LETTER
What Is Internal Medicine?
William H. Fee Jr.
15 September 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 6 | Pages 541-542
TO THE EDITOR:
In his forthright review of internal medicine today, Dr. LaCombe [1] decries the fragmenting effects of subspecialization on patient care and the associated reimbursement inequities. His own general internist group in rural Maine obtained extra training, and they do procedures that ordinarily are done by subspecialists. This expanded version of general internal medicine will be resisted in urban and suburban areas where fully trained subspecialists are present in adequate, or excess, supply.
Now that traditional general internists are an endangered species, their unique ability to provide quality care and contain costs for complex patients has been rediscovered. Their prestige among their peers and health planners remains high, but little has been done to increase incentives and reimbursements for them. It is time for change.
1. LaCombe M. What is internal medicine? Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 384-7.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.