Mortality Trends in Men and Women with Diabetes, 1971–2000

7 August 2007 | Volume 147 Issue 3

Background: Whether mortality rates among diabetic adults or excess mortality associated with diabetes in the United States has declined in recent decades is not known.

Objective: To examine whether all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality rates have declined among the U.S. population with and without self-reported diabetes.

Design: Comparison of 3 consecutive, nationally representative cohorts.

Setting: Population-based health surveys (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I, II, and III) with mortality follow-up assessment.

Patients: Survey participants age 35 to 74 years with and without diabetes.

Measurements: Diabetes was determined by self-report for each survey (1971–1975, 1976–1980, and 1988–1994), and mortality rates were determined through 1986, 1992, and 2000 for the 3 surveys, respectively.

Results: Among diabetic men, the all-cause mortality rate decreased by 18.2 annual deaths per 1000 persons (from 42.6 to 24.4 annual deaths per 1000 persons; P = 0.03) between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000, accompanying decreases in the nondiabetic population. Cardiovascular disease mortality trends paralleled those of all-cause mortality, with 26.4 annual deaths per 1000 persons in 1971 to 1986 and 12.8 annual deaths per 1000 persons in 1988 to 2000 (P = 0.06). Among women with diabetes, however, neither all-cause nor cardiovascular disease mortality declined between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000, and the all-cause mortality rate difference between diabetic and nondiabetic women more than doubled (from a difference of 8.3 to 18.2 annual deaths per 1000 persons). The reduction in mortality rates among diabetic men eliminated the sex difference in rates among diabetic adults that was observed in earlier surveys.

Limitations: Diabetes was assessed by self-report, and statistical power to examine the factors explaining mortality trends was limited.

Conclusions: Progress in reducing mortality rates among persons with diabetes has been limited to men. Diabetes continues to greatly increase the risk for mortality, particularly among women.

Editors' Notes Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References Context Whether the mortality reductions observed over recent decades in the United States have been similar in the diabetic and nondiabetic populations is unknown. Contribution The 1971–2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys and vital statistics data reveal higher mortality in the diabetic than in the nondiabetic population. Over this period, diabetic men experienced mortality reductions that paralleled those of nondiabetic men. However, the mortality difference between diabetic and nondiabetic women more than doubled. Implications Mortality among diabetic women does not reflect improvements in the care of diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. Understanding the sex differences in diabetes outcomes should be a research priority. —The Editors

 

The decline in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates and the accompanying increases in overall longevity are major public health successes in the United States over the past 40 years (1). These have been attributed to decreases in CVD risk factors, as well as advances in medical management and revascularization, among persons with diagnosed CVD (2, 3). Aggressive CVD risk factor management has been shown to be particularly effective among persons with diabetes, and implementation of these findings into practice along with aggressive diabetes care should, in theory, result in increased longevity among persons with diabetes (4–9).

The quality of diabetes care and levels of certain CVD risk factors have improved among the U.S. population with diagnosed diabetes (10, 11). Whether reductions in mortality have indeed occurred among persons with diabetes, however, remains unclear. Although regional studies of persons with diabetes suggest that rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular complications have declined in recent decades (12–15), the only nationally representative study to examine trends in mortality rates of adults with diabetes found no improvement between 1971 and 1992 (16). However, no national studies of mortality trends of the U.S. diabetic population have extended through the 1990s, a period of major advances in clinical diabetes management, leaving the question of whether longevity among the U.S. population with diabetes has improved (4, 11, 17).

Thus, we assembled data from 3 consecutive nationally representative cohorts to assess whether all-cause and CVD mortality have declined among the U.S. population with diabetes and whether there has been progress in reducing the disparity in mortality rates between persons with and without diabetes.

Methods

Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References

Study Design and Population

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a series of independent, nationally representative health surveys of the U.S. noninstitutionalized population conducted in 1971 to 1974 (NHANES I), 1976 to 1980 (NHANES II), and 1988 to 1994 (NHANES III) (18–20). Each survey used a stratified, multistage probability design that sampled, interviewed, and examined participants to determine their health status. Sampling approaches, interview, and examination methods were standardized across surveys, and data were linked to death certificate data (21). To minimize bias from differential follow-up, we limited follow-up to 12.2 years, which was the maximum period for the survey with the shortest follow-up (NHANES III). Thus, the follow-up years for the 3 survey cohorts were 1971 to 1986, 1976 to 1992, and 1988 to 2000. Overall, 28 043 persons, 27 801 persons, and 39 695 persons were selected for NHANES I, II, and III, respectively, and 75% (20 749 persons), 73% (20 322 persons), and 78% (30 818 persons) were examined. We restricted our analyses to adults age 35 to 74 years who were examined at baseline. These groups included 8654 (80%), 8213 (76%), and 9399 (90%) persons from each of the 3 cohorts. After excluding persons without information on diabetes (7, 3, and 12 persons) or death (176, 5, and 6 persons), we were left with 8471, 8205, and 9381 persons in the primary analyses. Previous analyses have indicated little bias due to nonresponse (22, 23).

Measurements

Demographic characteristics, self-reported diabetes status, duration of disease, insulin use, and history of CVD (heart attack, heart failure, or stroke) were determined by interview. Weight and height were measured and were used to calculate body mass index (BMI). Underlying causes of death were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, with CVD coded as 390 to 448.

Statistical Analyses

We completed mortality rates as the number of deaths divided by the sum of person-years and standardized by age and sex to the 2000 U.S. population. We examined changes in absolute standardized mortality rates over time by using t tests. We also used proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard rate ratios for the NHANES II and III cohorts compared with the NHANES I cohort among the diabetic and nondiabetic populations, with primary models controlling for age, sex, and race or ethnicity and additional models controlling for duration of diabetes and prevalent CVD. We also examined 2-way interactions of survey among persons with diabetes with each of these covariates mentioned. We assessed validity of the proportional hazards assumption by adding time-dependent variables to the model (that is, the interaction of age, sex, or race or ethnicity and the logarithm of follow-up time). Because this assumption was not met across sex, we fit models separately by sex.

Mortality rate estimation and proportional hazards regression incorporated survey weights such that results are representative of the U.S. noninstitutionalized population and account for the stratified, clustered design and the unequal probabilities of selection from oversampling and nonresponse (24). We combined data across the 3 surveys for regression analyses, using the original survey weights and design variables. We renumbered strata to appropriately represent their respective survey, and we calculated degrees of freedom as the number of primary sampling units minus the number of strata. Because we used original survey weights (as opposed to constructing new weights for pooled analyses), these analyses make the assumption that each survey sample is drawn from a different population, as opposed to 3 surveys from a single underlying population (25). We conducted all statistical analyses by using SUDAAN, version 9.1 (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), which uses Taylor series linearization to estimate variances.

Role of the Funding Source

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is the funding source for NHANES and oversees the conduct and reporting of the NHANES surveys.

Results

Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References

Among both men and women with diabetes, the proportion of nonwhite persons roughly doubled across the survey years, the level of education increased substantially, and mean BMI increased (Table 1). In diabetic women but not diabetic men, the average age of diagnosis decreased statistically significantly (mean decrease, 2.9 years) across the 3 surveys, and the average age of the diabetic population decreased by 2.5 years, from 59.1 to 56.6 years. Almost all of the secular trends in race or ethnicity, education, and BMI observed in persons with diabetes also occurred in those without diabetes.

 

Between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000 in the overall nondiabetic population (both men and women), all-cause mortality rates decreased from 14.4 to 9.5 annual deaths per 1000 persons (P < 0.001) and CVD deaths decreased from 7.0 to 3.4 annual deaths per 1000 persons (P < 0.001) (Table 2). Among the overall diabetic population, the all-cause mortality rate did not statistically significantly change (30 annual deaths per 1000 persons in 1971 to 1986 vs. 25.2 annual deaths per 1000 persons in 1988 to 2000). For CVD mortality, the absolute difference in mortality among the diabetic population between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000 (18.2 vs. 11.1 annual deaths per 1000 persons) was greater than that of the nondiabetic population, but this decrease was not significant (P = 0.09).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Trends in Mortality Rates (95% CIs) in the U.S. Population, by Diabetes Status and Sex, 1971–2000*

 

Findings in the overall population, however, obscured important sex-related differences, wherein mortality rates decreased among diabetic men but not among diabetic women (interaction survey year x sex: P = 0.005 for all-cause mortality; P = 0.59 for CVD mortality) (Figure 1). All-cause mortality rates among diabetic men decreased by 43% (from 42.6 to 24.4 annual deaths per 1000 persons) between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000 (P = 0.03). The all-cause mortality rate ratio for diabetic men in 1988 to 2000 compared with 1971 to 1986, in an analysis that controlled for age and race or ethnicity, was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.86). Cardiovascular disease mortality rate trends paralleled those of all-cause mortality (26.4 vs. 12.8 annual deaths per 1000 persons; P = 0.06 for difference) (Table 2 and Figure 2). The CVD mortality rate ratio for diabetic men in 1988 to 2000 compared with 1971 to 1986, in an analysis that controlled for age, sex, and race or ethnicity, was 0.62 (CI, 0.39 to 1.01) (Table 2 and Figure 2). Additional adjustment for diabetes duration, BMI, and prevalent CVD had no appreciable effect on the mortality rate ratios (data not shown).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Age-adjusted all-cause mortality rates (95% CIs) among the U.S. population with and without diabetes, by cohort and sex. Mortality rates are calculated as annual deaths per 1000 persons.

 

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Age-adjusted cardiovascular disease mortality rates (95% CIs) among the U.S. population with and without diabetes, by cohort and sex. Mortality rates are calculated as annual deaths per 1000 persons.

 

The absolute difference in all-cause mortality rates between men with and without diabetes was 23.6 annual deaths per 1000 persons (42.6 vs. 19.0 deaths) in 1971 to 1986 compared with 12.8 annual deaths per 1000 persons (24.4 vs. 11.6 deaths) in 1988 to 2000 (Figure 1). For CVD mortality, the absolute difference was 16.8 annual deaths per 1000 persons (26.4 vs. 9.6 deaths) in 1971 to 1986 compared with 8.1 annual deaths per 1000 persons (12.8 vs. 4.7 deaths) in 1988 to 2000 (Table 2 and Figure 2). Although absolute changes in mortality rates among diabetic men were at least as great as those among nondiabetic men, an 88% higher all-cause mortality rate and 153% higher CVD mortality rate in nondiabetic men persisted in 1988 to 2000.

Among diabetic women, however, neither all-cause nor CVD mortality rates decreased between 1971 to 1986 and 1988 to 2000, and the all-cause mortality rate difference between women with and without diabetes more than doubled (from 8.3 to 18.2 annual deaths per 1000 persons; P = 0.04) (Figure 1). The hazard rate ratios for diabetic women in 1988 to 2000 compared with 1971 to 1986 were 1.31 (CI, 0.86 to 1.98) for all-cause mortality and 0.89 (CI, 0.49 to 1.59) for CVD mortality. Further adjustment for duration of diabetes, BMI, and prevalent CVD attenuated the hazard rate ratios somewhat (hazard rate ratios, 1.15 (CI, 0.75 to 1.75) and 0.73 (CI, 0.41 to 1.30), respectively). In 1988 to 2000, the mortality rate ratio associated with diabetes (compared with women without diabetes) was 2.84 (CI, 2.08 to 3.89) for all-cause mortality and 3.66 (CI, 2.48 to 5.42) for CVD mortality (Table 2). Finally, a comparison of NHANES I and NHANES III (Table 2) revealed that the differences in all-cause mortality rates by sex among people with diabetes in 1971 to 1986 (42.6 vs. 18.4 annual deaths per 1000 persons) were essentially eliminated in 1988 to 2000 (24.4 vs. 25.9 annual deaths per 1000 persons). This occurred to a lesser extent with CVD mortality.

Discussion

Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References

Our examination of U.S. adults with self-reported diabetes suggests that the well-documented reductions in mortality rates in the general U.S. adult population during the last 25 years have included men with diabetes but their female diabetic peers have been left behind. Men with diabetes experienced a 43% relative reduction in the age-adjusted mortality rate, which is similar to that of nondiabetic men. Among women with diabetes, however, mortality rates did not decrease, and the difference in mortality rates between diabetic and nondiabetic women doubled. Several factors could explain the decrease among diabetic men, ranging from primary prevention of CVD risk factors to improved lifesaving technology among persons with CVD or diabetes complications (1–3, 26–28). Improvements have been shown in rates of smoking, lipid concentrations, and glycemic control, as well as more patients using aspirin, having an annual lipid profile, and receiving influenza vaccination (10,11, 29). Accompanying dietary trends have favored a less atherogenic profile in the overall U. S. population (1, 26–28). Reductions in hospitalization rates among people with diabetes for CVD, ischemic heart disease, and stroke have also been observed, particularly among men (30).

The lack of improvement among women is concerning. Some studies have documented less improvement in CVD risk factors among women and smaller increases in the use of antihypertensive therapy and aspirin (10, 31, 32). Female sex is also linked to both less aggressive medical management and worse outcomes after revascularization and hospitalization for CVD (33–38). Sex differences in the pathophysiology of coronary heart disease have been proposed, including a greater tendency for women to have microvascular coronary heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy, differences in inflammatory and hormonal responses to risk factors, more complicated patterns of symptoms, and less accurate diagnoses of coronary heart disease (39–42). Whether these factors would differentially influence mortality rates among women with diabetes is not clear. A greater decrease in age at diagnosis among women than men may also have influenced mortality rates (29, 43, 44); although adjustment for duration of diabetes in our analyses did not alter the results.

Our findings for men are consistent with reports from regional U.S. populations (14, 15), as well as a recent report from Ontario, Canada (45). The finding among women is consistent with an earlier comparison of the 1970s and 1980s NHANES I cohorts, as well as the finding of an increased ischemic heart disease mortality rate among Native American women (44, 46). Our conclusions differ from those of the Framingham Heart study, where incidence and mortality rates for CVD have declined (15); of a study in North Dakota, where mortality declined among both men and women with diabetes in the 1990s (14); and the Ontario study over the last 10 years (45). However, those studies examined largely white populations and different time periods. The Framingham Heart study compared mortality rates from cohorts of the 1950s and 1960s, when CVD mortality rates were notably high, to cohorts of the 1980s and 1990s. The North Dakota study was limited to the 1990s.

One limitation is our reliance on self-report to identify diabetes status, because glucose level was not measured in NHANES I and was limited to subsamples of the later surveys. Self-reported diabetes has high specificity and positive predictive value but has low sensitivity, because many persons with undetected hyperglycemia are classified in the nondiabetic group (47). Surveillance data suggest that the proportion of undiagnosed diabetes cases has declined somewhat over recent decades, albeit not statistically significantly (48, 49). This issue is further complicated by the changes in diagnostic criteria during this time period. We controlled for demographic factors, BMI, and years since diagnosis to account for these factors, but we cannot rule out the possibility that increasing detection or changing diagnostic criteria have led to subtle changes in the severity or type of diabetes cases over the surveys. We consider it unlikely, however, that shifts in the characteristics of diabetes would explain the sex differences in mortality trends that we observed.

Another limitation was our relatively small sample sizes in sex-specific analyses. Combined with the lack of detailed information on treatments and incident medical events, this limitation precluded a thorough analysis of the factors that might have explained the trends in mortality rates. Finally, our lack of institutionalized persons means that our findings may not fully reflect the experience of people with end-stage cardiovascular and renal disease. In light of these limitations, we interpret our findings as representative of the community-dwelling population with self-reported diabetes but suggest that further study is needed to describe mortality trends in the entire diabetic population, especially in women.

In summary, these national data reveal 3 key findings: 1) Reductions in mortality occurred among diabetic men but not among diabetic women; 2) disparities in mortality rates between women with and without diabetes have worsened; and 3) the female-over-male advantage in mortality rates among the diabetic population has been eliminated. These findings should stimulate more research on why the improvements in diabetes care and important risk factors are not reflected in reduced mortality for women with diabetes, as well as continued public health efforts to reduce the excess mortality risk among men and especially among women with diabetes.

Author and Article Information

Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References

From the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Edward Gregg, PhD, Division of Diabetes Translation (K-10), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3727.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Gregg and Cheng: Division of Diabetes Translation (K-10), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3727.

Dr. Gu: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Metro IV Building, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dr. Narayan: The Rollins School of Public Health, Room 730, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Dr. Cowie: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 691, Bethesda, MD 20892-5460.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: E.W. Gregg, K.M.V. Narayan.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: E.W. Gregg, Q. Gu, Y.J. Cheng, K.M.V. Narayan, C.C. Cowie.

Drafting of the article: E.W. Gregg.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: E.W. Gregg, Y.J. Cheng, K.M.V. Narayan, C.C. Cowie.

Final approval of the article: E.W. Gregg, Y.J. Cheng, K.M.V. Narayan, C.C. Cowie.

Statistical expertise: Q. Gu.

Obtaining of funding: E.W. Gregg, C.C. Cowie.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: E.W. Gregg, K.M.V. Narayan.

Collection and assembly of data: Q. Gu, Y.J. Cheng.

References

Top Editors' Notes Methods Results Discussion Author & Article Info References

1.  Cooper R, Cutler J, Desvigne-Nickens P, Fortmann SP, Friedman L, Havlik R, et al. Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation. 2000;102:3137-47. [PMID: 11120707].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2.  Ergin A, Muntner P, Sherwin R, He J. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease mortality, incidence, and case fatality rates in adults in the United States. Am J Med. 2004;117:219-27. [PMID: 15308430].[Medline]

3.  Hunink MG, Goldman L, Tosteson AN, Mittleman MA, Goldman PA, Williams LW, et al. The recent decline in mortality from coronary heart disease, 1980-1990. The effect of secular trends in risk factors and treatment. JAMA. 1997;277:535-42. [PMID: 9032159].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703-13. [PMID: 9732337].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5.  Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:383-93. [PMID: 12556541].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6.  Goldberg RB, Mellies MJ, Sacks FM, Moyé LA, Howard BV, Howard WJ, et al. Cardiovascular events and their reduction with pravastatin in diabetic and glucose-intolerant myocardial infarction survivors with average cholesterol levels: subgroup analyses in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. The Care Investigators. Circulation. 1998;98:2513-9. [PMID: 9843456].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7.  Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P, Cull CA, Holman RR, Egger M, et al. Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2006;152:27-38. [PMID: 16824829].[Medline]

8.  Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. JAMA. 2003;290:2159-67. [PMID: 14570951].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9.  Nichol KL, Wuorenma J, von Sternberg T. Benefits of influenza vaccination for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk senior citizens. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1769-76. [PMID: 9738606].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10.  Imperatore G, Cadwell BL, Geiss L, Saadinne JB, Williams DE, Ford ES, et al. Thirty-year trends in cardiovascular risk factor levels among US adults with diabetes: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1971-2000. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:531-9. [PMID: 15353413].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11.  Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Imperatore G, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:465-74. [PMID: 16585660].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12.  Pambianco G, Costacou T, Ellis D, Becker DJ, Klein R, Orchard TJ. The 30-year natural history of type 1 diabetes complications: the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study experience. Diabetes. 2006;55:1463-9. [PMID: 16644706].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13.  Thomas RJ, Palumbo PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Roger VL, Ransom J, O'Brien PC, et al. Trends in the mortality burden associated with diabetes mellitus: a population-based study in Rochester, Minn, 1970-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:445-51. [PMID: 12588203].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14.  Tierney EF, Cadwell BL, Engelgau MM, Shireley L, Parsons SL, Moum K, et al. Declining mortality rate among people with diabetes in North Dakota, 1997-2002. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2723-5. [PMID: 15505011].[Free Full Text]

15.  Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, Levy D, Meigs JB, D'Agostino RB Sr, et al. Trends in cardiovascular complications of diabetes. JAMA. 2004;292:2495-9. [PMID: 15562129].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16.  Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Diabetes and decline in heart disease mortality in US adults. JAMA. 1999;281:1291-7. [PMID: 10208144].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17.  Narayan KM, Gregg EW, Fagot-Campagna A, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F. Diabetes—a common, growing, serious, costly, and potentially preventable public health problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50 Suppl 2:S77-84. [PMID: 11024588].[Medline]

18.  Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994:1-407. [PMID: 7975354].[Medline]

19.  Cohen BB, Barbano HE, Cox CS, Feldman JJ, Finucane FF, Kleinman JC, et al. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study: 1982-84. Vital Health Stat 1. 1987:1-142. [PMID: 3672939].[Medline]

20.  McDowell A, Engel A, Massey JT, Maurer K. Plan and operation of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976-1980. Vital Health Stat 1. 1981:1-144. [PMID: 7344293].[Medline]

21.  Loria CM, Sempos CT, Vuong C. Plan and operation of the NHANES II Mortality Study, 1992. Vital Health Stat 1. 1999:1-16. [PMID: 10464470].[Medline]

22.  Forthofer RN. Investigation of nonresponse bias in NHANES II. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:507-15. [PMID: 6837562].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23.  Mohadjer LBB, Waksberg J. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III: Accounting for Nonresponse Bias. Rockville, MD: WESTAT; 1996.

24.  National Center for Health Statistics. Analytic and Reporting Guidelines: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES III (1988–94). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.

25.  Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: Wiley; 1999:279-80. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

26.  Briefel RR, Johnson CL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:401-31. [PMID: 15189126].[Medline]

27.  Trends in intake of energy and macronutrients—United States, 1971-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:80-2. [PMID: 14762332].[Medline]

28.  Ernst ND, Sempos CT, Briefel RR, Clark MB. Consistency between US dietary fat intake and serum total cholesterol concentrations: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:965S-972S. [PMID: 9322575].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29.  Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291:335-42. [PMID: 14734596].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30.  Geiss L, Engelgau M, Pogach L, Acton K, Fleming B, Roman S, et al. A national progress report on diabetes: successes and challenges. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7:198-203. [PMID: 15738716].[Medline]

31.  Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. JAMA. 2003;290:199-206. [PMID: 12851274].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32.  Persell SD, Baker DW. Aspirin use among adults with diabetes: recent trends and emerging sex disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2492-9. [PMID: 15596642].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33.  Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, Coglianese ME, Gersh B, Geltman EM, et al. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:226-30. [PMID: 2057023].[Abstract]

34.  Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Gore JM, French WJ, et al. Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:981-8. [PMID: 9588431].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35.  Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ. Diabetes and coronary revascularization. JAMA. 2005;293:1501-8. [PMID: 15784875].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36.  Abbott RD, Donahue RP, Kannel WB, Wilson PW. The impact of diabetes on survival following myocardial infarction in men vs women. The Framingham Study. JAMA. 1988;260:3456-60. [PMID: 2974889].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37.  Barrett-Connor E, Wingard DL. Sex differential in ischemic heart disease mortality in diabetics: a prospective population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:489-96. [PMID: 6637976].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38.  Gustafsson I, Brendorp B, Seibaek M, Burchardt H, Hildebrandt P, Køber L, et al. Influence of diabetes and diabetes-gender interaction on the risk of death in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:771-7. [PMID: 14998615].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39.  Kanaya AM, Grady D, Barrett-Connor E. Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1737-45. [PMID: 12153377].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40.  Natarajan S, Liao Y, Cao G, Lipsitz SR, McGee DL. Sex differences in risk for coronary heart disease mortality associated with diabetes and established coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1735-40. [PMID: 12885690].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41.  Natarajan S, Liao Y, Sinha D, Cao G, McGee DL, Lipsitz SR. Sex differences in the effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:430-5. [PMID: 15738373].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42.  L'abbate A. Large and micro coronary vascular involvement in diabetes. Pharmacol Rep. 2005;57 Suppl:3-9. [PMID: 16415482].[Medline]

43.  Koopman RJ, Mainous AG 3rd, Diaz VA, Geesey ME. Changes in age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States, 1988 to 2000. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:60-3. [PMID: 15671192].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44.  Pavkov ME, Sievers ML, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Nelson RG. An explanation for the increase in heart disease mortality rates in diabetic Pima Indians: effect of renal replacement therapy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1132-6. [PMID: 15111533].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45.  Lipscombe LL, Hux JE. Trends in diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality in Ontario, Canada 1995-2005: a population-based study. Lancet. 2007;369:750-6. [PMID: 17336651].[Medline]

46.  Hoehner CM, Williams DE, Sievers ML, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Nelson RG. Trends in heart disease death rates in diabetic and nondiabetic Pima Indians. J Diabetes Complications. 2006;20:8-13. [PMID: 16389161].[Medline]

47.  Saydah SH, Geiss LS, Tierney E, Benjamin SM, Engelgau M, Brancati F. Review of the performance of methods to identify diabetes cases among vital statistics, administrative, and survey data. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:507-16. [PMID: 15301787].[Medline]

48.  Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, Eberhardt MS, Flegal KM, Engelgau MM, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1263-8. [PMID: 16732006].[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Read all Rapid Responses

New bedside way in Reducing mortality in diabetic men and women.

Sergio Stagnaro

Annals Online, 21 Jun 2007 [Full text]

Diabetes Care in the 21st century: Where have we been?

saad sakkal

Annals Online, 7 Aug 2007 [Full text]

Higher mortality in diabetic women and nonfasting triglyceride levels

P Dileep Kumar

Annals Online, 20 Aug 2007 [Full text]