Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 September 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 6 | Pages 537-538
I am not convinced by Stenman and colleagues [1] that there is no benefit in increasing the dose of glipizide. Although blood glucose concentrations for the three treatment groups are not statistically different, the average daily blood glucose level is inversely proportional to the glipizide dose: 171 mg/dL for the group receiving 10 mg/d, 166 mg/dL for the group receiving 20 mg/d, and 160 mg/dL for the group receiving 40 mg/d. The mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values for the treatment groups are also not statistically different, but they may lack the sensitivity to detect small but statistically significant changes in blood glucose.
The authors do not specify on which days the twice-weekly home glucose measurements were obtained. If the measurements were discretionary, this may be a confounding factor in that patients may have recorded their sugars when most compliant. Moreover, because blood sugars were self-monitored, patients were aware of any difference in their glycemic control and may have altered their diet accordingly. Interestingly, some patients had normal baseline HbA1c values yet experienced no hypoglycemia while receiving maximal doses of glipizide for 3 months.
The authors conclude that ß-cell function decreases in patients receiving higher doses of glipizide by measuring serum insulin levels after a test meal. However, enhancement of insulin secretion by sulfonylureas varies inversely with the underlying glucose concentration. Thus, if the baseline glucose level is lower, less insulin secretion by the ß-cells would be expected for a given glucose challenge.
Finally, the study group was small and heterogeneous and, according to the authors, individual responses to glipizide differed markedly. Given these issues, it might have been more useful to present the outcomes for all patients individually. Because results were presented as a group average, significant responses in some patients may have been diminished when combined with those patients who did not benefit from an increased glipizide dose.
1. Stenman S, Melander A, Groop PH, Groop LC. What is the benefit of increasing the sulfonylurea dose? Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118:169-72. About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
LETTER
The Benefit of Increasing Sulfonylurea Dose
TO THE EDITOR:
REFERENCE
![]()
Top
REFERENCE
![]()
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Sheehan Current Therapeutic Options in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Practical Approach Clin. Med. Res., July 1, 2003; 1(3): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||