Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Stamm, W. E.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

REPLY

Sensitivity, Specificity, Prevalence, and Disease Stage

right arrow Walter E. Stamm, MD

15 February 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 4 | Page 345


IN RESPONSE:

I appreciate Dr. Redd's comment and agree that, in a statistical sense, neither sensitivity nor specificity should vary with disease prevalence. However, with chlamydial infection (and others as well), biologic factors may influence the sensitivity and specificity of the test in populations having different prevalences [1, 2]. For example, in patients infected with chlamydia who have recently acquired infection (usually seen in populations with a high prevalence), the number of organisms (and amount of antigen or DNA) present is greater than in populations characterized by low prevalence. In the latter populations, more infections are long-lived, are subacute, and characterized by fewer chlamydial organisms. Hence, test performance will change because infections will be more difficult to detect in a population composed largely of patients harboring fewer organisms.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Harborview Medical Center; Seattle, WA 98104


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Barnes RC, Katz BP, Rolfs RT, Batteiger B, Caine V, Jones RB. Quantitative culture of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990; 28:774-80.

2. Schachter J, Stamm WE, Chernesky MA, Hook EW, Jones RB, Judson FN, et al. Nonculture tests for genital tract chlamydial infections. What does the package insert mean, and will it mean the same thing tomorrow? Sex Trans Dis. 1992; 29:243-4.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Stamm, W. E.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online