LETTER
Osteopathy, Chiropractic, and Spinal Manipulation
David S. Abend
15 April 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 8 | Pages 651-653
TO THE EDITOR:
Shekelle and colleagues [1] under-represented the important contributions to spinal manipulation by the osteopathic medical profession. There are many osteopaths in the United States who use osteopathic manipulative treatment effectively in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. The data and methods in the review were heavily biased in favor of chiropractic care, omitting many important publications by and including osteopathic physicians [2-5]. Ironically, Andrew Taylor Still, MD, the founder of osteopathic medicine, discovered osteopathic manipulation and its holistic medical approach almost 20 years (1874) before chiropractic was discovered (1895), and D. D. Palmer, the founder of chiropractic, was one of his pupils.
Shekelle and coworkers' article [1] did not mention any osteopathic physicians included among the "specialists." According to their Methods section, Index Medicus and MEDLINE searches did not use the MeSH terms "osteopathic" or "osteopathic manipulation." Using my affiliated hospital's library, I did a MEDLINE search from 1966 to the present, and, after evaluating the bibliographies, I retrieved at least 65 articles and pieces of correspondence that were relevant to the topic of spinal manipulation from an osteopathic, allopathic, and chiropractic perspective.
Osteopaths who are experienced in the area of chronic low-back pain use accepted medical regimens that include appropriate pharmacologic agents, physical therapy, ice and heat, rest, and gradual exercise and stretching to improve mobility. They combine this with injection therapy, spray and stretch mobilization, and specific types of soft-tissue, myofascial, and high-velocity, low-amplitude osteopathic manipulative adjustments and techniques. Using spinal manipulation in such a well rounded and carefully orchestrated manner can be an asset even to MDs.
Although spinal manipulation is controversial, given the popularity of both the chiropractic and osteopathic professions over the last century, perhaps a joint collaboration among osteopaths and chiropractors would be of great benefit to the medical and lay public.
1. Shekelle PG, Adams AH, Chassin MR, Hurwitz EL, Brook RH. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:590-8.
2. Bourdillon JF, Day EA. Spinal Manipulation. 4th edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1987.
3. Cantu RI, Grodin AJ. Myofascial Manipulation: Theory and Clinical Approach. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1992.
4. DiGiovanna EL, Schiowitz S. An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1991.
5. McMennell J. The Musculoskeletal System. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers; 1992.
About Letters
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.