Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Furlow, T. C.
space
  arrow  Dougherty, M. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Bacteria on the Common Communion Cup

right arrow Terrance C. Furlow and Mark J. Dougherty

1 April 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 7 | Pages 572-573


TO THE EDITOR:

Although many church denominations have begun using individual cups for each communicant, some continue to use a common cup. To our knowledge, this study is the first to show the presence of viable, pathogenic bacteria on the common cup after a Eucharistic service.

An urban, family-oriented parish with approximately 250 communicants was studied. Eight Eucharistic services were randomly selected between December 1990 and April 1991. Each cup was cultured 10 minutes after the Eucharistic service, although cups were not always cultured before the service. The entire rim of each cup was swabbed with a sterile cotton applicator previously moistened with transport media. Cups were chosen randomly for either bacterial culture or herpes simplex virus culture. Cultures were taken in the sacristy to avoid interruption of parish activities.

Of 16 cups cultured for bacteria after the service, 3 grew Staphylococcus aureus, 3 grew Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 1 grew both organisms, and 1 grew both organisms plus Branhamella catarrhalis. Four cups showed only normal flora, including {alpha}-hemolytic streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids, nonhemolytic streptococci, and lactobacilli. One of nine cups cultured for bacteria before the service showed S. aureus; one showed coagulase-negative staphylococcus; and seven had no growth. Four of seven cultures taken from silver cups and four of nine cultures taken from pottery cups after the Eucharist were positive for pathogenic bacteria. All three cups cultured for herpes simplex virus were negative.

This study shows that pathogenic bacteria may be spread among communicants during a Eucharistic service. Previous studies have shown similar pathogens on the common cup when passed among "healthy" volunteers in a simulated service [1]. Studies have also shown that rotating the cup and wiping with a "purificator" are not effective in eliminating bacteria from the common cup [1-3]. This and previous studies show that the silver cup has no significant antibacterial properties in the setting of a Eucharistic service.

Two cups that were cultured before the service grew bacteria, one that was pathogenic. This finding reinforces the need for hygienic cleaning procedures between services.

Intinction, the act of dipping bread into wine before ingestion by the communicant, has been offered as a safer means of taking the Eucharist. One recent review article notes that this method could result in the transmission of saliva between communicants [4].

Our current understanding of communicable diseases suggests that the safest method for communicants is to use clean, individual cups [3, 5].


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Gregory KF, Carpenter JA, Bending GC. Infection hazards of the common communion cup. Can J Public Health. 1967; 58:305-10.

2. Burrows W, Hemmons ES. Survival of bacteria on the silver communion cup. J Infect Dis. 1943; 73:180-90.

3. Hobbs BC, Knowlden JA, White A. Experiments on the communion cup. J Hyg (Camb). 1967; 65:37-48.

4. Gill ON. The hazard of infection from the shared communion cup. J Infect. 1988; 16:3-23.

5. Dancewicz EP. What is the risk of infection from common communion cups? JAMA. 1973; 225:320.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Furlow, T. C.
space
  arrow  Dougherty, M. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online