Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Stolley, P. D.
space
  arrow  Lasky, T.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

The Bellman Always Rings Thrice

right arrow Paul D. Stolley and Tamar Lasky

15 January 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 2 | Page 158


"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:

What I tell you three times is true"

—The Bellman in The Hunting of the Snark

by Lewis Carroll

It is tempting to think that if we repeat something often enough or we repeat what others have said it will become true. Skrabanek and McCormick named this phenomenon the Bellman's fallacy in their book Follies and Fallacies in Medicine [1].

An example of this fallacy came to our attention in a recent review of the literature regarding asthma in children. In discussing explanations for the worldwide epidemic of asthma mortality in the 1960s, the author cited a previous publication [2] as follows:

"... undertreatment rather than overtreatment has repeatedly been indicated as the probable cause of the ‘epidemic’ of deaths that occurred in the United Kingdom in the 1960s."

The source of the quotation, a 1988 editorial, cited a previous review [3]:

"It is now generally accepted that excessive bronchodilator aerosol use in association with death from asthma is not a cause of death but a reflection of the need for more effective therapy".

and cited an editorial in The Lancet in 1979 [4]. "There is a growing realization that pressurized aerosols were probably not the main culprit, although excessive use of isoprenaline, as opposed to other constituents of pressurized aerosols, may have been an important contributory factor".

The 1979 editorial actually acknowledged the contributory role of isoprenaline in asthma mortality in the 1960s and discussed other hypotheses of interest [5]. Thus, the original reference presented evidence that contradicted the conclusion reached by subsequent editorialists. Once, twice, thrice, authors cited previous authors.

During the years that these sweeping statements were made (1979-1992), researchers presented data showing an association between bronchodilators (high-dose, nonselective ß agonists in particular) and the epidemics of asthma mortality. The data were collected using various study designs (ecologic and case–control studies), in different countries (Britain and New Zealand), in the general population, and in hospital-based populations. The sharp increase in deaths occurred only in the countries that licensed the high-dose, nonselective bronchodilators and ceased when these drugs were removed from the market. No evidence exists to support the unlikely speculation that sudden failure to treat asthma with steroids initiated the epidemic of asthma-related mortality occurring in only certain countries during the 1960s; it was coincident with the introduction of high-potency, nonselective ß agonists available in hand-held nebulizers.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. Skrabanek P, McCormick J. Follies and Fallacies in Medicine. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books; 1990.

2. Larsen GL. Asthma in children. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326:1540-5.

3. Buist AS. Is asthma mortality increasing? Chest. 1988; 93:449-50.

4. Benatar SR. Fatal asthma. Lancet. 1986; 314:423-9.

5. Fatal asthma (Editorial). Lancet. 1979; 2:337-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Stolley, P. D.
space
  arrow  Lasky, T.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online