Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  Davidoff, F.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

Publication Guidelines for Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project

right arrow Frank Davidoff, MD; Paul Batalden, MD; David Stevens, MD; Greg Ogrinc, MD, MS; and Susan Mooney, MD, MS, for the SQUIRE Development Group*

4 November 2008 | Volume 149 Issue 9 | Pages 670-676

In 2005, draft guidelines were published for reporting studies of quality improvement as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarizes the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also explains the development process, which included formulation of responses to informal feedback, written commentaries, and input from publication guideline developers; ongoing review of the literature on the epistemology of improvement and methods for evaluating complex social programs; and a meeting of stakeholders for critical review of the guidelines' content and wording, followed by commentary on sequential versions from an expert consultant group. Finally, the report discusses limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.

Author and Article Information


From the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Center for Leadership and Improvement, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Some of the work reported in this article was done at the SQUIRE Advisory Committee Meeting, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 35 April 2007.

Note: A slightly different version of this article is being published in Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2008;17(Suppl 1):i3-10, as well as in other journals. This article is therefore not copyrighted and may be freely reproduced and distributed.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank Rosemary Gibson and Laura Leviton for their unflagging support of this project, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement for their gracious help in hosting the review meeting in Cambridge, and Joy McAvoy for her invaluable administrative work in coordinating the entire development process.

Grant Support: The SQUIRE project was supported in part by grant 58073 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Frank Davidoff, MD, 143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109; e-mail, fdavidoff{at}cox.net.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Davidoff: 143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109.

Dr. Batalden and Stevens: 30 Lafayette Street, Lebanon, NH 03766.

Dr. Ogrinc: 215 North Main Street (170), White River Junction, VT 05009.

Dr. Mooney: Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital, 125 Mascoma Street, Lebanon, NH 03766.

* Members of the SQUIRE Development Group who provided input during the development process and endorsed the SQUIRE guidelines are listed in the Appendix.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Do Quality Improvement Collaboratives Improve Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgical Patients?
Stephen K. Liu, Karen Homa, Paul Batalden, AND Frank Davidoff
Annals 2009 150: 358. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. K. Liu, K. Homa, P. Batalden, and F. Davidoff
Do Quality Improvement Collaboratives Improve Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgical Patients?
Ann Intern Med, March 3, 2009; 150(5): 358 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Little, J. P.T. Higgins, J. P.A. Ioannidis, D. Moher, F. Gagnon, E. von Elm, M. J. Khoury, B. Cohen, G. Davey-Smith, J. Grimshaw, et al.
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): An Extension of the STROBE Statement
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 206 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. C. Sox
Improving the Quality of Reporting Studies of Quality Improvement: The SQUIRE Guidelines
Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2008; 149(9): 683 - 683.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Physicians.