Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search

Abstract/Editors' Note | Full Text | PDF

FIGURES/TABLES SUMMARY PAGE

PowerPoint slides are available for most Figures at Annals.org

The Effect of Including C-Reactive Protein in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models for Women


View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Best-Fitting Global Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model among the Model Derivation Cohort of 15 048 Women from the Women's Health Study

 

Figure 1
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relative risk (RR) of future cardiovascular events according to baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in the model derivation cohort (n= 15 048), adjusted for Framingham covariables. Risk estimates are provided on a natural log scale and were derived from a Cox regression model using a flexible spline curve. Dotted lines represent 95% CIs.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cardiovascular point scoring system for women based on Framingham covariables and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). This scoring system is intended as an illustration only. CVD = cardiovascular disease; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; RR = relative risk; SBP = systolic blood pressure. To convert cholesterol values to mmol/L, multiply by 0.02586.

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Relative Contribution of Individual Framingham Covariables and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Global Cardiovascular Risk

 

Figure 3
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Calibration curves for risk prediction models without (top) and with (bottom) high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in the model. The model that includes hsCRP shows closer agreement between observed and model-based predicted risk. WHS = Women's Health Study.

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Appendix Table. Comparison of Discrimination and Calibration for Global Risk Prediction Models with and without High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein{webonly}

 

View this table:

[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Observed and Expected Risks among all 26 927 Nondiabetic Women in the Women's Health Study Using the Final Global Risk Prediction Model with and without High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

 





 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Physicians.