Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
15 March 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 6 | Pages 470-475
Objective: To determine if the presence of antiphospholipid antibody [aPL] in healthy pregnant women is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, including 1) intrauterine fetal loss, 2) maternal pregnancy complications, 3) low birth weight, and 4) low 5-minute Apgar scores.
Design: Prospective cohort study in women with normal pregnancies.
Setting: Obstetrics clinic at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.
Patients: Eligible patients included 451 low-risk, nulliparous pregnant women who came to the obstetrics clinic before 25 weeks gestation; 408 were enrolled and 389 had blood drawn at the first prenatal visit and completed clinical follow-up.
Measurements: Blood for six aPL measures was drawn at the first prenatal visit and for 239 patients at delivery.
Results: Ninety-five patients (24.4%) had elevated aPL levels by one or more measures at the first prenatal visit: 15.8% of the aPL-positive and 6.5% of the aPL-negative patients experienced fetal loss (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.29 to 4.62). However, an elevated IgG anticardiolipin antibody level at the first prenatal visit was the only aPL measurement that was significantly associated with fetal loss (relative risk, 3.5; CI, 1.56 to 8.07). Adjustment for confounding variables decreased the relative risk of aPL for fetal loss slightly, but the difference remained statistically significant. Neither a positive aPL result at the initial visit nor a positive result at delivery was associated with maternal complications of pregnancy, low birth weight, or low Apgar scores.
Conclusions: Patients with elevated aPL levels at their initial prenatal visit had an increase in fetal loss but no increase in maternal pregnancy complications, low birth weight, or low Apgar scores. Immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin antibody was the only single test of aPL significantly associated with fetal loss.
Recent studies examined the value of aPL in predicting adverse fetal and maternal outcome in healthy pregnant women [20-24]. The correlation of aPL with low birth weight, intrauterine fetal death, and adverse complications of pregnancy was identified by some authors [21, 24-26] but not by others [22]. These studies concentrated on the predictive value of aPL as measured by anticardiolipin antibody (IgG, IgM) or lupus anticoagulant (activated partial thromboplastin time). Studies have not examined the individual and overlapping value of multiple measures of aPL in predicting pregnancy outcome.
We began this study primarily to investigate the association between the presence of aPL at the first prenatal visit and adverse pregnancy outcome in healthy pregnant women. We also examined the confounding effects of covariables and other potential pregnancy risk factors. To understand the natural history and temporal variation of these antibodies, we also measured aPL at delivery in a subgroup of our patients. We focused on clinically low-risk pregnant women in whom aPL would not be routinely requested. Thus, we chose women who had never been pregnant before or nulligravida women who had fewer than two spontaneous abortions. By adopting this approach, we eliminated the possible confounding effect of previous complications affecting pregnancy outcome and avoided the ethical dilemma of potential therapeutic intervention in the event of an aPL-positive test result.
We conducted the study at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center [UCHSC] after obtaining approval from the institutional review board. From August 1990 to July 1991, we invited all consecutive nulliparous patients seen in the Obstetrics Clinic before 25 weeks gestation to participate. Exclusion criteria were 1) a history of more than two spontaneous abortions; 2) a history of systemic lupus erythematosus; 3) current treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents; and 4) a history of thrombosis. We interviewed 451 women who met the inclusion criteria. Forty of them chose not to participate, and 3 were subsequently removed from the study (the fetus of 1 woman died in utero after maternal trauma and 2 women had therapeutic abortions). Four hundred and eight women were enrolled for prospective study. We obtained informed consent from all women at the first visit. We gathered data on age, race, marital status, and medical and obstetric history from the case records. Gestational age was determined by last menstrual period, fundal height, or ultrasound examination (when menstrual dates and fundal height did not concur). Thereafter, participants were followed by their attending physicians throughout pregnancy and at delivery. All pregnancies were completed by April 1992.
We reviewed case records when each pregnancy was completed. We collected data on the participants' use of cigarettes before and after conception and on the following defined pregnancy complications [27]: fetal loss (subdivided into before and after 20 weeks gestation), neonatal loss, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclamptic toxemia, abruptio placentae, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, premature rupture of the membranes, preterm labor, and preterm delivery and low birth weight. We noted Apgar scores at 5 minutes, birth weight, and gestational age at delivery. We collected follow-up data by mail and telephone for all patients who subsequently delivered outside UCHSC. The latter group included patients who moved to another hospital, moved out of state, or were lost to medical review after an early fetal loss at home. Of the 408 women originally enrolled, 389 had blood drawn at the first visit and completed clinical follow-up for maternal and fetal complications. This resulted in a 4.7% loss to clinical follow-up. Of the 389 patients who had blood drawn initially, 239 had samples drawn at delivery. The loss of samples at delivery was due to delivery at other sites, failure to follow study protocol (collect blood), or early fetal loss occurring in a nonmedical setting.
Blood Sample Processing
Blood samples were obtained at the first prenatal visit for activated partial thromboplastin time, dilute Russell viper venom time, rapid plasma reagin, and anticardiolipin antibody (IgG, IgM, and IgA) and at delivery for dilute Russell viper venom time and the three isotypes of anticardiolipin antibody. To ensure that all investigators reviewing charts for pregnancy outcome were blinded to aPL results, dilute Russell viper venom time and anticardiolipin antibody measurements were not done until after completion of pregnancy. Blood samples were drawn for serum and plasma by standard techniques. Platelet-poor plasma (<5000 platelets/µL) was obtained by centrifugation at 3300g to remove the cell mass and platelets. An activated partial thromboplastin time test was done immediately on an aliquot of plasma from the first prenatal visit. The remaining plasma was frozen at 70°C for subsequent testing for dilute Russell viper venom time. Serum was separated from the cell mass and frozen at 70°C to determine the anticardiolipin antibody isotypes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Evaluation of Anticardiolipin Antibodies
Anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG, IgM, and IgA) were measured in duplicate using the commercial anticardiolipin antibody ELISA kit (REAADS Medical Products, Westminster, Colorado). Briefly, serum samples, control sera, and calibrator sera were diluted 1:50 in sample diluent (0.01 mol/L phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 10% bovine serum). One hundred µL of diluted serum was incubated in duplicate wells of 96-well plates coated with beef heart cardiolipin (diphosphatidyl glycerol) for 15 minutes at room temperature. The serum was removed and the wells were washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline. One hundred µL of a prediluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antihuman IgG or IgM or rabbit anti-IgA was added to each well and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. After washing, 100 µL of a 1:1 substrate mixture of tetramethylbenzidine and H2O2 was added to the microwells and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. Color development was stopped by addition of 100 µL of 2.5 N H2SO4 and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using an Emax microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, California). The values of anticardiolipin antibody activity for each sample were calculated from calibrator sera according to the manufacturer's instructions. This assay was standardized relative to the international reference preparations (original 1984 set) obtained from the Anti-Phospholipid Standardization Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. The normal cutoff value of the assay (23 units IgG, 11 units IgM) was defined as the mean IgG or IgM units plus two standard deviations of a healthy patient group. Immunoglobulin A anticardiolipin antibody activity was assessed using REAADS IgA anticardiolipin antibody test kit. A positive level (22 units) was defined as the mean plus three standard deviations of a healthy patient group.
Rapid plasma reagin was measured by standard procedure. For women who tested positive, fluorescent Treponema antibody confirmatory tests were done at the Colorado State Department of Health Laboratory. If these test results were negative, the rapid plasma reagin was labeled false-positive.
Evaluation of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
Platelet-poor plasma was incubated for 3 minutes at 37 °C with activated partial thromboplastin time reagent (Auto-aPT; Organon Teknika, Durham, North Carolina) and the time to clot formation was measured by standard procedure (coagumate/2000, Organon Teknika). A value that was 2 or more standard deviations above the mean for healthy controls was considered abnormal.
Evaluation of Dilute Russell Viper Venom Time
Platelet-poor plasma (100 µL) was added to a mixture of dilute phospholipid (1/400 dilution Rabbit Brain Cephalin; Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Missouri) and 200 µL Russell's Viper Venom (1/40 000 dilution of 1 mg crude venom; Sigma Chemicals). After 1 minute, 100 µL calcium ions (0.25 mmol/L) was added and the time for clot formation was determined. The established range, based on frozen samples from 50 healthy, nonsmoking, nonpregnant persons of both sexes taking no medications was 26 to 32 seconds (mean ±2 SD).
Statistical Analysis
An aPL profile was created from the six aPL tests done at the first prenatal visit. This profile was called abnormal for a woman if she had one or more abnormal results on any test in the profile. Classification based on this profile was the primary risk variable examined. The primary outcome variable was fetal death. Because the number of abnormal profiles was small (95 of 389), confounding variables (age, sex, race, and so on) were first examined singly using relative risk, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests to determine their effect on either the risk or outcome variable. Any variables whose chi-square probability values were less than 0.1 for association with either the risk or outcome variable were entered into a logistic regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables. Finally, the primary risk variable was broken down into its individual test components and the relation of these to the outcome variable was examined using relative risk, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests. A similar profile, but without the activated partial thromboplastin time and rapid plasma reagin, was created at delivery. This delivery profile was compared with fetal loss and with pregnancy complications in a manner similar to the primary risk variable described above.
Those women who had more than one aPL-positive test result at either the prenatal or the delivery examination were analyzed to determine if their probability of experiencing fetal loss or a complication of pregnancy was higher than for those women who had only one positive test result. Those women who were positive at both the prenatal visit and at delivery were examined in a similar manner. Finally, the joint distribution of test scores at the prenatal visit and delivery was examined for an indication of systematic shift. All analyses were done using the SAS statistical package (Cary, North Carolina).
The mean maternal age at study entry was 21.55 years and the mean gestational age when the first blood was draw was 13.15 weeks. Most of our study population were single mothers (75.8%). The racial distribution was 73.3% white, 15.4% black, and 6.7% Hispanic; other races accounted for 4.6% (Table 1). ARTICLE
Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Study
Antibodies to cardiolipin and the lupus anticoagulant are overlapping subsets of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and were originally described in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [1-5] and subsequently in those with other rheumatic diseases [2, 6-8]. These antibodies can also occur in nonrheumatologic disorders [9-12] and in healthy persons [13, 14]. The presence of these antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with the clinical features of thrombosis, fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia [15-18]. However, in nonautoimmune and healthy persons, the association of aPL with these clinical features has not been proved [14, 19, 20]. In addition, the value of different measures of aPL in predicting clinical symptoms has not been clearly defined. Furthermore, there is a paucity of prospective studies describing the natural history of aPL and identifying the subset of aPL-positive patients who need therapeutic intervention.
Methods
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Study Design
Results
![]()
Top
Methods
Results
Discussion
Author & Article Info
References
Patient Demographics
|
Frequency of Different Measures of Antiphospholipid Antibodies
The frequency of positive aPL results at the first prenatal visit and at delivery is shown in Table 2. The rates of aPL positivity at delivery are based only on patients who delivered at UCHSC and had blood drawn at the time of delivery. Some patients who were positive at initial presentation were negative at delivery and vice versa. Consequently, the prevalence rates at the initial visit and at delivery do not necessarily represent the same women. Results of McNemar paired tests done on the 239 women for whom an aPL profile was obtained at both the prenatal and the delivery visit were not significant (P = 0.14), indicating no significant shift in the aPL status of specific women between the prenatal visit and delivery. However, 33 women changed from a positive aPL profile at the first visit to a negative profile at delivery, and 34 women changed from a negative profile at the first prenatal visit to a positive profile at delivery. These data suggest that considerable variation may exist in serial aPL results during pregnancy.
|
Relation of Antiphospholipid Antibody to Fetal Loss
A positive result on any component of the aPL profile at the first prenatal visit was significantly associated with fetal loss (Table 3). Of the aPL profile-positive women, 15.8% had fetal loss, compared with 6.5% of the aPL profile-negative women (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.29 to 4.62; P = 0.011). The relative risk of an adverse fetal outcome was increased for all measures of aPL except IgM anticardiolipin antibody and IgA anticardiolipin antibody. However, the only single aPL test that was significantly associated with fetal loss was IgG anticardiolipin antibody (relative risk, 3.54; CI, 1.56 to 8.07; P = 0.014). A positive result on the aPL profile or any individual measure of aPL at delivery was not significantly associated with fetal loss (data not shown). Thirteen patients had a history of more than one spontaneous abortion. A history of abortion was not significantly associated with fetal loss or the presence of aPL.
|
Maternal age, race, cigarette use during pregnancy, and gestational age at first prenatal visit were associated with either the primary risk (aPL profile) or primary outcome (fetal loss) variables. All of these confounding variables were therefore entered into a single logistic regression with the primary risk variable. Even when adjusted for these confounding variables, the adjusted relative risk of a positive aPL profile for fetal loss remained significant (adjusted relative risk, 1.57; CI, 1.08 to 2.29). Similarly, the adjusted relative risk of IgG anticardiolipin antibody was 1.92 (CI, 1.07 to 3.44). Having more than one positive aPL test result at either visit, having a positive test result at both the prenatal visit and at delivery, or both did not significantly increase the risk for fetal loss.
Six fetuses died in the anticardiolipin antibody-positive groups. Five were positive for IgG anticardiolipin antibody and 1 was positive for IgM anticardiolipin antibody. These fetal losses were all in women whose anticardiolipin antibody levels were in the low-positive range (23 to 40 IgG antiphospholipid units; 11 to 20 IgM antiphospholipid units). Four of the fetal losses associated with IgG anticardiolipin antibody occurred before 20 weeks gestation and the other was an intrauterine death at 28 weeks gestation. The only fetal loss in the IgM anticardiolipin antibody-positive women occurred at 23 weeks gestation. Only one patient tested positive for IgA anticardiolipin antibody and her pregnancy was uncomplicated. Six fetuses died before 20 weeks gestation in women whose dilute Russell viper venom time values were in the low-positive range (2 to 2.5 SD above the mean). Three women had a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (range, 34 to 39 seconds) and experienced fetal loss before 20 weeks gestation.
Relation of Antiphospholipid Antibody to Maternal Complications of Pregnancy
The number of pregnancy-associated complications was small (Table 4). We found no significant association between aPL at the first prenatal visit or at delivery and any complications of pregnancy.
|
Birth Weights and Apgar Scores
Birth weights at delivery of live-born children were examined as a function of aPL positivity at first prenatal visit and at delivery. The mean birth weight of neonates born to mothers who were aPL positive at the first prenatal visit was slightly higher than the mean birth weight of neonates born to mothers who were aPL negative (3343 g compared with 3238 g; P = 0.19). A higher mean birth weight was noted in the aPL-positive group for each measure of the aPL profile at first visit and at delivery. This trend for increased birth weight in aPL-positive patients was statistically significant in patients with a positive activated partial thromboplastin time test result at the first prenatal visit (P = 0.01) and in patients positive for IgG anticardiolipin antibody at delivery (P = 0.04). Neonates born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy had a lower mean birth weight than those born to nonsmokers (P = 0.04). Apgar scores were considered abnormal if they were less than 7 at 5 minutes. There was no significant association between an abnormal aPL profile or any abnormal aPL test result at the first prenatal visit or at delivery and low Apgar scores. Mean Apgar scores were not significantly different among neonates born to aPL-positive (mean, 8.84 ±0.43) and aPL-negative mothers (mean, 8.47 ±1.6).
Discussion
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is noteworthy that 24.4% of our pregnant women had an abnormal aPL profile, defined as an abnormal result on any single aPL test. A significant portion of the patients with aPL positivity in our study consisted of those with an abnormal dilute Russell viper venom time. Data on the lupus anticoagulant in healthy women is sparse, and the proportion of our participants with an abnormal lupus anticoagulant is higher than that previously reported for nonpregnant women [14]. Alterations in coagulation factors occur during pregnancy [28] that can affect the normal range of anticoagulant tests, such as the activated partial thromboplastin time [29]. The normal range of the dilute Russell viper venom time in this study was derived from healthy, nonsmoking, nonpregnant women and men who fasted. Although not previously shown [30], the use of frozen specimens may also have contributed to our high proportion of positive results. Thus, these factors may need to be considered when defining the "normal" range of dilute Russell viper venom time in pregnant women.
Our data indicate that only a few of our patients had more than one positive aPL test result and that aPL positivity varied considerably between the first prenatal visit and delivery. These observations are consistent with the work of Out and colleagues [31], who showed that some patients have persistently elevated levels of aPL and others have levels that fluctuate significantly over time. These investigators postulated that patients with persistently elevated levels of aPL are at the highest risk for complications. Unfortunately, our data do not allow us to address this question because repeated measures of aPL were not obtained for most of the patients who experienced early fetal loss. Nevertheless, our data emphasize that aPL levels may fluctuate during pregnancy. In contrast to previous reports [16, 26], the aPL level in the aPL-positive women with fetal loss was relatively low. However, in keeping with the findings in other patient groups [16] and recent animal studies [32], our results suggest that IgG anticardiolipin antibody is a better predictor of fetal loss than any other measure of aPL.
We postulated that aPL may act with several other risk factors to cause clinical symptoms. Therefore, we examined the effect of confounding variables on fetal outcome and entered these variables into logistic regression analysis with aPL. This analysis showed that a positive aPL profile and IgG anticardiolipin antibody were important risk factors for fetal loss independent of other variables. However, nearly 85% of patients with an abnormal aPL profile at the first prenatal visit had a normal pregnancy. The role of aPL in pregnancy loss is complex [21, 24]. The specific characteristics of the aPL and the presence of other factors that interact with aPL may play a critical role in determining the pathogenicity of aPL. Until these co-risk factors are identified [33] and pathogenic subsets of aPL [34] are better defined, screening of healthy pregnant women for the presence of aPL is not justified.
We could not show an association between aPL and maternal complications of pregnancy. This correlated with the findings of Harris and Spinnato [22] but was in contrast to other studies of selected [25, 35] and unselected patient groups [24] that showed that aPL positivity is associated with materno-fetal complications such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclamptic toxemia, and low birth weight. However, complications in our study were few (thus reducing the power of the study), which may account for our inability to detect an increase in pregnancy complications in the aPL-positive group. Birth weights and Apgar scores of infants born to aPL-positive mothers were actually greater than these variables in infants born to aPL-negative mothers. Polzin and associates [25] showed an association between aPL positivity and intrauterine growth retardation based on examination of a highly select group of women. Our contrasting findings may have resulted from selection bias or may reflect a complex interaction of aPL positivity and intrauterine growth retardation; that is, intrauterine growth retardation in our aPL-positive mothers may have resulted in fetal death, and therefore only large fetuses could survive in aPL-positive mothers.
We showed that the presence of elevated levels of aPL at the first prenatal visit (< 25 weeks gestation) in women with normal pregnancies is associated with an increased risk for fetal loss. A positive aPL result was not associated with other complications of pregnancy, low live birth weights, or low Apgar scores. Comparison of aPL measurement at the first prenatal visit and at delivery showed variations in aPL levels, suggesting that aPL levels fluctuate during pregnancy and that serial studies of aPL may be necessary to better define the clinical associations of these antibodies. Despite the increased risk for fetal loss associated with aPL positivity, we showed clearly that in the absence of any therapeutic interventions, a subgroup of our aPL-positive cohort had successful pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, it is not appropriate to screen for aPL in first pregnancies until the indications for therapeutic intervention are more clearly defined and other factors that contribute to aPL pathogenicity [36-38] are better understood.
Author and Article Information
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Boey ML, Patel BM, Mackworth-Young CG, Loizou S, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 1983; 2:1211-4.
2. Love PE, Santoro SA. Antiphospholipid antibodies: anticardiolipin and the lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in non-SLE disorders. Prevalence and clinical significance. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112:682-98.
3. Lockshin MD, Druzin ML, Goei S, Qamar T, Magid MS, Jovanovic L, et al. Antibody to cardiolipin as a predictor of fetal distress or death in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313:152-6.
4. Petri M, Rheinschmidt M, Whiting-O'Keefe Q, Hellmann D, Corash L. The frequency of lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus. A study of sixty consecutive patients by activated partial thromboplastin time, Russell viper venom time, and anticardiolipin antibody level. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 106:524-31.
5. Lopez LR, Santos ME, Espinoza LR, La Rosa FG. Clinical significance of immunoglobulin A versus immunoglobulins G and M anti-cardiolipin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Correlation with thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and recurrent abortion. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992; 98:449-54.
6. Hull RG, Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Tincani A, Asherson RA, Valesini G, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies: occurrence in Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984; 43,746-8.
7. Keane A, Woods R, Dowding V, Roden D, Barry C. Anticardiolipin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1987; 26:346-50.
8. Fort JG, Cowchock FS, Abruzzo JL, Smith JB. Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with rheumatic diseases. Arth Rheum. 1987; 30: 752-60.
9. Levine SR, Welch KM. The spectrum of neurologic disease associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus anticoagulants and anticardiolipin antibodies. Arch Neurol. 1987; 44:876-83.
10. Manoussakis MN, Tzioufas AG, Silis MP, Pange PJ, Goudevenos J, Moutsopoulos HM. High prevalence of anti-cardiolipin and other autoantibodies in a healthy elderly population. Clin Exp Immunol. 1987; 69:557-65.
11. Zarrabi MH, Zucker S, Miller F, Derman RM, Romano GS, Hartnett JA, et al. Immunologic and coagulation disorders in chlorpromazine-treated patients. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 91:194-9.
12. Mulhall BP, Naselli G, Whittingham S. Anticardiolipin antibodies in homosexual men: prevalence and lack of association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. J Clin Immunol. 1989; 9: 208-13.
13. Parke AL, Wilson D, Maier D. The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion, women with successful pregnancies, and women who have never been pregnant. Arthritis Rheum. 1991; 34:1231-5.
14. Shi W, Krilis SA, Chong BH, Gordon G, Chesterman CN. Prevalence of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in a healthy population. Aust N Z J Med. 1990; 20:231-6.
15. Feinstein DI. Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, fetal loss, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Blood. 1992; 80:859-62.
16. Harris EN, Chan JK, Asherson RA, Aber VR, Gharavi AE, Hughes GR. Thrombosis, recurrent fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia. Predictive value of the anticardiolipin antibody test. Arch Intern Med. 1986; 146:2153-6.
17. Lockshin MD, Qamar T, Druzin ML, Goei S. Antibody to cardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant, and fetal death. J Rheumtol. 1987; 14:259-61.
18. Alarcon-Segovia D, Sanchez-Guerrero J. Primary antiphospholipid syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1989; 16:482-8.
19. McNeil HP, Chesterman CN, Krilis SA. Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies. Adv Immunol. 1991; 49: 193-280.
20. Laskin CA, Soloninka CA. Anticardiolipin antibodies: smoking gun or smoke screen? J Rheumatol. 1988; 15:7-9.
21. Lockwood CJ, Romero R, Feinberg RF, Clyne LP, Coster B, Hobbins JC. The prevalence and biologic significance of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in a general obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161:369-73.
22. Harris EN, Spinnato JA. Should anticardiolipin tests be performed in otherwise healthy pregnant women? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165:1272-7.
23. Infante-Rivard C, David M, Gauthier R, Rivard GE. Lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies, and fetal loss. A casecontrol study. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:1063-6.
24. Robinson RD, McGlasson GL. Evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies in an obstetric population. Fifth International Symposium on Antiphospholipid Antibodies. September 9-12, 1992, San Antonio, Texas.
25. Polzin WJ, Kopelman JN, Robinson RD, Read JA, Brady K. The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78:1108-11.
26. Brown HL, Perez MC, Wilson W, Scopelitis E. Anticardiolipin antibodies in an unselected obstetric population: relationship to fetal outcome. Abstract 272. Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, Tenth Annual Meeting, January 23-27, 1990.
27. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Anderson GD, eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1986.
28. Bonnar J. Acute and chronic coagulation problems in pregnancy. In: Poller L, ed. Recent Advances in Blood Coagulation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1977:363-78.
29. Triplett DA. Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1989; 20:52-67.
30. Tate G, Scott JS. Detection of lupus anticoagulant in stored serum (Letter). Lancet. 1984; 2:587.
31. Out HJ, Bruinse HW, Christiaens GC, van Vleit M, de Groot PG, Nieuwenhuis HK, et al. A prospective, controlled multicenter study on the obstetric risks of pregnant women with antiphospholipid antibodies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167:26-32.
32. Branch DW, Dudley DJ, Mitchell MD, Creighton KA, Abbott TM, Hammond EH, et al. Immunoglobulin G fractions from patients with antiphospholipid antibodies cause fetal death in BALB/c mice: a model for autoimmune fetal loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 210-6.
33. Lockshin MD, Letendre CH. Antiphospholipid antibody/lupus anticoagulant workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 1992; 35:1234-7.
34. Rote NS, Walter A, Lyden TW. Antiphospholipid antibodieslobsters or red herrings? Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992; 28:31-7.
35. Branch DW, Andres R, Digre KB, Rote NS, Scott JR. The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73:541-5.
36. McNeil HP, Simpson RJ, Chesterman CN, Krilis SA. Anti-phospholipid antibodies are directed against a complex antigen that includes a lipid-binding inhibitor of coagulation ß 2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87:4120-4.
37. Galli M, Comfurius P, Maassen C, Hemker HC, de Beets MH, van Breda-Vriesman PJ, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) directed not to cardiolipin but to a plasma protein cofactor. Lancet. 1990; 335:1544-7.
38. Rauch J, Tannenbaum M, Janoff AS. Distinguishing plasma lupus anticoagulants from anti-factor antibodies using hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids. Thromb Haemost. 1989; 62:892-6.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Leanos-Miranda, G. Cardenas-Mondragon, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, I. Isordia-Salas, A. Parra, and J. Ramirez-Peredo Anti-prolactin autoantibodies in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus: maternal and fetal outcome Lupus, May 1, 2007; 16(5): 342 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Giles, N. Lambrianides, N. Pattni, D. Faulkes, D. Latchman, P. Chen, S. Pierangeli, D. Isenberg, and A. Rahman Arginine Residues Are Important in Determining the Binding of Human Monoclonal Antiphospholipid Antibodies to Clinically Relevant Antigens J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1729 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lim, M. A. Crowther, and J. W. Eikelboom Management of Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 1, 2006; 295(9): 1050 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N BIZZARO, A ANTICO, M MUSSO, S PLATZGUMMER, L CAMOGLIANO, R TOZZOLI, and D VILLALTA A Prospective Study of 1038 Pregnancies on the Predictive Value of Anti-Annexin V Antibodies for Fetal Loss Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2005; 1050(1): 348 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Nielsen and O. B. Christiansen Prognostic impact of anticardiolipin antibodies in women with recurrent miscarriage negative for the lupus anticoagulant Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1720 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Lee, M. A. Brown, D. W. Branch, K. Ward, and R. M. Silver Anticardiolipin and Anti-{beta}2-Glycoprotein-I Antibodies in Preeclampsia Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2003; 102(2): 294 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Tincani, W Branch, R A Levy, J C Piette, H Carp, R S Rai, M Khamashta, and Y Shoenfeld Treatment of pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome Lupus, July 1, 2003; 12(7): 524 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Heilmann, G.-F. v. Tempelhoff, and K. Pollow Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Obstetrics Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Roberts, M M Gordon, D Porter, A G Jardine, and I W Gibson Acute renal failure complicating HELLP syndrome, SLE and anti-phospholipid syndrome: successful outcome using plasma exchange therapy Lupus, April 1, 2003; 12(4): 251 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Empson, M. Lassere, J. C. Craig, and J. R. Scott Recurrent Pregnancy Loss With Antiphospholipid Antibody: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Trials Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2002; 99(1): 135 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Buyon, D. Nugent, E. Mellins, and C. Sandborg Maternal Immunologic Diseases and Neonatal Disorders NeoReviews, January 1, 2002; 3(1): e3 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. MASAMOTO, T. TOMA, K. SAKUMOTO, and K. KANAZAWA Clearance of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Pregnancies Treated With Heparin Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2001; 97(3): 394 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 163 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R H W M DERKSEN, P. G DE GROOT, H K NIEUWENHUIS, and G C M L CHRISTIAENS How to treat women with antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnancy? Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2001; 60(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 280 - 299. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Mavragani, J. P. A. Ioannidis, A. G. Tzioufas, I. E. Hantoumi, and H. M. Moutsopoulos Recurrent pregnancy loss and autoantibody profile in autoimmune diseases Rheumatology, December 1, 1999; 38(12): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bizzaro, P. Pasini, and B. Finco False-Positive Reactions for IgA Anti-Phospholipid and Anti-{beta}2-Glycoprotein I Antibodies in Patients with IgA Monoclonal Gammopathy Clin. Chem., November 1, 1999; 45(11): 2007 - 2010. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.D. Kaider, C.B. Coulam, and R.G. Roussev Murine embryos as a direct target for some human autoantibodies in vitro Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2556 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. LYNCH, T. BYERS, W. EMLEN, D. RYNES, S. M. SHETTERLY, and R. F. HAMMAN Association of Antibodies to Beta2-Glycoprotein 1 With Pregnancy Loss and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension: A Prospective Study in Low-Risk Pregnancy Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 1999; 93(2): 193 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lynch, J. Rutledge, J. Stephens, J. Murphy, R. Marlar, G. Davila, M. Santos, and W. Emlen Longitudinal measurement of anticardiolipin antibodies during normal pregnancy: a prospective study Lupus, October 1, 1995; 4(5): 365 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Barbui and G. Finazzi Clinical Trials on Antiphospholipid Syndrome: What is Being Done and What is Needed? Lupus, August 1, 1994; 3(4): 303 - 307. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Lockshin Antiphospholipid Antibody: Future Developments Lupus, August 1, 1994; 3(4): 309 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||