Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Kapusta, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Reforming Workers' Compensation

right arrow Morton A. Kapusta, MD

15 June 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 12 | Pages 1051-1052


TO THE EDITOR:

Dr. Hadler's trenchant comment [1] points out that the conventional nature of the workers' compensation process in the United States may be partially responsible for promoting and prolonging a claimant's musculoskeletal symptoms and disability and he proposes a "no-fault" compensation scheme.

However, workers' compensation cases are just as difficult in Quebec, despite a large and generous social safety net that includes universal medical coverage, a workers compensation scheme, and social welfare benefits for disabling personal medical illness. Despite this essentially no-fault system, I have seen voluminous compensation files for musculoskeletal complaints extending over many years. These files contain opinions from different treating physicians and multiple experts, as well as adjudication hearings and appeals. This strongly suggests that the compensation problem is not due to a system that rewards fault-finding alone.

In Dr. Hadler's more detailed analysis of musculoskeletal compensation problems, published elsewhere [2, 3], he describes a situation wherein symptoms, without any significant organic pathophysiologic abnormalities, are claimed to be the result of either single or multiple injuries. Often, physicians face the predicament of a lack of valid diagnostic criteria, modalities of treatment, or an objective means to quantify disability. The claimant's predicament derives from confusion about conflicting medical diagnoses, impatience with the lack of response to "treatment," and fear of having to repeatedly validate one's "injury" to the compensation system.

Part of the solution is implied in Dr. Hadler's analysis. The predicament arises largely from a physician's inability to diagnose, treat, or evaluate musculoskeletal disability, in the absence of significant organic pathophysiologic abnormalities. A means must be devised to identify particular individuals early and efficiently. Once identified, these persons should be promptly extricated from the compensation process, which for them is likely to be long and damaging.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowReferences

Montreal, Quebec H3S 2TD; Canada


References
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotReferences

1. Hadler NM. The injured worker and the internist (Editorial). Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:163-4.

2. Hadler NM, ed. Clinical Concepts in Regional Musculoskeletal Illness. Orlando, Florida: Grune & Stratton, Inc; 1987:3-370.

3. Hadler NM. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders. New York: Raven Press; 1993:1-273.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Kapusta, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online