Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 

Abstract/Editors' Note | Full Text | PDF

FIGURES/TABLES SUMMARY PAGE

PowerPoint slides are available for most Figures at Annals.org

Effectiveness of Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine for Treating Dementia: Evidence Review for a Clinical Practice Guideline


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.

The term companion refers to multiple reports from a single study. The authors considered the first published study as the main paper and referred to all associated reports as "companion papers." DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; NINCDS = National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Summary estimates for the change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) scores.

For donepezil (10 mg/d) versus placebo (Alzheimer disease [AD], all severity levels), the estimate was statistically significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.94). For donepezil (10 mg/d) versus placebo (mild cognitive impairment), the estimate was not significant (P = 0.31) and tests for heterogeneity were significant (I2 = 75.5%; P = 0.043). For donepezil (10 mg/d) versus placebo (mild to moderate vascular dementia), the estimate was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I= 0.0%; P = 0.84). For galantamine (24 mg) versus placebo (mild to moderate AD), the estimate was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were significant (I= 75.5%; P = 0.001). For galantamine (24 mg) versus placebo (mild to moderate AD and vascular dementia), the estimate was significant (P < 0.001). For rivastigmine (6 mg and 12 mg) versus placebo (AD, all severity levels), the estimate was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were significant (I2 = 90.8%; P < 0.001). For memantine (20 mg) versus placebo (mild to moderate AD), the estimate was not significant (P = 0.25). For memantine (20 mg) versus placebo (mild to moderate vascular dementia), the estimate was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 11.4%; P = 0.29).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary Effect Sizes for Outcomes of Benefit Computed for Donepezil in at Least 2 Studies

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Summary relative risks for improvement or stabilization from baseline on the clinician-based impression of change scale, with caregiver input.

For donepezil versus placebo (Alzheimer disease [AD], all severity levels), the relative risk (RR) for improvement was statistically significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.762). For donepezil versus placebo (AD, all severity levels), the RR for improvement or stabilization was significant (P < 0.001). For donepezil versus placebo (mild to moderate vascular dementia), the RR for improvement or stabilization was not significant (P = 0.633) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 55.1%; P = 0.136). For galantamine versus placebo (mild to moderate AD), the RR for improvement or stabilization was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 19.9%; P > 0.20). For galantamine versus placebo (mild to moderate AD and vascular dementia), the RR for improvement or stabilization was significant (P = 0.002). For memantine versus placebo (AD, all severity levels), the RR for improvement was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 0.0%; P > 0.20). For memantine versus placebo (AD, all severity levels), the RR for improvement or stabilization was significant (P < 0.001) and tests for heterogeneity were not significant (I2 = 13.8%; P > 0.20). For rivastigmine versus placebo (AD, all severity levels), the RR for improvement or stabilization was not significant (P = 0.114).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Summary Effect Sizes for Outcomes of Benefit and Harm Computed for Galantamine in at Least 2 Studies*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Summary Effect Sizes for Outcomes of Benefit and Harm Computed for Rivastigmine in at Least 2 Studies*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Summary Effect Sizes for Outcomes of Benefit Computed for Memantine in at Least 2 Studies

 





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Physicians.