Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
Originally published on June 18, 2007.
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
All Versions of this Article:
  arrow 147/2/135 (most recent)
  arrow 0000605-200707170-00173v1
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Recommendation Summary
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  Meyers, D. S.
space
 arrow  Luckhaupt, S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

CLINICAL GUIDELINES

Screening for Chlamydial Infection: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

right arrow David S. Meyers, MD; Heather Halvorson, MD, MPH; and Sara Luckhaupt, MD, MPH

17 July 2007 | Volume 147 Issue 2 | Pages 135-142

Background: Chlamydial infection is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection in the United States, with an estimated 3 million new cases annually. In 2001, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended that clinicians screen all sexually active women at increased risk for infection for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Purpose: To summarize a systematic evidence review commissioned by the USPSTF in preparation for an update of its 2001 recommendation.

Data Sources: English-language articles identified in PubMed between July 2000 and July 2005. Additional articles were identified by bibliographic reviews and discussions with experts. A total of 452 articles were identified.

Study Selection: Explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for each of 3 key questions. For studies of screening in nonpregnant women at increased risk, review was limited to randomized, controlled trials. For other groups, both randomized, controlled studies and nonrandomized, prospective, controlled studies were included.

Data Abstraction: Using standardized forms, staff of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality abstracted data on study design, setting, sample, randomization, blinding, results, and harms.

Data Synthesis: Only 1 new study met inclusion criteria. This poor-quality study of the effectiveness of screening for chlamydial infection among nonpregnant women at increased risk found that screening was associated with a lower prevalence of chlamydial infection and fewer reported cases of pelvic inflammatory disease at 1-year follow-up.

Limitations: No new evidence was found on screening in pregnant women, nonpregnant women not at increased risk, or men.

Conclusions: A systematic review found a small amount of new evidence to inform the USPSTF as it updates its recommendations regarding screening for chlamydial infection. There are large gaps in the evidence about screening men to improve health outcomes in women.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Reprints are available from the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov) and from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (800-358-9295 or e-mail at AHRQPubs{at}ahrq.hhs.gov).

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Meyers, Halvorson, and Luckhaupt: Center for Primary Care, Prevention, and Clinical Partnerships, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Annals:

Clinical Guidelines
Screening for Chlamydial Infection: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Annals 2007 147: 128-134. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Summaries for Patients
Screening for Chlamydial Infection: Recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Annals 2007 147: I-44. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Low, N. Bender, L. Nartey, A. Shang, and J. M. Stephenson
Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 435 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Cabbages and condoms
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 327 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. K. Moller, L. N. Pedersen, and K. Persson
Comparison of Gen-Probe Transcription-Mediated Amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR Assays for Detection of Wild-Type and Mutant Plasmid Strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 46(12): 3892 - 3895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. S. Lin, E. Whitlock, E. O'Connor, and V. Bauer
Behavioral Counseling to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2008; 149(7): 497 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Physicians.