Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Correction
space
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow 
pier article
Related Clinical
Content
space
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Chou, R.
space
  arrow  Huffman, L. H.
space
 arrow  PubMed                        
space

CLINICAL GUIDELINES

Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

right arrow Roger Chou, MD, and Laurie Hoyt Huffman, MS

2 October 2007 | Volume 147 Issue 7 | Pages 505-514

Background: Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits.

Purpose: To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain).

Data Sources: English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts.

Study Selection: Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction.

Data Extraction: We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials.

Data Synthesis: We found good evidence that NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that acetaminophen, opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (≤4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes.

Limitations: Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non–English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews.

Conclusions: Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Disclaimer: No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the American Pain Society.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Jayne Schablaske and Michelle Pappas for administrative support.

Grant Support: This article is based on research conducted at the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center with funding from the American Pain Society.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Honoraria: R. Chou (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals).

Requests for Single Reprints: Roger Chou, MD, Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mailcode BICC, Portland, OR 97239; e-mail, chour{at}ohsu.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Chou and Ms. Huffman: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mailcode BICC, Portland, OR 97239.


Related articles in Annals:

Clinical Guidelines
Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
Roger Chou, Amir Qaseem, Vincenza Snow, Donald Casey, J. Thomas Cross, Jr, Paul Shekelle, Douglas K. Owens, AND for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians and the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel*
Annals 2007 147: 478-491. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Clinical Guidelines
Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Roger Chou AND Laurie Hoyt Huffman
Annals 2007 147: 492-504. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  

Summaries for Patients
Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society
Annals 2007 147: I-45. [Full Text]  

Letters
Overviews and Systematic Reviews on Low Back Pain
Jan M. Bjordal, Atle Klovning, Rodrigo Alvaro B. Lopes-Martins, Pål-Didrik Hoff Roland, Jon Joensen, AND Lars Slørdal
Annals 2008 148: 789-790. [Full Text]  

Letters
Overviews and Systematic Reviews on Low Back Pain
Edzard Ernst
Annals 2008 148: 790-791. [Full Text]  

Letters
Overviews and Systematic Reviews on Low Back Pain
Roger Chou, Paul Shekelle, Amir Qaseem, AND Douglas K. Owens
Annals 2008 148: 791-792. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. E. Cornell and C. Laine
The Science and Art of Deduction: Complex Systematic Overviews
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 786 - 788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. M. Bjordal, A. Klovning, R. A. B. Lopes-Martins, P.-D. H. Roland, J. Joensen, and L. Slordal
Overviews and Systematic Reviews on Low Back Pain
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 789 - 790.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou, P. Shekelle, A. Qaseem, and D. K. Owens
Overviews and Systematic Reviews on Low Back Pain
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 791 - 792.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou, P. Shekelle, A. Qaseem, and D. K. Owens
Correction: Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain
Ann Intern Med, February 5, 2008; 148(3): 247 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain
Journal Watch (General), October 25, 2007; 2007(1025): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou, A. Qaseem, V. Snow, D. Casey, J. T. Cross Jr, P. Shekelle, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee
Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 478 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou and L. H. Huffman
Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Overviews are methodically inferior to systematic reviews and contribute to myths of effective drugs
Jan M Bjordal, et al.
Annals Online, 17 Oct 2007 [Full text]
Correction
Roger Chou, et al.
Annals Online, 5 Dec 2007 [Full text]
In Response
Roger Chou, et al.
Annals Online, 5 Dec 2007 [Full text]



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Physicians.