Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Southwick, F. S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REPLY

More To Learn from Mary's Story

right arrow Frederick S. Southwick

1 September 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 5 | Page 442


IN RESPONSE:

What did Mary have? In the original version of my article [1], the probable diagnosis was included. Mary began taking penicillin 5 days before the onset of her mononeuritis. After the onset of pain, she discontinued penicillin, but unbeknownst to me, restarted it 2 days later. This strong antigenic stimulus may have induced a vasculitis and marked eosinophilia. Eosinophils can lead to a hypercoagulable state, which may have explained her venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli. Biopsies of the skin lesions as well as a sural nerve biopsy were done after she had stabilized in the intensive care unit. Unfortunately, these biopsies were late and followed steroid therapy. The pathology was consistent with, but not diagnostic of, a vasculitis. On discontinuing steroids, Mary had no recurrence of eosinophilia or vasculitis. The most likely diagnosis is self-limited, penicillin-induced vasculitis. I agree with Dr. Pierach that doctors should not treat family members. I included these details to illustrate this important point. My purpose was not to assign blame (aren't we all to blame?) but rather to illustrate in personal terms the consequences of laissez-faire medicine.

Dr. Stemp's and Dr. Blumberg's letters are like the 80 personal letters I received from physicians in the past 2 months. Many complain of feeling like outcasts and claim to be looked on as "bizarre" for being concerned about their patients. Others have described discouraging personal experiences with ill family members in academic medical centers. Mary's case illustrates that attitude, not aptitude, often determines whether a patient receives excellent clinical care.

How do we reward and retain the outstanding clinician in our academic medical centers? Perhaps the promotion database should include a series of peer-reviewed patient charts in addition to a list of peer-reviewed articles, as well as letters from former patients and referring physicians, not just from academicians. Evaluations of clinical expertise by residents and fellow academic physicians might be scored in a similar fashion to the teaching evaluations provided by medical students. Mary's case has struck a raw nerve. Everyone agrees that there is a problem. Now we must all work together to forge a realistic and constructive solution.


Author and Article Information
space
up arrowTop
dotAuthor & Article Info
down arrowREFERENCE

From University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0277.


REFERENCE
space
up arrowTop
up arrowAuthor & Article Info
dotREFERENCE

1. Southwick F. Who was caring for Mary? Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 146-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Southwick, F. S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online