Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Yaes, R. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

LETTER

The Medical Malpractice System

right arrow Robert J. Yaes

1 June 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 11 | Pages 908-909


TO THE EDITOR:

A critical review of Taragin and colleagues' [1] useful analysis of data on medical malpractice cases in the state of New Jersey is not so reassuring. Between 1977 and 1992, there were 12 829 insured physicians, and 11 934 cases were filed. The data analysis on 8231 closed cases, which had been prereviewed by insurance company medical experts, showed that 62% of these cases were "defensible"; that is, there was no clear evidence of physician error. Because a malpractice claim can seriously disrupt a physician's personal and professional life and can cause him or her significant "emotional distress," even when the case is eventually resolved in the physician's favor, this percentage is distressingly high.

Even more disturbing is the fact that payments were made in 21% of the cases classified as defensible. Although Taragin and colleagues suggest the possibility of misclassification, it is also possible that the insurance companies paid the plaintiffs to go away, deciding it was less expensive than defending the case in court, even if ultimately successful.


Reference
space
up arrowTop
dotReference

1. Taragin MI, Willett LR, Wilczek AP, Trout R, Carson JL. The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:780-4.

About Letters
space

The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.





box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Yaes, R. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space


 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online