Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 

Abstract/Editors' Note | Full Text | PDF

FIGURES/TABLES SUMMARY PAGE

PowerPoint slides are available for most Figures at Annals.org

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force


View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Screening Trials for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Meta-analysis of mortality associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms in the abdominal aortic aneurysm screening trials. MASS = Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study; OR = odds ratio.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of all-cause mortality in the abdominal aortic aneurysm screening trials. MASS = Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study; OR = odds ratio. *Age = standardized numbers were used for the Western Australia trial because of an early age imbalance that was subsequently corrected (24).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) greater than 3.0 cm, according to age and smoking history.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Figure 1. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs): analytic framework.{webonly} KQ = key question. KQ 1a = Does AAA screening, in an asymptomatic average-risk or high-risk population, reduce AAA-related adverse health outcomes? KQ 1b = For individuals who do not have AAAs on initial screening, does periodic repeated screening reduce AAA-related adverse health outcomes? KQ 2 = What are the harms associated with AAA screening? KQ 3 = For AAAs 3.0 to 5.4 cm detected through screening, does immediate repair or surveillance reduce AAA-related adverse health outcomes? KQ 4 = What are the harms associated with repair of AAAs 5.5 cm or greater? KQ 5 = What are the harms associated with immediate repair or surveillance of AAAs 3.0 to 5.4 cm?

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Figure 2. Trial flow diagram of studies evaluated for inclusion in each key question (KQ).{webonly} All abstracts were reviewed for relevance to other KQs. Articles from experts or reference lists were also reviewed if relevant.

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Five-Year Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening by Smoking History in a Cohort of 100 000 Men 65 to 74 Years of Age

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Table. Formulas for Calculations in Outcomes Table 2{webonly}

 





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Physicians.