Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Lawrence, C.
space
  arrow  Furgiuele, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

The Missing Macroglobulin

right arrow Christine Lawrence and Joseph Furgiuele

1 November 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 9 | Page 954


We recently had a patient with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia whose diagnosis was delayed because the automated blood analyzer did not detect the macroglobulin.

A 49-year-old man had experienced epistaxis, dyspnea, and weakness for several months. His sclerae were icteric and pale, and he had retinal hemorrhages as well as marked tortuosity and dilatation of the retinal veins. The liver and spleen were not palpable and he had no peripheral lymphadenopathy.

A peripheral smear showed marked erythrocyte rouleaux and plasmacytoid lymphocytes. Serum protein electrophoresis showed a striking {gamma} spike Figure 1, and immunofixation electrophoresis showed a monoclonal IgM- {kappa}. His bone marrow was replaced with mature and plasmacytoid lymphocytes. Serum viscosity was 8.3 (normal, <2.0). The Sia test result was strongly positive and the precipitate plummeted to the bottom of the tube; this finding was described by Waldenstrom [1] as typical of an IgM euglobulin. Electrophoresis of the water-diluted serum showed that the paraprotein was missing because the euglobulin had precipitated (Figure 1). Electrophoresis of the serum euglobulin precipitate showed that it was the monoclonal IgM (Figure 1).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Electrophoretic patterns of proteins in whole serum, supernatant of water-precipitated serum, and euglobulin precipitate at a dilution of 1:5.0 with distilled water.

 

Using the Miles-Technicon Dax 48 (Miles, Inc., West Haven, Connecticut), the chemistry laboratory reported his total serum protein concentration as 1.2, 1.7, and 0.6 g/dL, respectively, on the first 3 days after admission, whereas we obtained a refractometric estimate of 11.3 g/dL. The manufacturer recommended distilled water as the blank reagent to determine the total serum protein concentration. When the patient's serum was added to the water blank reagent, a heavy white precipitate formed, causing most of the total protein to be obscured. After we brought this problem to the attention of the manufacturer, they changed their recommendation to using 0.9% saline as the blank reagent for the total protein concentration.

However, even after we made that change, the Dax 48 showed a total protein concentration of 5.2 g/dL, whereas the refractometric estimate was 11.1 g/dL. This continuing problem was caused by the initial dilution of all serum specimens to 1:2.5 with distilled water. If the total protein exceeds 10 g/dL (or if the concentration of another analyte is abnormally high), then, according to the manufacturer, the serum must be further diluted to 1:5.0 with distilled water. At this dilution rate, most of the euglobulin precipitated (Figure 1). Therefore, the Miles-Technicon Dax 48 provides a falsely low estimate of serum total protein concentration if the specimen has a high concentration of protein, some of which is a water-insoluble euglobulin.


REFERENCE
space
up arrowTop
dotREFERENCE

1. Waldenstrom J. Incipient myelomatosis or essential hyperglobulinemia with fibrinogenopenia—a new syndrome? Acta Medica Scandinavia. 1944; 117:216-38.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Lawrence, C.
space
  arrow  Furgiuele, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online