Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Thacker, H. L.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

Call Us Principal Physicians

right arrow Holly L. Thacker

15 June 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 12 | Pages 988-989


TO THE EDITOR:

Dr. Kerr White coined the term "primary care" a few decades ago to reflect the type of practice of most generalist physicians [1]. A recent American College of Physicians position paper [2] calls for a goal of at least 50% generalists from current internal medicine residency graduates. One reason for the current lack of generalists is the low prestige of the generalist. Why not change the name from "primary care physician" to "principal physician"?

"Primary" is defined as "first in order of time or development," for example, "primitive," as in stage of civilization. "Primary" colors are the basic but somewhat boring red, yellow, and blue. Thus, the word primary both denotes and connotes something basic and unsophisticated. Generalist physicians certainly deal with basic and mundane medical problems; general internists, however, also deal with complex, multifactorial medical problems, ethical issues. They also coordinate an increasingly complex medical environment. The generalist's professional life would be better described by the vivid colors of chartreuse, fuchsia, or cerulean blue.

The word primary also denotes "principal," as in first in rank and importance. A principal investigator is someone quite important and influential. The primary or principal physician is the most important physician in the health care system.

The term general internist is redundant. An internist by nature and training should be broad based in skills. Frequently, the qualifier "just" is applied as in "just a general internist". In actuality, it is many of the subspecialists who are limited in practice and scope of expertise. The term specialist is used to connote subspecialist, whereas the term generalist implies lack of specialty. Principal internists are specialists, not simply general practitioners; nor are they the same as another group of specialists, family medicine physicians [3].

Most aspiring young physicians in training desire to be "special" and, not surprisingly, want to be "specialists". Patients also want someone "special". Internists who limit their practice to a traditional subspecialty should be called subspecialists, with a narrower, albeit more detailed, expertise with certain medical problems and with high-tech procedures. We can promote and revitalize our great field by using more appropriate terms to describe our practice.


References
space
up arrowTop
dotReferences

1. White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg B. Ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961; 265:885-92.

2. Federated Council for Internal Medicine. General internal medicine and general internists: recognizing a national need. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:778-9.

3. Lipkin M Jr, Levinson W, Barker R, Kern DK, Burke W, Noble J, et al. Primary care internal medicine: a challenging career choice for the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112:371-8.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Thacker, H. L.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online