Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search

Abstract/Editors' Note | Full Text | PDF

FIGURES/TABLES SUMMARY PAGE

PowerPoint slides are available for most Figures at Annals.org

Stopping at Nothing? Some Dilemmas of Data Monitoring in Clinical Trials


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure. Distribution of observed effects in trials with and without stopping rules.

The trials were designed to have 90% power to detect a 10% mortality benefit (for example, 50% vs. 40%). Each panel corresponds to a different underlying true difference: no difference (top), 10% difference (middle), and 20% difference (bottom). The distribution of results is shown for trials of 2 designs: 1 using a 4-look O'Brien–Fleming stopping rule ("stopping") and 1 using a fixed sample size ("no stopping"). Median effect size and 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of each estimate are reported in parentheses. The mean sample size is reported for the "stopping" trial only: n = 1040 for the fixed sample size design.

 





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Physicians.