Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow 
pier article
Related Clinical
Content
space
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  Wachter, R. M.
space
 arrow  Pronovost, P. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

IMPROVING PATIENT CARE

Public Reporting of Antibiotic Timing in Patients with Pneumonia: Lessons from a Flawed Performance Measure

right arrow Robert M. Wachter, MD; Scott A. Flanders, MD; Christopher Fee, MD; and Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD

1 July 2008 | Volume 149 Issue 1 | Pages 29-32

The administration of antibiotics within 4 hours to patients with community-acquired pneumonia has been criticized as a quality standard because it pressures clinicians to rapidly administer antibiotics despite diagnostic uncertainty at the time of patients' initial presentations. The measure was recently revised (to 6 hours) in response to this criticism. On the basis of the experience with the 4-hour rule, the authors make 5 recommendations for the development of future publicly reported quality measures. First, results from samples with known diagnoses should be extrapolated cautiously, if at all, to patients without a diagnosis. Second, for some measures, "bands" of performance may make more sense than "all-or-nothing" expectations. Third, representative end users of quality measures should participate in measure development. Fourth, quality measurement and reporting programs should build in mechanisms to reassess measures over time. Finally, biases, both financial and intellectual, that may influence quality measure development should be minimized. These steps will increase the probability that future quality measures will improve care without creating negative unintended consequences.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Consultancies: R.M. Wachter (American Board of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Advisory Board, Google). Honoraria: R.M. Wachter (Dr. Wachter has done more than 100 talks on issues of quality and patients safety to several health care organizations.). Grants received: R.M. Wachter (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality).

Requests for Single Reprints: Robert M. Wachter, MD, Room M-994, Department of Medicine, 505 Parnassus Avenue, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0120; e-mail, bobw{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Wachter: Room M-994, Department of Medicine, 505 Parnassus, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0120.

Dr. Flanders: University of Michigan, 3119F Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-03766.

Dr. Fee: University of California, Box 0208, 505 Parnassus, San Francisco, CA 94143-0208.

Dr. Pronovost: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Surgery, and Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1909 Thames Street, 2nd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21231.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: R.M. Wachter, S.A. Flanders, P.J. Pronovost.

Drafting of the article: R.M. Wachter, S.A. Flanders, C. Fee, P.J. Pronovost.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: S.A. Flanders, C. Fee, P.J. Pronovost.

Final approval of the article: R.M. Wachter, S.A. Flanders, C. Fee, P.J. Pronovost.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: R.M. Wachter.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Annals:

Letters
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Nathan C. Dean
Annals 2009 150: 219. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Manfred Gogol
Annals 2009 150: 219. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Nadine Srouji
Annals 2009 150: 220. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Robert M. Wachter, Christopher Fee, AND Scott A. Flanders
Annals 2009 150: 220. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
D. P Stevens
Quality and safety are rarely simple
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 82 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. H. Conway and C. Clancy
Transformation of Health Care at the Front Line
JAMA, February 18, 2009; 301(7): 763 - 765.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
N. C. Dean
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 219 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
N. Srouji
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 220 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Gogol
The Unintended, Negative Consequences of the Door-to-Antibiotic Measure for Pneumonia
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 219 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. C. Mathews and P. J. Pronovost
Physician Autonomy and Informed Decision Making: Finding the Balance for Patient Safety and Quality
JAMA, December 24, 2008; 300(24): 2913 - 2915.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Improving Quality Metrics
Nadine Srouji
Annals Online, 24 Jul 2008 [Full text]
Timing of antibiotics and mortality in geriatric CAP patients
Manfred Gogol
Annals Online, 6 Aug 2008 [Full text]
Consequences of Flawed Performance Measures on a Local Pneumonia Guideline
Nathan C. Dean
Annals Online, 8 Aug 2008 [Full text]
TFAD- A measure flawed in many ways
P Dileep Kumar
Annals Online, 18 Aug 2008 [Full text]
Authors' Response to Letters on Flawed Antibiotic Timing Measure
Robert M. Wachter, et al.
Annals Online, 19 Aug 2008 [Full text]



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Physicians.