Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Weintraub, M.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

REPLY

Changing Over-the-Counter Drugs While Retaining the Brand Name

right arrow Michael Weintraub

15 June 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 12 | Page 988


The letter was referred to both the FDA and the manufacturer for their response.

IN RESPONSE:

In 1972, the FDA began a review of over-the-counter drug products to assure their safety and effectiveness for the intended uses. As a result, many reformulations and relabelings of over-the-counter drug products were anticipated, and the agency said that it would not take legal action against over-the-counter drugs if the changes in the formulation or labeling would increase effectiveness without decreasing safety, or vice versa.

In the Federal Register of 27 March 1974 (39 FR 11298), the agency published proposed regulations that required deletion of a trade name where there had been a fundamental change in the indications for use or active ingredients of the drug product. However, that proposal was never finalized, and the agency announced withdrawal of the proposal in the Federal Register of 30 December 1991 (56 FR 67440).

The FDA is aware that manufacturers use the same trade name on reformulated products. The accepted industry procedure is to indicate in the product's labeling that a significant change has occurred, which the manufacturer has done with the new Anusol product.

Over-the-counter drug products for anorectal use were evaluated by an advisory review panel to determine which ingredients are acceptable. The final monograph on over-the-counter anorectal drug products was published in the Federal Register of 3 August 1990 (55 FR 31776).

Phenylephrine hydrochloride is included as a vasoconstrictor in section 346.12(d) and zinc oxide is included both as a protectant in section 346.14(b) (4) and as an astringent in section 346.18(c). Thus, the current Anusol Suppositories formulation contains active ingredients that are in conformance with the monograph.

Although not required by regulation, the product packaging contains the phrase "NEW IMPROVED FORMULA" in two places to alert the consumer to the change in formulation. By placing the warning about heart disease and high blood pressure, and the drug interaction precaution relating to high blood pressure and depression on the product's labeling, the manufacturer has addressed some of Dr. Merikangas' concerns.

The FDA is aware that there is a potential problem with the readability of labels of some over-the-counter drug products, another issue raised by Dr. Merikangas. On 6 March 1991, the FDA published a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the print size and style of labeling for over-the-counter drug products. We received several comments from consumers indicating readability problems. Several other comments pointed out that readability is not only dependent on the size of the print on the labels but also on the style, color, contrast, sharpness of the lettering, use of upper or lower case lettering, the amount of "open space" surrounding the type, and so forth.

Subsequently, the National Drug Manufacturers Association, a trade association of over-the-counter drug manufacturers, established voluntary guidelines for companies to follow.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Weintraub, M.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online