Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 February 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 4 | Pages 318-319
The Felty syndrome is the triad of rheumatoid arthritis, splenomegaly, and neutropenia. The use of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rGM-CSF) in patients with the Felty syndrome has yielded variable results [1, 2]. This is the second reported application of rG-CSF in a patient with the Felty syndrome [3].
A 51-year-old white man with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis and absolute neutrophil counts ranging from 0.055 to 0.2 x 109/L for 10 years was referred for frequent sinopulmonary and skin infections. Examination showed splenomegaly and stigmata of rheumatoid arthritis; bone marrow examination was hypercellular with a left-shifted myeloid line consistent with the Felty syndrome. Oral methotrexate, 2.5 mg, was given thrice weekly for 2 months without effect and was discontinued.
Recombinant G-CSF was begun at 5 µg/kg per day subcutaneously and was later increased to 10 µg/kg per day. Hemoglobin and platelets fell during the next 3 weeks, and G-CSF was stopped (Figure 1). Direct Coombs test, antiplatelet antibodies, and serial stool guaiacs were negative; lactate dehydrogenase and indirect bilirubin values were normal. Craniocaudal spleen span was 17.3 cm by ultrasound, without evidence of a bleed or infarct. A repeat ultrasound on day 60 showed a spleen span of 13.9 cm, and bone marrow was unchanged. LETTER
The Felty Syndrome and G-CSF-Associated Thrombocytopenia and Severe Anemia
TO THE EDITOR:
|
The optimal treatment of symptomatic Felty syndrome is undefined. The use of rGM-CSF, although leading to increased neutrophils, has been associated with an arthritic flare [2]. A patient treated with G-CSF had a significant increase in neutrophils while receiving 5 µg/kg per day [3]; however, an allergic skin reaction required discontinuation of the drug. Our patient showed no evidence of bleeding, hemolysis, or autoimmune consumption. Treatment with rG-CSF has not been shown to affect erythroid cells [4]. A transient and less striking thrombocytopenia has been reported with rG-CSF [5] but at doses higher than those used here. Acute splenic sequestration was possible, given the apparent transient increase in the size of the spleen. A "steal" phenomenon might have occurred with increased myeloid progenitors at the expense of erythroid and megakaryocytic elements.
Resolution of the cytopenias after discontinuation of rG-CSF suggests a causative role. Caution is warranted in the use of rG-CSF in patients with the Felty syndrome.
References
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Joseph G, Neustadt DH, Hamm J, Kellihan M, Hadley T. GM-CSF in the treatment of Felty syndrome. Am J Hematol. 1991; 37:55-6.
2. Hazenberg BPC, Van Leeuwen MA, Van Rijswijk MH, Stern AC, Vallenga E. Correction of granulocytopenia in Felty's syndrome by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Simultaneous induction of interleukin-6 release and flare-up of the arthritis (Letter). Blood. 1989; 74:2769-70.
3. Ito T, Miyairi Y, Kuwabara T, Dan K, Nomura T. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor corrects the granulocytopenia of Felty's syndrome (Letter). Am J Hematol. 1992; 41:318-9.
4. Lieschke GJ, Burgess AW. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327:28-35.
5. Lindemann A, Herrmann F, Oster W, Haffner G, Meyenburg W, Souza LM, et al. Hematologic effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with malignancy. Blood. 1989; 74:2644-51.
About Letters
|
|
The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:
Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references
Type with double-spacing
Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.
Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.
Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||