Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 April 2007 | Volume 146 Issue 7 | Pages 516-526
Background: The risks and benefits of mammography screening among women 40 to 49 years of age remain an important issue for clinical practice.
Purpose: To evaluate the evidence about the risks and benefits of mammography screening for women 40 to 49 years of age.
Data Sources: English-language publications in MEDLINE (19662005), Pre-MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and references of selected studies through May 2005.
Study Selection: Previous systematic reviews; randomized, controlled trials; and observational studies.
Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers.
Data Synthesis: In addition to publications from the original mammography trials, 117 studies were included in the review. Meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials demonstrate a 7% to 23% reduction in breast cancer mortality rates with screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. Screening mammography is associated with an increased risk for mastectomy but a decreased risk for adjuvant chemotherapy and hormone therapy. The risk for death due to breast cancer from the radiation exposure involved in mammography screening is small and is outweighed by a reduction in breast cancer mortality rates from early detection. Rates of false-positive results are high (20% to 56% after 10 mammograms), but false-positive results have little effect on psychological health or subsequent mammography adherence. Although many women report pain at the time of the mammography, few see pain as a deterrent to future screening. Evidence about the effect of negative screening mammography on psychological well-being or the subsequent clinical presentation of breast cancer is insufficient.
Limitations: Few randomized, controlled trials assessed the risks of screening, and the literature search was completed in 2005.
Conclusions: Although few women 50 years of age or older have risks from mammography that outweigh the benefits, the evidence suggests that more women 40 to 49 years of age have such risks.
Author and Article Information
From the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Raritan, New Jersey; and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Faun Carter and Melani Sherman, who provided valuable administrative assistance.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Employment: J.A. Berlin (Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development); Stock ownership or options (other than mutual funds): J.A. Berlin (Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development).
Requests for Single Reprints: Katrina Armstrong, MD, MSCE, University of Pennsylvania, 1204 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Armstrong: University of Pennsylvania, 1204 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Ms. Moye: 435 East 30th Street, #518, New York, NY 10016.
Dr. Williams: University of Pennsylvania, 1220 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021.
Dr. Berlin: 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, P.O. Box 200, M/S 67, Titusville, NJ 08560.
Dr. Reynolds: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. L. Xiong, R. A. Bermudes, S. N. Torres, and R. E. Hales Use of Cancer-Screening Services Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness in Sacramento County Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2008; 59(8): 929 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dawood, K. Broglio, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, S.-W. Kau, W. Yang, C. Albarracin, F. Meric, G. Hortobagyi, and R. Theriault Development of New Cancers in Patients with DCIS: The M.D. Anderson Experience Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 244 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Djulbegovic, I. Hozo, and G. H. Lyman Estimating Net Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 882 - 882. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Additional articles abstracted in ACP Journal Club Evid. Based Med., October 1, 2007; 12(5): 158 - 158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Gemignani Breast Cancer Screening for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: What Is a Clinician to Do? Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 548 - 549. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Journal Watch (General), April 12, 2007; 2007(412): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Elmore and J. Choe Breast Cancer Screening for Women in Their 40s: Moving from Controversy about Data to Helping Individual Women Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 529 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all Rapid Responses