient treated with sucralfate died as a direct result of the bleeding.
Gastric pH
|
|---|
Median gastric pH values of patients treated by sucralfate were lower than those in patients treated with antacid or ranitidine (P < 0.001) (Figure 1). The medians of these values were 7.10, 6.27, and 4.30 for the patients receiving antacid, ranitidine, and sucralfate, respectively.
|
Bacterial Colonization
|
|---|
Of the 46 patients with a median pH lower than 4.0, 13 (28%) had gastric colonization with gram-negative bacilli compared with 86 (48%) of the 178 patients with a pH greater than 4.0 (P = 0.023). If colonization with high counts is considered, 3 of 46 patients with a median pH lower than 4.0 had gastric colonization compared with 63 of 178 patients with a pH greater than 4.0 (P = 0.001). Tracheal colonization with high counts was also lower in patients who had a gastric pH lower than 4.0 (7 of 46 patients) than in patients with a gastric pH greater than 4.0 (55 of 178 patients) (P = 0.053).
Gastric colonization in each treatment group was associated with a higher pH. In the patients with a gastric pH lower than 4.0, no apparent difference was found in the gastric colonization rates among the treatment groups, but only a few of these patients were in the antacid or ranitidine groups (Table 2). In the patients with a gastric pH greater than 4.0, 37 of 73 patients in the antacid group and 36 of 65 patients in the ranitidine group had gastric colonization, compared with 13 of 40 patients in the sucralfate group (P = 0.065). When patients with low and high gastric pH values were pooled in each treatment group, the proportion of patients who had gastric colonization with gram-negative bacilli and gastric colonization with a gram-negative bacilli concentration greater than 105 CFU/mL was lower in the sucralfate group (13 of 75 patients) than in the antacid group (26 of 76 patients) and the ranitidine group (27 of 73 patients) (P = 0.017) (Table 2).
|
The proportion of patients with tracheal colonization was not different in the antacid (24 of 76 patients) and sucralfate groups (22 of 75 patients) but was lower than in the ranitidine group (36 of 73 patients) (P = 0.022) (Table 3). The proportion of patients with oropharyngeal colonization was lower in the sucralfate group than in the other two groups (P = 0.19) (Table 3).
|
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
|
|---|
Early-onset pneumonia developed in 9 of 81 (11%) patients in the antacid group, 8 of 80 (10%) patients in the ranitidine group, and 7 of 83 (8%) patients in the sucralfate group (P > 0.2). Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae, alone or in combination, accounted for 54% of the cases of early-onset pneumonia, whereas gram-negative bacilli were present in only 17% of these episodes (Table 4).
|
Thirty-one patients were extubated (5 in the antacid group, 4 in the ranitidine group, and 3 in the sucralfate group) or died (7 in the antacid group, 8 in the ranitidine group, and 4 in the sucralfate group) before 4 days of observation and could not be analyzed for the development of late-onset pneumonia. No statistical difference in underlying characteristics of these patients was found among the treatment groups. Of the 213 patients observed for more than 4 days, late-onset pneumonia was diagnosed in 11 of 69 (16%) patients in the antacid group, 14 of 68 (21%) patients in the ranitidine group, and 4 of 76 (5%) patients in the sucralfate group (P = 0.022). Three of the four cases of late-onset pneumonia observed in the sucralfate group were diagnosed on day 5, whereas pneumonia continued to be observed during the following days in the other two groups (Figure 2).
|
Although no statistically significant difference in the median age of the patients was found among the groups, patients on ranitidine were approximately 12% older than the patients receiving antacid or sucralfate. A logistic regression analysis using age and treatment as predictors showed that late-onset pneumonia was not related to age (P = 0.149).
All but one patient with late-onset pneumonia caused by gram-negative bacilli had a median gastric pH greater than 4.0 before the episode. When analyzing only patients with a gastric pH greater than 4.0, the incidence of late-onset pneumonia was not statistically different among the treatment groups (P = 0.089).
Gram-negative bacilli were shown in 19 of 29 (66%) episodes of late-onset pneumonia (see Table 4). Of the 19 patients with late-onset gram-negative bacillary pneumonia, 84% (16 patients) had gastric colonization with bacteria of the same species before pneumonia developed, including the three patients of the sucralfate group who had a gastric pH greater than 4.0. In contrast, the overall gastric colonization rate with gram-negative bacilli was only 50% in the 182 patients who were followed for more than 4 days and did not have gram-negative pneumonia (P = 0.009). Moreover, 53% of the 19 patients with gram-negative pneumonia had gastric colonization with counts higher than 105 cfu/mL before the episode, compared with 24% of the 182 patients without gram-negative pneumonia (P = 0.017).
Of the 16 patients with gram-negative pneumonia and previous gastric colonization, the bacteria isolated from the stomach and trachea in 14 patients had the same biotype and antibiotic susceptibility pattern and the same ribotype (done in 10 patients). In one case, the strains differed by only 1 of 46 bands on ribotyping. In the last case, the two isolates differed only by the susceptibility to the antibiotic the patient was receiving. The tracheal strain was isolated 5 days after the gastric strain; it resisted the antibiotic but had the same ribotype as the gastric strain. Ribotypes of bacteria of the same species differed among patients, except for two patients (who were not hospitalized simultaneously) who harbored strains of P. aeruginosa with a similar ribotype.
Ribotypes were not done for six patients because the bacterial species were unique to each patient during the study period, were isolated on multiple occasions from one patient, and were only rarely encountered in our intensive care units. Therefore, based only on the species and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern, we assumed that the strains isolated at the different sites were identical.
Of the four patients with late-onset pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus, three had gastric colonization before the episodes, and two had high counts. The median gastric pH was greater than 4.0 in all four cases.
Mortality
|
|---|
|
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Late-onset pneumonia developed significantly more frequently in patients treated with antacid or ranitidine than in those treated with sucralfate. It can be argued that the diagnosis of pneumonia has been established on the basis of clinical criteria only, a method that has been shown to have a good sensitivity but suboptimal specificity. However, the overall incidence of pneumonia found in our study was low, and similar or even lower than that found in studies of similar patients investigated with bronchoscopy and protected brush specimens [44, 45]. It is therefore unlikely that pneumonia was grossly overdiagnosed. More importantly, the patients of the three groups were analyzed blindly according to predetermined criteria, and possible misdiagnoses should have been distributed equally among the groups.
Thus, because the groups were similar in their underlying characteristics, we postulate that the higher rates of late-onset pneumonia observed in patients treated with antacid or ranitidine were most likely a result of the gastric pH elevation induced by these agents. This theory is supported by the gastric pH measurements and colonization data. Patients receiving antacid or ranitidine had higher median gastric pH values and higher rates and magnitudes of gastric colonization than did patients receiving sucralfate; this was also reported by others [21, 43]. Detailed microbiologic investigations, including molecular typing, disclosed that in two thirds of the episodes of late-onset pneumonia, tracheal aspirates grew gram-negative bacilli, which were found in the stomach before pneumonia developed, often in large quantities. These results strongly suggest that the increased gastric pH and the subsequent gastric and tracheal colonization were the main factors accounting for the increased rates of late-onset pneumonia in the antacid and ranitidine groups compared with the sucralfate group. This is also consistent with recent data that have established a relation among duodenal reflux, gastric pH greater than 3.5, and subsequent bacterial colonization of the lower respiratory tract [10].
It is noteworthy that half of the patients receiving sucralfate had median gastric pH values greater than 4.0, a phenomenon already described by others [22, 46, 47] and attributed to gastric exocrine "failure" in severely ill patients. However, among these patients, those receiving sucralfate still had a lower rate of gastric colonization than those receiving antacids or ranitidine. This has also been observed by others [22] and may be related to an intrinsic antibacterial action of sucralfate [8, 48, 49]. The importance of this finding remains to be determined, and in our study no statistically significant difference in the incidence of late-onset pneumonia was found among the three groups when only patients with a gastric pH greater than 4.0 were considered. Therefore, the lower incidence of late-onset pneumonia in the sucralfate group appears to be mainly associated with the fact that half of the patients receiving this drug were able to maintain a low gastric pH and thus suppress bacterial growth.
Although the colonization rates of the oropharynx and the trachea were also lower in the patients receiving sucralfate than in the other two groups, this did not reach statistical significance for all comparisons among groups. This may be related to the definition of colonization we used, which has created a high background because during the entire study period, only two positive cultures for gram-negative bacilli were required to meet the criteria for colonization. However, in two studies similar to ours [21, 23], statistically significant differences were found in the colonization rates of the gastric and tracheal and oropharyngeal sites among patients receiving sucralfate and those receiving a pH-raising agent. Moreover, our study found that the rate of tracheal colonization with high bacterial counts was statistically lower in patients with a gastric pH lower than 4.0, suggesting again that the beneficial effect of sucralfate is essentially obtained in the subgroup of patients able to maintain a low gastric pH. Our results also agree with a recent study [10] that showed a correlation between organisms recovered from the lower respiratory tract and those from the stomach, but not with those found in the oropharynx.
Our study confirms and extends the findings of others [21-23, 25] who found fewer cases of pneumonia in patients receiving sucralfate than in those receiving pH-elevating agents. It shows that only patients who receive prolonged mechanical ventilation and are able to maintain a low gastric pH will benefit more from stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate than with agents raising the gastric pH. The clear identification of these two conditions helps explain some of the conflicting results observed in other comparative trials [18]. Thus, because a reduction in the risk for developing pneumonia can only be expected in a few patients, only studies of large randomized groups that include a high proportion of patients ventilated for prolonged periods can be expected to show a statistically significant difference in the development of pneumonia. These conditions were not fulfilled by several previous studies [17, 21, 26, 28]. Moreover, insufficient dosages of the pH-raising agents or wide use of enteral nutrition [20, 50] may result in gastric pH values similar to those in patients receiving sucralfate and patients receiving pH-raising agents. This may also account for the absence of differences in rates of pneumonia observed in some studies [17, 27, 29].
The crude mortality rate of patients in intensive care units who require prolonged mechanical ventilation, such as the patients included in our study, is between 30% and 40% [32, 40]. Although the mortality rate appeared to be lower in the patients treated with sucralfate, the differences from the other two groups were not statistically significant. This was not unexpected because the mortality directly caused by pneumonia can be estimated at 10% to 15% [32, 40] and was even lower in our study. Therefore, a much larger study would be necessary to observe a statistically significant reduction in the overall mortality.
Although the efficacy of various prophylactic regimens in the prevention of bleeding from stress ulcers has been controversial, a meta-analysis of 42 randomized and prospective studies involving 4409 patients [51] showed that antacids and H2-antagonist drugs were superior to placebo or no therapy in reducing the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. In comparative studies, sucralfate appeared to be as effective as antacids and H2-antagonists [20]. In our study, the rate of macroscopic gastrointestinal bleeding was not statistically different from that of the three treatment groups. One of the patients treated with sucralfate died as a direct result of a hemorrhage caused by stress ulcers, but this has also been described in patients treated with pH-elevating agents [2].
In conclusion, stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate was not found to be less effective in preventing gastric hemorrhage in mechanically ventilated patients compared with prophylaxis with ranitidine and antacid. Sucralfate reduces the risk for developing late-onset pneumonia by its ability to maintain a low gastric pH and reduce gastric bacterial colonization in many patients. However, half of mechanically ventilated patients receiving this drug have median gastric pH values greater than 4.0 and will not benefit from this "protective" effect. It may be indicated that these patients should be identified by monitoring their gastric pH because additional strategies, such as digestive decontamination [32, 52-59] or keeping the patient in a moderate upright position [60], may also be considered to prevent pneumonia of gastric origin in those patients ventilated for prolonged periods.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Peura DA. Stress-related mucosal damage: an overview. Am J Med. 1987; 83:3-7.
2. Jehle EC, Castiglione F, Blum AL. Prophylaxe der Stressulkus-Blutung: Eine Risiko-Nutzen-Analyse. Z Gastroenterol. 1990; 28: 315-21.
3. Schuster DP, Rowley H, Feinstein S, McGue MK, Zuckerman GR. Prospective evaluation of the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after admission to a medical intensive care unit. Am J Med. 1984; 76:623-30.
4. Wilcox CM, Spenney JG. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in medical patients: who, what, and how much? Am J Gastroenterol. 1988; 83: 1199-211.
5. Karlstadt R, Herson J, Palmer R, Frank W, Young M. Cimetidine reduces upper GI bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients (Abstract). Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84:1162.
6. du Moulin GC, Paterson DG, Hedley-Whyte J, Lisbon A. Aspiration of gastric bacteria in antacid-treated patients: a frequent cause of postoperative colonisation of the airway. Lancet. 1982; 1:242-5.
7. Donowitz LG, Page MC, Mileur BL, Guenthner SH. Alteration of normal gastric flora in critical care patients receiving antacid and cimetidine therapy. Infect Control. 1986; 7:23-6.
8. Daschner F, Kappstein I, Engels I, Reuschenbach K, Pfisterer J, Krieg N, et al. Stress ulcer prophylaxis and ventilation pneumonia: prevention by antibacterial cytoprotective agents? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988; 9:59-65.
9. Ruddell WS, Axon AT, Findlay JM, Bartholomew BA, Hill MJ. Effect of cimetidine of the gastric bacterial flora. Lancet. 1980; 1: 672-4.
10. Inglis TJ, Sherratt MJ, Sproat LJ, Gibson JS, Hawkey PM. Gastroduodenal dysfunction and bacterial colonisation of the ventilated lung. Lancet. 1993; 341:911-3.
11. Atherton ST, White DJ. Stomach as source of bacteria colonising respiratory tract during artificial ventilation. Lancet. 1978; 2:968-9.
12. Goularte TA, Lichtenberg DA, Craven DE. Gastric colonization in patients receiving antacids and mechanical ventilation: a mechanism for pharyngeal colonization (Abstract). Am J Infect Control. 1986; 14:88.
13. Pingleton SK, Hinthorn R, Liu C. Enteral nutrition in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Multiple sources of tracheal colonization include the stomach. Am J Med. 1986; 80:827-32.
14. Garvey BM, McCambley JA, Tuxen DV. Effects of gastric alkalization on bacterial colonization in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1989; 17:211-6.
15. Reusser P, Zimmerli W, Scheidegger D, Marbet GA, Buser M, Gyr K. Role of gastric colonization in nosocomial infections and endotoxemia: a prospective study in neurosurgical patients on mechanical ventilation. J Infect Dis. 1989; 160:414-21.
16. Brandl M, Hennig F, Batz GM, Hinzmann MH. Die Mikrobielle Besiedelung der peripheren Luftwege bei Intensivpatienten unter H2-Blocker-Therapie unter besonderer Berucksichtigung eines gastropulmonalen Infektionsweges (Abstract). Anesthesia. 1984; 34:257.
17. Simms HH, DeMaria E, McDonald L, Peterson D, Robinson A, Burchard KW. Role of gastric colonization in the development of pneumonia in critically ill trauma patients: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Trauma. 1991; 31:531-7.
18. Tryba M. The gastropulmonary route of infectionfact or fiction? Am J Med. 1991; 91:135-46.
19. Lacroix J, Infante-Rivard C, Jenicek M, Gauthier M. Prophylaxis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care units: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 1989; 17:862-9.
20. Tryba M. Sucralfate versus antacids or H2-antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis: a meta-analysis on efficacy and pneumonia rate. Crit Care Med. 1991; 19:942-9.
21. Driks MR, Craven DE, Celli BR, Manning M, Burke RA, Garvin GM, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. The role of gastric colonization. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317:1376-82.
22. Eddleston JM, Vohra A, Scott P, Tooth JA, Pearson RC, McCloy RF, et al. A comparison of the frequency of stress ulceration and secondary pneumonia in sucralfate- or ranitidine-treated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1991; 19:1491-6.
23. Kappstein I, Schulgen G, Friedrich T, Hellinger P, Benzing A, Geiger K, et al. Incidence of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients treated with sucralfate or cimetidine as prophylaxis for stress bleeding: bacterial colonization of the stomach. Am J Med. 1991; 91:125-31.
24. McCarthy DM. Sucralfate. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:1017-25.
25. Tryba M. Risk of acute stress bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated intensive care unit patients: sucralfate versus antacids. Am J Med. 1987; 83:117-24.
26. Garcia-Labattut A, Rodriguez-Munoz S, Gobernado-Serrano M, Moerno-Ortigosa A, Lopez-Gimeno A, Medina-Santaolalla P, et al. Sucralfate versus cimetidine in the stress bleeding prophylaxis (Abstract). Crit Care Med. 1990; 16 (Suppl 1):S19.
27. Ryan P, Dawson J, Teres D, Navab F. Continuous infusion of cimetidine versus sucralfate: incidence of pneumonia and bleeding compared (Abstract). Crit Care Med. 1990; 18:S253.
28. Colardyn F, Vogelaers D, Verschraegen G, Elewaut A, Barbier F. Cimetidine versus sucralfate for stress ulcer prophylaxis in medical intensive care patients (Abstract). Intensive Care Med. 1990; 16 (Suppl):S18.
29. Mahul P, Auboyer C, Jospe R, Ros A, Guerin C, el Khouri Z, et al. Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients: respective role of mechanical subglottic secretions drainage and stress ulcer prophylaxis. Intensive Care Med. 1992; 18:20-5.
30. Langer M, Cigada M, Mandelli M, Mosconi P, Tognoni G. Early-onset pneumonia: a multicenter study in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 1987; 13:342-6.
31. Lowy FD, Carlisle PS, Adams A, Feiner C. The incidence of nosocomial pneumonia following urgent endotracheal intubation. Infect Control. 1987; 8:245-8.
32. Pugin J, Auckenthaler R, Lew DP, Suter PM. Oropharyngeal decontamination decreases incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. JAMA. 1991; 265:2704-10.
33. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985; 13: 818-29.
34. Simon RH. Mechanism of lung injury. In: Dantzker DR, ed. Cardiopulmonary Critical Care. Orlando: Grune & Stratton, Inc.; 1986: 1-24.
35. Salata RA, Lederman MM, Schlaes DM, Jacobs MR, Eckstein E, Tweardy D, et al. Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated, intensive care unit patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987; 135:426-32.
36. Martinetti G, Altwegg M. rRNA gene restriction patterns and plasmid analysis as a tool for typing Salmonella enteritidis. Res Microbiol. 1990; 141:1151-62.
37. Blanc DS, Siegrist HH, Sahli R, Francioli P. Evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: discriminatory power and usefulness as a tool for epidemiological studies. J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31:71-7.
38. Langer M, Mosconi P, Cigada M, Mandelli M. Long-term respiratory support and risk of pneumonia in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Unit Group of Infection Control. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 140:302-5.
39. Cross AS, Roup B. Role of respiratory assistance devices in endemic nosocomial pneumonia. Am J Med. 1981; 70:681-5.
40. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Domart Y, Trouillet JL, Pierre J, Darne C, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation. Prospective analysis of 52 episodes with use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 139:877-84.
41. Kahn RJ, Serruys-Schoutens E, Brimioulle S, Vincent JL. Influence of antacid treatment on the tracheal flora in mechanically ventilated patients (Abstract). Crit Care Med. 1982; 10:229.
42. Hillmann KM, Riordan T, O'Farrell SM, Tabaqchali S. Colonization of the gastric contents in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1982; 10:444-7.
43. Forster A, Niethamer T, Suter P, Pitteloud JJ, Intante F, Ducel G, et al. Influence de la cimetidine sur la croissance bacterienne dans le liquide gastrique. Nouvelle Presse Med. 1982; 11:2281-3.
44. Chastre J, Fagon JY, Soler P, Bornet M, Domart Y, Trouillet JL, et al. Diagnosis of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in intubated patients undergoing ventilation: comparison of the usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage and the protected specimen brush. Am J Med. 1988; 85:499-506.
45. Pugin J, Auckenthaler R, Mili N, Janssens JP, Lew PD, Suter PM. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic blind bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991; 143:1121-9.
46. Stannard VA, Hutchison A, Morris DL, Byrne A. Gastric exocrine failure in critically ill patients: incidence and associated features. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988; 296:155-6.
47. Winter R, MacGowan AP, Speller DC, Willatts S. Gastric pH and colonisation in sucralfate treated patients (Letter). Intensive Care Med. 1989; 15:479.
48. Kappstein I, Engels I. Antibacterial activity of sucralfate and bismuth subsalicylate in simulated gastric fluid (Letter). Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 6:216-7.
49. Tryba M, Mantey-Stiers F. The antibacterial activity of sucralfate in human gastric juice. Am J Med. 1987; 83:125-7.
50. Jacobs S, Chang RW, Lee B, Bartlett FW. Continuous enteral feeding: a major cause of pneumonia among ventilated intensive care unit patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990; 14:353-6.
51. Cook DJ, Witt LG, Cook RJ, Guyatt GH. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 1991; 91:519-27.
52. Flaherty J, Nathan C, Kabins SA, Weinstein RA. Pilot trial of selective decontamination for prevention of bacterial infection in an intensive care unit. J Infect Dis. 1990; 162:1393-7.
53. Stoutenbeek CP, Van Saene HK, Miranda DR, Zandstra DF. The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on colonization: an infection rate in multiple trauma patients. Intensive Care Med. 1984; 10:185-92.
54. Stoutenbeek CP, van Saene HK, Miranda DR, Zandstra DF, Binnendijk B. The prevention of superinfection in multiple trauma patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984; 14(Suppl B):203-11.
55. Ledingham IM, Alcock SR, Eastaway AT, McDonald JC, McKay IC Ramsay G. Triple regimen of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, systemic cefotaxime, and microbiological surveillance for prevention of acquired infection in intensive care. Lancet. 1988; 1:785-90.
56. Unertl K, Ruckdeschel G, Selbmann HK, Jensen U, Forst H, Lenhart FP, et al. Prevention of colonization and respiratory infections in long-term ventilated patients by local antimicrobial prophylaxis. Intensive Care Med. 1987; 13:106-13.
57. Kerver AJ, Rommes JH, Mevissen-Verhage EA, Hulstaert PF, Vos A, Verhoef J, et al. Prevention of colonization and infection in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med. 1988; 16:1087-93.
58. Ulrich C, Harinck-de Weerd JE, Bakker NC, Jacz K, Doornbos L, de Ridder VA. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract with norfloxacin in the prevention of ICU-acquired infections: a prospective randomized study. Intensive Care Med. 1989; 15:424-31.
59. Tetteroo GW, Wagenvoort JH, Castelein A, Tilanus HW, Ince C, Bruining HA. Selective decontamination to reduce gram-negative colonisation and infections after oesophageal resection. Lancet. 1990; 335:704-7.
60. Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ros E, Piera C, Puig del Bellacasa J, Cobos A, et al. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the effect of body position. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116:540-3.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Gerber, K. Ojiako, H. Shingala, and C. Schorr Response Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2008; 17(4): 312 - 312. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ojiako, H. Shingala, C. Schorr, and D. R. Gerber Famotidine Versus Pantoprazole for Preventing Bleeding in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract of Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2008; 17(2): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lorente, S. Blot, and J. Rello Evidence on measures for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1193 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Canani, P. Cirillo, P. Roggero, C. Romano, B. Malamisura, G. Terrin, A. Passariello, F. Manguso, L. Morelli, A. Guarino, et al. Therapy With Gastric Acidity Inhibitors Increases the Risk of Acute Gastroenteritis and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e817 - e820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J D Hunter Ventilator associated pneumonia. Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 82(965): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kostadima, A. G. Kaditis, E. I. Alexopoulos, E. Zakynthinos, and D. Sfyras Early gastrostomy reduces the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia in stroke or head injury patients Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 106 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Martindale Contemporary strategies for the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2005; 62(10_Supplement_2): S11 - S17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2005; 171(4): 388 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Timmins, K. Hirota, and T. Kushikata Preanaesthetic H2 antagonists for acid aspiration pneumonia prophylaxis. Is there evidence of tolerance? Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 446 - 447. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Mehta and M. S. Niederman Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit: Controversies and Dilemmas J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 175 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Trotman-Dickenson Radiology in the Intensive Care Unit (Part I) J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 198 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chastre and J.-Y. Fagon Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 867 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||