Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search

Abstract/Editors' Note | Full Text | PDF

FIGURES/TABLES SUMMARY PAGE

PowerPoint slides are available for most Figures at Annals.org

The Association between Quality of Care and the Intensity of Diabetes Disease Management Programs


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure. Description of sampling and response rate. *Patients receiving care in one of the Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study health plans and whose diabetes diagnosis was based on the following criteria: a diagnostic code for diabetes (for example, 2 or more outpatient visits with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 250.xx) or 1 or more inpatient stays with an associated diabetes code; results of laboratory studies suggestive of diabetes (for example, 2 or more hemoglobin A1c tests or diagnostic levels of hemoglobin A1c or fasting blood glucose); or a prescription for medications for diabetes (for example, insulin or an oral antidiabetic agent). {dagger}At the time of the survey, patients who met the initial criteria were included only if they verified that they had diabetes and received most of their diabetes care through the participating TRIAD health plan. {ddagger}Participants cared for under direct contracting agreements with health plans rather than in physician groups were assigned a value of 0 for each care management strategy at the physician group level.

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected Item-Level Responses for Provider Groups for Each Disease Management Strategy*

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Each Clinical Care Strategy Composite{webonly}

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical Management Measures for Hemoglobin A1c, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol*

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Distributions of Patient Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Predictors across Physician Groups*

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Distribution of Quality Indicators, Mean Intermediate Outcome Levels, and Clinical Management Variables across Physician Groups*

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Adjusted Association of Physician Group Disease Management with Quality Indicators, Intermediate Outcome Levels, and Medical Management of Intermediate Outcomes*

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Table 2. Adjusted Association of Physician Group Disease Management with Quality Indicators, Intermediate Outcome Levels, and Medical Management of Intermediate Outcomes (Third, Second, and First Tertiles)*{webonly}

 





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Physicians.