LETTER
Treatment of Nongonococcal Urethritis
Louis J. Papa
15 December 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 12 | Page 1226
TO THE EDITOR:
The study by Romanowski and associates [1] regarding the efficacy of minocycline in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis and mucopurulent cervicitis leaves me confused. Their results appear to support the hypothesis that minocycline is as effective as doxycycline, but it seems a bit premature to suggest that their findings "support the administration of minocycline 100 mg as a single nightly dose" over doxycycline [1].
The crux of their recommendation may be based on improved compliance. This factor was not evaluated in their study. Their recommendation may be based on the fewer side effects seen with minocycline. However, side effects were specifically elicited, and, although a grading system was used to measure their severity, this system was not applied when comparing the minocycline and doxycycline groups.
I raise these issues because the cost of minocycline is as much as 10 times greater than that of doxycycline, even for once-daily dosing. This cost represents only the acquisition cost for the pharmacist. Very often, cost is overlooked when considering compliance, especially for the population most at risk for nongonococcal urethritis and mucopurulent cervicitis. It is the age group studied in this article that is most likely to be uninsured and to incur the added cost directly out of pocket [2].
1. Romanowski B, Talbot H, Stadnyk M, Kowalchuk P, Bowie WR. Minocycline compared with doxycycline in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis and mucopurulent cervicitis. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119:16-22.
2. Friedman E. The uninsured. JAMA. 1991; 265:2; 491-5.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.