Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Thadani, U.
space
  arrow  Hinderaker, P. H.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Lack of Pharmacologic Tolerance and Rebound Angina Pectoris during Twice-daily Therapy with Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate

right arrow Udho Thadani; Claude R. Maranda; Ezra Amsterdam; Leo Spaccavento; Richard G. Friedman; Robert Chernoff; Stephen Zellner; Jeffrey Gorwit; and Paul H. Hinderaker

1 March 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 5 | Pages 353-359

Objective: To determine whether isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN), an active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, when given twice daily (in the morning and 7 hours later), prevents development of tolerance and reduction in exercise performance or is associated with a rebound increase in anginal attacks in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Design: Multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized study.

Setting: Four university teaching hospitals and five private cardiology outpatient clinics.

Patients: 116 patients with stable exertional angina who stopped treadmill exercise because of angina pectoris.

Intervention: After stopping all antianginal drugs with the exception of ß-blockers, patients received single-blind placebo for 1 week followed by either 20 mg of IS-5-MN (n = 60 patients) or placebo (n = 62 patients) twice daily at 0800 hours and 1500 hours for 2 weeks.

Measurements: Serial symptom-limited exercise tests and patients' diaries recording activity and date, time, and severity of anginal attacks.

Results: Compared with placebo recipients, patients receiving IS-5-MN walked significantly longer at 2, 5, and 7 hours after the 0800-hour dose (P < 0.01) and at 2 and 5 hours after the 1500-hour dose (P < 0.01). Before the morning (0800-hour) dose, exercise duration increased by 0.53 minutes in placebo recipients and by 0.85 minutes in those receiving IS-5-MN therapy (P = 0.10). Neither nocturnal nor early-morning anginal attacks increased during IS-5-MN therapy compared with placebo. Headaches occurred in 19 (32%) patients in the IS-5-MN group and in 9 (15%) patients in the placebo group but necessitated discontinuation of treatment in only 2 (3%) patients in the IS-5-MN group.

Conclusion: Isosorbide-5-mononitrate, 20 mg twice daily given 7 hours apart, was well tolerated and improved exercise performance for 7 hours after the morning dose and for 5 hours after the afternoon dose without evidence of development of pharmacologic tolerance. No rebound increase in anginal attacks was found.


Long-acting nitrates are widely used to treat patients with stable angina pectoris [1, 2]. Around-the-clock antianginal prophylactic therapy with nitrate preparations is not possible because of the rapid development of tolerance during long-term, continuous nitrate therapy [3-16]. Tolerance can be minimized by the intermittent administration of nitrates, with dosage schedules resulting in low plasma nitrate levels for 12 hours or longer [17-29], for example, when isosorbide dinitrate (20 or 30 mg) was used only two or three times a day with a 14- to 19-hour interval between doses [17, 18]. However, in these studies, only the efficacy of the morning dose was evaluated [17, 18]. Tolerance has also been minimized when the patches were applied during the day and removed at night for 8 to 12 hours [19-21, 25, 27]. However, such intermittent therapy may lead to a rebound increase in nocturnal angina during the patch-free interval [21] as well as diminished exercise performance in the morning just before reapplication of the patch [21]. This zero-hour effect may represent a rebound phenomenon caused by increased coronary vasomotor tone after nitrate withdrawal.

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN), the major active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, is almost 100% bioavailable after oral administration [30, 31] and exerts prolonged antianginal effects [32, 33]. In December 1991, IS-5-MN was approved in the United States for clinical use in a regimen of two 20-mg doses given 7 hours apart. Continuous therapy three or four times a day with 50 mg of this agent produced tolerance [34]. Twice-daily doses of 20 to 40 mg given at 0800 and 2000 hours did not provide antianginal protection throughout the dose interval and produced partial tolerance [35-37]. We did a multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and duration of antianginal effects of 0800-hour and 1500-hour doses of 20 mg of IS-5-MN during twice-daily therapy.


Methods
space
up arrowTop
dotMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Men and women attending the referral outpatient cardiology clinics of four university hospitals and the offices of five private cardiologists, with a history of exertional angina pectoris that was stable for at least 3 months, were considered for the trial. Patients were required to have evidence of myocardial ischemia or coronary artery disease. During stress testing, evidence of myocardial ischemia consisted of flat or down-sloping ST-segment depression of at least 1 mm, persisting for 0.08 seconds after the J point. In the absence of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia, patients were eligible for the study provided that at least one of the following criteria was met: 1) documented previous myocardial infarction; 2) obstructive coronary artery disease, with at least 70% cross-sectional obstruction of the right or left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery or 50% luminal obstruction of the left main coronary artery; 3) reversible or fixed perfusion defect during thallium stress test; or 4) regional wall motion abnormality during stress radionuclide angiography. Patients were not required to have a minimum number of anginal attacks during daily activity to be included in the study.

Patients with the following medical conditions were excluded: documented myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, or coronary angioplasty within the previous 3 months; clinically significant valvular or congenital cardiac disease; peripheral vascular disease; history of uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure >105 mm Hg) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg); cardiac arrhythmias; conduction disturbances, left bundle-branch block, or a permanent pacemaker; left ventricular hypertrophy; congestive heart failure; active liver or renal disease; febrile illness; anemia (hemoglobin < 100 g/L); clinically significant metabolic dysfunction; severe pulmonary disease; morbid obesity; inability to undergo repeated exercise tests; contraindication or hypersensitivity to nitrates; psychiatric disturbance requiring drug therapy; or substance abuse.

With the exception of ß-adrenergic blockers, all other antianginal drugs, including calcium channel blockers, long-acting nitrates, or other vasodilator compounds, were withdrawn for at least five half-lives before study entry. Patients who could be safely withdrawn from antianginal medications and remained medically stable were included in the study. Sublingual nitroglycerin was allowed for the relief of an anginal attack but was not allowed for prophylactic use. Cardiac glycosides and {alpha}-agonists or -antagonists were not allowed.

Study Design

The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution. Patients signed a consent form. The screening treadmill test (visit 1) was done using the modified Bruce protocol (starting stage, 1.7 mph; grade, 5%) [38]. Patients who stopped exercise because of angina of moderate severity between 3 minutes 15 seconds to 10 minutes were asked to continue in the study. On the subsequent study days, patients ate a standardized light lunch and a light evening meal, 2 to 2.5 hours before the scheduled exercise tests.

Single-blind Placebo Administration

For the first week, patients took placebo at 0800 hours and 1500 hours under single-blind conditions. In addition, patients who were receiving ß-adrenergic-blocking drugs continued taking them without a dose or schedule change throughout the study. After 5 to 9 days, four stress tests were done (visit 2). The first exercise test was done half an hour before the morning dose of single-blind placebo, and the other three tests were done at 2, 5, and 7 hours after the morning dose. After the hour-7 exercise test, patients took the 1500-hour dose of medication.

Criteria To Continue in the Double-blind Study

To qualify for the double-blind portion of the study, the following criteria had to be met: 1) Patients had to stop exercise because of angina of moderate severity; 2) on at least three of four tests done at visit 2, patients had to reach the end point of moderately severe angina within 3 minutes 15 seconds and 10 minutes; and 3) the time to moderate anginal pain for the stress test done at screening (visit 1) and the test done 2 hours after the dose of single-blind placebo (visit 2) had to be within 25% of each other.

Assignment to Treatment Groups

Patients meeting the eligibility criteria above were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: placebo or IS-5-MN, 20 mg, to be taken twice daily at 0800 hours and 1500 hours. The study medications, IS-5-MN and placebo, were supplied as identical tablets. The patients were enrolled sequentially with the exception that nonqualifying patients were replaced within the same treatment group. A blocked randomization schedule (blocked in groups of four) was used to maintain equality of randomized patients within the treatment groups.

Follow-up

Patients received the double-blind medication for the next 2 weeks and returned at the end of each week (visits 3 and 4) for further symptom-limited exercise tests. At these two visits, patients arrived before they had taken the morning dose of medication; after doing their first exercise test of the day (predose exercise test), they took the 0800-hour dose. At visits 3 and 4, patients did exercise tests according to a randomly assigned schedule (schedule 1 or schedule 2). Patients assigned to schedule 1 had stress testing at hours 2, 5, and 7 after the morning dose at visit 3 and at hours 2 and 5 after the 1500-hour dose at visit 4. Patients assigned to schedule 2 did the afternoon stress tests at visit 3 and the morning stress tests at visit 4. Thus, each patient was studied after both the morning and afternoon dose of the double-blind medication.

Measurements

A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded, and cuff blood pressure was taken before all treadmill tests throughout the study. During exercise and for a 9-minute recovery period afterward, electrocardiographic monitoring was done. Periodically during exercise, electrocardiograms and blood pressure measurements were obtained. Average heart rate and ST-segment depression were determined. The end point during exercise was angina of moderate severity. During the screening evaluation and single-blind placebo administration, this was the only acceptable reason for premature exercise discontinuation in patients who continued into the double-blind phase. Once patients were in the double-blind portion of the study, other reasons for exercise discontinuation, such as fatigue or excessive dyspnea, were allowed for patients who did not experience angina.

Throughout the study, the patients kept a diary with the time and date for each anginal attack. They rated the severity and recorded duration and cause for the attacks. They also recorded any sublingual nitroglycerin use. At each visit, study medication was retrieved and new medication prescribed. Compliance was assessed by tablet count at each visit.

Statistical Analysis

The data for patients who completed the study were analyzed to compare the efficacy variables of the IS-5-MN treatment group with those of the placebo group after double-blind therapy. The data were rank-transformed and analyzed using an analysis of covariance. Adjustment was made for the corresponding morning pretherapy baseline, which was the exercise test done just before administration of the morning dose of single-blind placebo at visit 2. Statistical significance was judged at the 0.05 level (one-tailed). A two-tailed test was used to evaluate the zero-hour effect and rebound phenomenon.

Patients were randomly assigned to the sequence in which they received the exercise tests. Half of the patients received the morning stress tests after 1 week and the afternoon tests after 2 weeks. The other half of the patients received the tests in the reverse order. This sequence effect and treatment by sequence interaction effect were both examined to evaluate their effect on the treatment.

Efficacy Evaluations

The primary efficacy variable was total exercise duration (the time to moderately severe anginal pain that necessitated discontinuation of walking during the exercise stress test). During double-blind therapy, for patients who did not have moderate angina, total exercise time was substituted. The peak effect (the maximum exercise time at any hour) and the duration of effect were also determined.

Secondary efficacy variables included the magnitude of ST-segment depression, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure during stress testing, number of anginal attacks, and the number of nitroglycerin tablets consumed.

Assessment of Rebound Phenomenon and Zero-Hour Effect

Rebound was assessed by evaluating the secondary efficacy parameters, such as angina attacks and sublingual nitroglycerin consumption. The zero-hour effect was evaluated by comparing the hour 0 pretherapy stress test result at visit 2 with the hour 0 predose stress test result at visit 3 or 4. The change (visit-4 result minus visit-3 result) was also analyzed.

Safety Evaluations

Safety was assessed by a physical examination, clinical laboratory evaluations, and recordings of study events. Study events were any undesired signs or symptoms associated with the use of the study medications, regardless of whether these events were considered drug related.


Results
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
dotResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Of 136 patients who met the entry and exclusion criteria, 128 patients stopped exercise because of angina of moderate severity within 3 minutes 15 seconds and 10 minutes and received single-blind placebo. Six of the 128 patients did not stop exercise due to moderately severe angina consistently during subsequent tests and were dropped from the study. The remaining 122 patients entered the randomized, double-blind treatment phase. Of these 122 patients, 6 patients (2 in the placebo group and 4 in the IS-5-MN group) were withdrawn from the study. Data from 116 patients who completed the study (60 in the IS-5-MN group, 56 in the placebo group) are included in the efficacy analysis. Safety results were analyzed for all 122 patients enrolled.

The demographic characteristics of the 116 patients who completed the study are summarized in Table 1. The characteristics of patients assigned to the two treatment groups were similar. Compliance with study drug administration was 90% to 100% in 90% of the patients and was at least 75% in the remaining patients who completed the trial.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Baseline

 
Assessments of Efficacy

Figure 1 shows the mean changes from baseline in total exercise duration for both treatment groups. Compared with placebo, both the 0800-hour and the 1500-hour dose of IS-5-MN produced a greater increase in exercise duration that was statistically significant (P < 0.01) at all time intervals tested. Similarly, the peak effect was greater after both IS-5-MN doses compared with placebo (P < 0.01), occurring 2 hours after drug administration (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Total Exercise Duration at Baseline and after Double-blind Therapy with Placebo or 20 Milligrams of Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate*

 



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Change in exercise duration among patients receiving placebo and those receiving isosorbide-5-mononitrate therapy. Mean changes in total exercise duration from respective pretherapy baseline values after 0800-hour and 1500-hour doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) and placebo. Total exercise duration increased significantly (P < 0.01) with IS-5-MN compared with placebo at 2, 5, and 7 hours after the 0800-hour dose and at 2 and 5 hours after the 1500-hour dose (hours 9 and 12 after the 0800-hour dose). Exercise time before the 0800-hour dose did not change significantly. Mean values ±SE are shown by the vertical bars. *P < 0.01.

 
The zero-hour effect refers to a predose exercise stress test performance that has worsened from the pretherapy baseline in patients receiving long-term nitrate therapy compared with those receiving placebo. Compared with the pretherapy hour 0 stress test at visit 2, total exercise duration was greater during the predose hour 0 stress test at weeks 3 and 4 for both the placebo and IS-5-MN groups (Table 3). Exercise duration at week 4 was increased from that at week 3 in both treatment groups Table 3, but it was greater in the IS-5-MN group than in the placebo group. Therefore, no zero-hour effect was seen.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Assessment of Time-Zero Effect: Time to Moderately Severe Anginal Pain at Baseline and after Double-blind Therapy for 1 and 2 Weeks*

 

The exercise duration observed at 2 and 5 hours after the 1500-hour dose did not differ statistically from that after the 0800-hour dose in both treatment groups (Table 4; placebo compared with IS-5-MN, P > 0.2 at 2 hours and at 5 hours).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Assessment of Tolerance from Difference in Total Exercise Time between 0800-Hour and 1500-Hour Doses*

 
We did a post hoc analysis of the effect of ß- adrenergic blocker therapy on peak response. Exercise duration increased after IS-5-MN compared with placebo in patients on concomitant ß-blocker therapy (P < 0.05) and in those not taking ß-blockers (P < 0.01). Patients not receiving ß-blockers tended to have a greater response.

At baseline, ST-segment depression at termination of exercise was similar in the placebo and IS-5-MN groups (1.2 ±0.2 compared with 1.2 ±0.1 mm, P > 0.2), and these values did not change after 1 to 2 weeks of placebo or IS-5-MN therapy. At comparable work loads, however, ST-segment depression was less in the IS-5-MN group compared with placebo group but achieved statistical significance only at 2 hours after the afternoon dose (0.8 compared with 1.1 mm, P = 0.04). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure during exercise were similar in the placebo and IS-5-MN groups.

The IS-5-MN and placebo groups did not differ in anginal attack rates or nitroglycerin consumption for the whole 24-hour period or for the interval between 0200 and 0800 hours (Table 5). We also observed no difference between the treatment groups for patients without anginal attacks during the study; 13 patients in each group had no episodes of angina.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Anginal Attacks and Sublingual Nitroglycerin Tablet Consumption per Week

 

Assessment of Safety Results

In the IS-5-MN group, treatment was discontinued because of severe headaches, nausea or vomiting, or dizziness in two patients, unstable angina in one patient, and flu-like illness in one patient. In the placebo group, treatment was discontinued because of unstable angina in one patient and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during the visit-3 exercise test in one patient. Nine (15%) of 62 patients reported headache in the placebo group and 19 (32%) of 60 patients in the IS-5-MN group. No other study-related events were reported. No clinical or statistical increase in the rate of anginal attacks or in nitroglycerin consumption was noted during the 0200- to 0800-hour interval in the IS-5-MN group compared with the placebo group (Table 5).


Discussion
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
dotDiscussion
down arrowAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Our results show that IS-5-MN, 20 mg given once daily in the morning and again 7 hours later, resulted in a significantly improved exercise performance after both doses compared with placebo. We chose the 20-mg dose because it produced a near-maximum effect after a single oral dose [32] and after several doses during twice-daily therapy [33]. Further, it is the only dose approved in the United States. The dose-response relation of isosorbide dinitrate administered in a similar twice-daily schedule and its effect on exercise performance are unknown [28, 29]. When nitroglycerin patches delivering more than 30 mg of nitroglycerin per 24 hours were applied for only 12 hours during the day, exercise duration increased during long-term therapy for at least 8 hours [21]. In our study, comparable or superior results were obtained with twice-daily therapy with 20 mg of IS-5-MN, given in the morning and 7 hours later, which lasted for at least 12 hours as shown by the improvement in exercise performance.

Tolerance, defined as a decrease in magnitude and duration of effects despite constant or increased dose (plasma concentration), is a serious concern during long-term nitrate therapy [1, 2, 10, 11, 13]. A comparison of the effects of IS-5-MN after several doses with those of the first dose has already been done and showed that tolerance does not develop [33, 37]. This study focused on assessing tolerance by comparing efficacy after the morning and afternoon doses during long-term, intermittent nitrate therapy.

Although tolerance was avoided with the twice-daily regimen we used, an apparent diminution of effect occurred after the 1500-hour dose of IS-5-MN compared with the 0800-hour dose. However, a similar phenomenon was observed in the placebo group (highlighting the importance of using a parallel placebo group). Thus, no clinical evidence of loss of efficacy was observed after the 1500-hour dose of IS-5-MN compared with the 0800-hour dose (that is, no evidence of tolerance).

The incorporation of a nitrate-free interval to avoid tolerance has raised concerns that clinical manifestations of nitrate withdrawal may occur, possibly as a rebound increase in anginal attacks during nitrate-free intervals [11, 21]. Another possible manifestation of nitrate withdrawal during intermittent therapy is the zero-hour effect, which is a decreased exercise duration at the end of the nitrate-free interval before the morning dose of medication compared with placebo. Both phenomena have been observed with intermittent nitroglycerin-patch therapy [21]. We found no rebound increase in anginal attacks and no zero-hour effect in the IS-5-MN group compared with the placebo group. The absence of these phenomena may result because plasma concentrations of nitrates should decrease more gradually after the last oral dose of the day than after nitroglycerin-patch removal. However, many patients in our study did not have angina during daily activities even though they all had angina during treadmill exercise. Thus, whether patients who have frequent episodes of angina during daily activity will have a rebound increase in frequency during periods of low plasma nitrate levels at night cannot be assessed from these results. If this is of concern in specific patients, additional therapy with another class of antianginal agent, preferably a long-acting ß-blocker or a long-acting calcium antagonist might be instituted [15].

Our eligibility requirements did not include episodes of angina associated with daily activity during single-blind placebo therapy as long as patients stopped treadmill exercise because of angina of moderate severity. The median values for anginal attacks per week did not change during either double-blind placebo or IS-5-MN treatment (Table 5). Such increases in exercise duration during double-blind placebo administration compared with baseline values during single-blind placebo administration have been well documented in similar parallel-group studies [9].

Unlike many previous investigations [8, 9, 17, 18], in which only nitrate responders were studied, we did not address initial nitrate responsiveness. Thus, our results are applicable to a broader population of patients with stable exercise-induced angina pectoris, without the need of determining responsiveness to sublingual nitroglycerin.

This study shows that pharmacologic tolerance to nitrates can be avoided by using IS-5-MN, 20 mg twice a day, once in the morning and again 7 hours later. The drug can be safely and effectively used either with or without concomitant ß-blocker therapy. Similar studies with isosorbide dinitrate and other long-acting oral nitrates are required to see if tolerance can be avoided with these agents. Further studies are also needed before recommending concomitant use of IS-5-MN and calcium channel blockers.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Queen Elizabeth Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. University of California, Sacramento, California. Wilford Hall, USAF Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. Center for Stress Studies of San Diego, San Diego, California. Taylor Hospital, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania. Clinical Physiology Associates, Fort Myers, Florida. Escondido Cardiology, Escondido, California. The Jackson Clinic, Madison, Wisconsin.
Requests for Reprints: Udho Thadani, MBBS, Cardiology Section, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton Young Boulevard, 5SP-300, Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Mr. Wes Pierson of A. H. Robins Company for organizing the study, supplying the study medication, which is manufactured by Boehringer Mannheim, and monitoring the study. These data were collected from individual centers by A. H. Robin's monitors, and statistical analysis of the data was done by Mr. Robert Herbertson of A. H. Robins. The data were also independently interpreted by the principal investigators of the study. The authors also thank Ms. Linda Turner for preparation of the manuscript.
Grant Support: By a grant from A. H. Robins Company.


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Thadani U. Current status of nitrates in angina pectoris. Mod Conc Cardiovas Dis. 1987; 56:49-54.

2. Parker JO. Nitrate therapy in stable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316:1635-42.

3. Thadani U, Fung HL, Darke AC, Parker JO. Oral isosorbide dinitrate in angina pectoris: comparison of duration of action and dose-response relation during acute and sustained therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 49:411-9.

4. Crean PA, Ribeiro P, Crea F, Davies GJ, Ratcliffe D, Maseri A. Failure of transdermal nitroglycerin to improve chronic stable angina: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double crossover trial. Am Heart J. 1984; 1494-1500.

5. Reichek N, Priest C, Zimrin D, Chandler T, Sutton MS. Antianginal effects of nitroglycerin patches. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54:1-7.

6. Parker JO, Fung HL. Transdermal nitroglycerin in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54:471-6.

7. James MA, Walker PR, Papouchado M, Wilkinson PR. Efficacy of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris. Br Heart J. 1985; 53:631-5.

8. Thadani U, Hamilton SF, Olson E, Anderson J, Voyles W, Prasad R, et al. Transdermal nitroglycerin patches in angina pectoris. Dose titration, duration of effect, and rapid tolerance. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105:485-92.

9. Steering Committee, Transdermal Nitrate Cooperative Study. Acute and chronic antianginal efficacy of continuous twenty-four-hour application of transdermal nitroglycerin. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68:1263-73.[Medline]

10. Abrams J. Tolerance to organic nitrates. Circulation. 1986; 74: 1181-5.

11. Thadani U, Whitsett T, Hamilton SF. Nitrate therapy for myocardial ischemic syndrome: current perspectives including tolerance. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1988; 13:731-84.

12. Flaherty JT. Nitrate tolerance. A review of the evidence. Drugs. 1989; 37:523-50.

13. Abrams J. A reappraisal of nitrate therapy. JAMA. 1988; 259:396-401.

14. Zimrin D, Reichek N, Bogin KT, Aurigemma G, Douglas P, Berko B, et al. Antianginal effects of intravenous nitroglycerin over 24 hours. Circulation. 1988; 77:1376-84.

15. Thadani U. Role of nitrates in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70(Suppl):43B-53B.

16. Thadani U, Manyari D, Parker JO, Fung HL. Tolerance to the circulatory effects of oral isosorbide dinitrate. Rate of development and cross-tolerance to glyceryl trinitrate. Circulation. 1980; 61:526-35.

17. Rudolph W, Blasini R, Reinger G, Brugmann U. Tolerance development during isosorbide dinitrate treatment: can it be circumvented? Z Kardiol. 1983; 72(Suppl 3):195-8.

18. Parker JO, Farrell B, Lahey KA, Moe G. Effect of interval between doses on the development of tolerance to isosorbide dinitrate. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316:1440-4.

19. Cowan C, Bourke J, Reid DS, Julian DG. Tolerance to glyceryl nitrate patches: prevention by intermittent dosing. Br Med J. 1987; 294:544-5.

20. Schaer DH, Buff LA, Katz RJ. Sustained antianginal efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin patches using an overnight 10-hour nitrate-free interval. Am J Cardiol. 1988; 61:46-50.

21. Demots H, Glasser SP. Intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin therapy in the treatment of stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 786-95.

22. Silber S, Vogler AC, Krause KH, Vogel M, Theisen K. Induction and circumvention of nitrate tolerance applying different dosage intervals. Am J Med. 1987; 83:860-70.

23. Thadani U, Whitsett TL. Nitrate therapy: continuous or pulse dosing. Ration Drug Ther. 1987; 21:1-6.

24. Abrams J. Interval therapy to avoid tolerance: paradise regained? Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64:931-4.

25. Waters DD, Juneau M, Gossard D, Choquett G, Brien M. Limited usefulness of intermittent nitroglycerin patches in angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13:421-5.

26. Bassan MM. The daylong pattern of the antianginal effects of long-term three times daily administered isosorbide dinitrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 16:936-40.

27. Fox KM, Dargie HJ, Deanfield J, Maseri A. Avoidance of tolerance and lack of rebound with intermittent dose titrated transdermal glyceryl trinitrate. The Transderm Nitrate Investigators. Br Heart J. 1991; 66:151-5.

28. Thadani U. The problem of nitrate tolerance. How can it be overcome? Journal of Myocardial Ischemia. 1990; 2:13-30.

29. Thadani U. Avoidance of nitrate tolerance. Postgrad Med. 1992; 91: 307-12, 315-8.

30. Abshagen U. Overview of the pharmacokinetics of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. In: Julian DG, Rittinghausen R, Uberbacher HJ; eds. Mononitrate II. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987:28-36.

31. Taylor T, Chasseaud LF, Major R, Doyle E, Darragh A. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate pharmacokinetics in humans. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1981; 2:255-63.

32. Thadani U, Prasad R, Hamilton SF, Voyles WF, Doyle R, Karpow SA, et al. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate in angina pectoris: plasma concentrations and duration of effects after acute therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987; 42:58-65.

33. Jones JP. Dose response of isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with angina pectoris. The Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate Study Cooperative (Abstract). Second International Symposium on Mononitrates, Berlin, December 1986.

34. Tauchert M, Jansen W, Osterspey A, Fuchs M, Homback V, Hilger HH. Dose dependence of tolerance during treatment with mononitrates. Z Kardiol. 1983; 72(Suppl 3):218-28.

35. Kohli RS, Rodrigues EA, Kardash MM, Whittington JR, Raftery EB. Acute and sustained effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 58:727-31.

36. Thadani U, Prasad R, Hamilton SF, Voyles W, Doyle R, Karpow S, et al. Usefulness of twice-daily isosorbide-5-mononitrate in preventing development of tolerance in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60:477-82.

37. Thadani U, Friedman R, Jones JP, Herbertson RK, Pierson WC. Nitrate tolerance: eccentric versus concentric twice-daily therapy with isosorbide-5-mononitrate in angina pectoris (Abstract). Circulation. 1989; 80(Suppl 2)II-216.

38. Bruce RA, Hornsten TR. Exercise stress testing in evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. -Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1969; 11:371-5.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Muller, U. Laber, J. Mullenheim, W. Meyer, and G. Kojda
Preserved endothelial function after long-term eccentric isosorbide mononitrate despite moderate nitrate tolerance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 1994 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. O. Parker, J. D. Parker, R. W. Caldwell, B. Farrell, and W. H. Kaesemeyer
The effect of supplemental L-arginine on tolerance development during continuous transdermal nitroglycerin therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1199 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Eccles, N. Rousseau, P. Adams, and L. Thomas
Evidence-based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2001; 18(2): 217 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. H. Zwinderman, T. J. Cleophas, H. van der Sluijs, M. G. Niemeyer, B. P. Buunk, E. E. van der Wall, T. J. Cleophas, and Dutch Mononitrate Quality of Life Study Group
Comparison of 50-mg and 100-mg Sustained-Release Isosorbide Mononitrate in the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris: Effects on Quality-of-Life Indices
Angiology, December 1, 1999; 50(12): 963 - 969.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J. E Grunwald, A. Iannaccone, and J. DuPont
Effect of isosorbide mononitrate on the human optic nerve and choroidal circulations
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 1999; 83(2): 162 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. D. Parker and J. O. Parker
Nitrate Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris
N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 1998; 338(8): 520 - 531.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
North of England Stable Angina Guideline Developme
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina
BMJ, March 30, 1996; 312(7034): 827 - 832.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
ISOSORBIDE-5-MONONITRATE FOR STABLE ANGINA
Journal Watch (General), March 15, 1994; 1994(315): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Abstract of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Articles citing this article
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Thadani, U.
space
  arrow  Hinderaker, P. H.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online